MRI findings of gluteus minimus muscle damage in primary total hip arthroplasty and the influence on clinical outcome

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 130, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 927-935

  Müller, Michael ^a   Tohtz, Stephan ^a   Winkler, Tobias ^a   Dewey, Marc ^a   Springer, Ivonne ^a   Perka, Carsten ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anterolateral minimally invasive approach; Gluteus minimus muscle; Magnetic resonance imaging; Muscle damage; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GLUTEUS MINIMUS MUSCLE INJURY; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP FRACTURE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE ATROPHY; MUSCLE INJURY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL APPROACH; TENDON LESION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BUTTOCKS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77955468791     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1085-4     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. J Alonso R Lamarca J Marti-Valls 2000 The pain and function of the hip (PFH) scale: a patient-based instrument for measuring outcome after total hip replacement Orthopedics 23 1273 1277 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ptVOhuw%3D%3D 11144496 (discussion 1277-1278)
2. AS Baker VC Bitounis 1989 Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review J Bone Jt Surg Br 71 47 50 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7itlGmsQ%3D%3D
3. R Bauer F Kerschbaumer S Poisel, et al. 1979 The transgluteal approach to the hip joint Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 95 47 49 10.1007/BF00379169 1:STN:280:DyaL3c7gvVGmug%3D%3D 526126 (Pubitemid 10162849)
4. M Beck JB Sledge E Gautier, et al. 2000 The anatomy and function of the gluteus minimus muscle J Bone Jt Surg Br 82 358 363 10.1302/0301-620X.82B3.10356 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ntFaktQ%3D%3D
5. Bertin KC, Rottinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res, pp 248-255
6. AR Britton DW Murray CJ Bulstrode, et al. 1997 Pain levels after total hip replacement: their use as endpoints for survival analysis J Bone Jt Surg Br 79 93 98 10.1302/0301-620X.79B1.6572 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7nt1eluw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27056432)
7. J Dawson R Fitzpatrick D Murray, et al. 1996 Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery Qual Health Care 5 81 88 10.1136/qshc.5.2.81 1:STN:280:DyaK283pt1Srtg%3D%3D 10158596
8. PP Gogia CM Christensen C Schmidt 1994 Total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip: improvement in pain and functional status Orthopedics 17 145 150 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3kvVSruw%3D%3D 8190678
9. F Gottschalk S Kourosh B Leveau 1989 The functional anatomy of tensor fasciae latae and gluteus medius and minimus J Anat 166 179 189 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7ltlKksA%3D%3D 2621137
10. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J et al (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res:78-83
11. Gray H, Bannister L, Berry M et al (1995) Gray's Anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery. Churchill-Livingstone, New York
12. K Hardinge 1982 The direct lateral approach to the hip J Bone Jt Surg Br 64 17 19 1:STN:280:DyaL387mslOgsw%3D%3D
13. Hollinshead W (1982) Anatomy for surgeons: the back and limbs. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
14. S Kamath N Venkatanarasimha MA Walsh, et al. 2008 MRI appearance of muscle denervation Skelet Radiol 37 397 404 10.1007/s00256-007-0409-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3gt1SitQ%3D%3D
15. M Kumagai N Shiba F Higuchi, et al. 1997 Functional evaluation of hip abductor muscles with use of magnetic resonance imaging J Orthop Res 15 888 893 10.1002/jor.1100150615 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7lvFamsg%3D%3D 9497815 (Pubitemid 28121503)
16. R Mcmurray J Heaton P Sloper, et al. 1999 Measurement of patient perceptions of pain and disability in relation to total hip replacement: the place of the Oxford hip score in mixed methods Qual Health Care 8 228 233 10.1136/qshc.8.4.228 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FgtlGjtg%3D%3D 10847884
17. Perka C, Heller M, Wilke K et al (2005) Surgical approach influences periprosthetic femoral bone density. Clin Orthop Relat Res, pp 153-159
18. CW Pfirrmann HP Notzli C Dora, et al. 2005 Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients Radiology 235 969 976 10.1148/radiol.2353040403 15860673 (Pubitemid 40695896)
19. CH Picado FL Garcia W Marques Jr 2007 Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after direct lateral approach to the hip Clin Orthop Relat Res 455 209 211 10.1097/01.blo.0000238805.87411.e8 16936578 (Pubitemid 46213733)
20. HG Potter BJ Nestor CM Sofka, et al. 2004 Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue J Bone Jt Surg 86-A 1947 1954
21. HJ Ralston VT Inman, et al. 1947 Mechanics of human isolated voluntary muscle Am J Physiol 151 612 620 1:STN:280:DyaH1c%2FksFKmsA%3D%3D 18901905
22. A Twair M Ryan M O'connell, et al. 2003 MRI of failed total hip replacement caused by abductor muscle avulsion AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 1547 1550 14627571
23. GL Wilson EK Capen NB Stubbs 1976 A fine-wire electromyographic investigation of the gluteus minimus and gluteus medius muscles Res Q 47 824 828 1:STN:280:DyaE2s7gsVSgtQ%3D%3D 1070757