Inclusive social tagging and its support in Web 2.0 services

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1460-1466

  Derntl, Michael ^a   Hampel, Thorsten ^b   Motschnig Pitrik, Renate ^a   Pitner, Tomáš ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

^c MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Folksonomy; Inclusive Universal Access; Social tagging; Web 2.0; Web services

Indexed keywords

BARRIER-FREE; FOLKSONOMIES; INCLUSIVE UNIVERSAL ACCESS; SEMANTIC DATA; SOCIAL TAGGING; SOCIOTECHNICAL; WEB 2.0;

ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; USER INTERFACES;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 79955774707     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. R. Adams Consilience in research methods for HCI and universal access Universal Access in the Information Society 5 3 2006 251 252 (Pubitemid 44605429)
2. V. Benson Perceptions of trust and experience. Potential barriers to Web 2.0-based learning International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 4 5 2008 427 437
3. Derntl, M., Hampel, T., Motschnig-Pitrik, R., and Pitner, T. (2008). Inclusive Social Tagging: A Paradigm for Tagging-Services in the Knowledge Society. Proceedings of First World Summit on the Knowledge Society (pp. 1-10). Athens, Greece.
4. Derntl, M., and Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2007). Inclusive Universal Access in Engineering Education. Proceedings of 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Milwaukee, WI.
5. D. Diamantini, and M. Pieri A blended mobile learning experience. the Nomadis case International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 4 2/3 2008 176 188
6. Drasil, P., Pitner, T., Hampel, T., and Steinbring, M. (2008). Get Ready for Mashability! Concepts for Web 2.0 Service Integration. Proceedings of Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (pp. 160-167). Barcelona, Spain.
7. Farroq, U., Kannamapallil, T. G., Song, Y., Ganoe, C. H., Carroll, J. M., and Giles, C. L. (2007). Evaluating Tagging Behavior in Social Bookmarking Systems: Metrics and Design Heuristics. Proceedings of 2007 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 351-360). Sanibel Island, FL.
8. Fellbaum, C. (Ed.). (1998). WordNet - An Electronic Lexical Database: MIT Press.
9. R.T. Fielding Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures 2000 University of Calfornia Irvine, CA
10. V. Geroimenko Dictionary of XML technologies and the semantic web 2004 Springer London
11. S.A. Golder, and B.A. Huberman Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems Journal of Information Science 32 2 2006 198 208 (Pubitemid 43384497)
12. Halvey, M. J., and Keane, M. T. (2007). An assessment of tag presentation techniques. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1313-1314). Banff, Canada. (Pubitemid 47582437)
13. Höfferer, P. (2007). Achieving Business Process Model Interoperability using Metamodels and Ontologies. Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1620-1631). St. Gallen, Switzerland.
14. D. Jonassen Accommodating ways of human knowing in the design of information and instruction International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 2 3/4 2006 181 190
15. M. Lux, and G. Dösinger From folksonomies to ontologies: Employing wisdom of the crowds to serve learning purposes International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 3 4/5 2007 515 528
16. R. Maier, and S. Thalmann Institutionalised collaborative tagging as an instrument for managing the maturing learning and knowledge resources International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 1 1/2 2008 70 84
17. A. Malizia, A. De Angeli, and S. Levialdi Human perception through collaborative semantics International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing 1 1 2008 97 107
18. Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D. M., and Davis, M. (2006). HT06, Tagging Paper, Taxonomy, Flickr, Academic Article, To Read. Proceedings of Seventeenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 31-40). Odense, Denmark.
19. B. Marte, C.M. Steiner, J. Heller, and D. Albert Activity- and taxonomy-based knowledge representation framework International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 4 2/3 2008 189 202
20. R. Motschnig-Pitrik, and M. Derntl Three Scenarios on Enhancing Learning by Providing Universal Access Universal Access in the Information Society 7 4 2008 247 258
21. M. Müller-Prove Model und Anwendungsperspektiven des Social Tagging B. Gaiser, T. Hampel, S. Panke, Good Tags - Bad Tags 2008 Waxman München
22. Network Working Group. (2005). The Atom Syndication Format. Retrieved November 11, 2008, from http://www.atompub.org/rfc4287.html.
23. Niles, I., and Pease, A. (2001). Towards a Standard Upper Ontology. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Ogunquit, Maine.
24. Obrst, L. (2003). Ontologies for Semantically Interoparable Systems. Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 366-369). New Orleans, Luisiana.
25. Oviatt, S. (2001). Designing Robust Multimodal Systems for Universal Access. Proceedings of Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 71-74). Alcacer do Sal, Portugal.
26. Pitner, T., Derntl, M., Hampel, T., and Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2007). Web 2.0 as Platform for Inclusive Universal Access in Cooperative Learning and Knowledge Sharing. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 49-56). Graz, Austria.
27. H. Rego, T. Moreira, F. Garcia, and E. Morales Metadata and knowledge management driven web-based learning information system International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 1 3 2009 215 228
28. RSS Advisory Board. (2007). RSS 2.0 Specification (version 2.0.10). Retrieved November 11, 2008, from http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification.
29. C. Stephanidis, and A. Savidis Universal access in the information society: Methods, tools, and interaction technologies Universal Access in the Information Society 1 1 2001 40 55
30. Tauberer, J. (2006). What is RDF. Retrieved April, 2008, from http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/01/24/rdf.html.
31. M. Vargas-Vera, and M.D. Lytras Exploiting semantic web and ontologies for personalised learning services: Towards semantic web-enabled learning portals for real learning experiences International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 4 1 2008 1 17
32. W3C. (1999). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Retrieved May, 2008, from http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505/.
33. W3C. (2004). SOAP Specifications. Retrieved Oct 8, 2003, from http://www.w3.org/TR/soap.
34. W3C. (2006). Web Accessibility Inititative (WAI) home page. Retrieved April, 2008, from http://www.w3.org/WAI/.
35. Yang, S. J. H., and Chen, I. Y. L. (2006). Universal Access and Content Adaptation in Mobile Learning. Proceedings of Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 1172-1173). Kerkrade, The Netherlands. (Pubitemid 46591864)