Activity- and taxonomy-based knowledge representation framework

International Journal of Knowledge and Learning

Volumn 4, Issue 2-3, 2008, Pages 189-202

  Marte, Birgit ^a   Steiner, Christina M ^a   Heller, Juergen ^b   Albert, Dietrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

knowledge representation; knowledge space theory; learning activities; learning objectives; skills and competences; taxonomies

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950265631     PISSN: 17411009     EISSN: 17411017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJKL.2008.020654     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Albert, D. and Held, T. (1994) ‘Establishing knowledge spaces by systematical problem construction’, in D. Albert (Ed.) Knowledge Structures, New York: Springer Verlag, pp.78–112.
2. Albert, D. and Held, T. (1999) ‘Component based knowledge spaces in problem solving and inductive reasoning’, in D. Albert and J. Lukas (Eds.) Knowledge Spaces: Theories, Empirical Research, and Applications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.15–40.
3. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., et al. (Eds.) (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Longman.
4. Ausubel, D.P. and Robinson, F.G. (1969) School Learning: An Introduction to Educational Psychology, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
5. Biggs, J. (1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University, Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
6. Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. (1982) Evaluating the Quality of Learning – The SOLO Taxonomy, 1st ed., New York: Academic Press.
7. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.) (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain, New York/Toronto: Longmans, Green.
8. Doignon, J. (1994) ‘Knowledge spaces and skill assignments’, in G.H. Fischer and D. Laming (Eds.) Contributions to Mathematical Psychology, Psychometrics and Methodology, New York: Springer–Verlag, pp.111–121.
9. Doignon, J-P. and Falmagne, J-C. (1985) ‘Spaces for the assessment of knowledge’, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 23, pp.175–196.
10. Doignon, J-P. and Falmagne, J-C. (1999) Knowledge Spaces, Berlin: Springer.
11. Düntsch, I. and Gediga, G. (1995) ‘Skills and knowledge structures’, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, Vol. 48, pp.9–27.
12. Falmagne, J-C., Koppen, M., Villano, M., Doignon, J-P. and Johannesen, L. (1990) ‘Introduction to knowledge spaces: how to build, test and search them’, Psychological Review, Vol. 97, pp.201–224.
13. Gagné, R.M. (1985) The Conditions of Learning, 4th ed., New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14. Heller, J., Mayer, B., Hockemeyer, C. and Albert, D. (2005) ‘Competence-based knowledge structures for personalised learning: distributed resources and virtual experiments’, in G. Albano, P. Ritrovato and S. Salerno (Eds.) Proceedings of the 1st ELeGI Conference, Vico Equense, March, pp.14–16.
15. Heller, J., Steiner, C., Hockemeyer, C. and Albert, D. (2006) ‘Competence-based knowledge structures for personalised learning’, International Journal on E-learning, Vol. 5, pp.75–88.
16. Hockemeyer, C. (2003) ‘Structures for teaching and testing competencies’, Talk at the 33rd European Mathematical Psychology Group (EMPG) Meeting, International University Madrid, Spain, 26–30 August.
17. Hockemeyer, C., Conlan, O., Wade, V. and Albert, D. (2003) ‘Applying competence prerequisite structures for eLearning and skill management’, Universal Journal of Computer Science, Vol. 9, pp.1428–1436.
18. IMS learning design best practice and implementation guide (2003) Version 1.0 final specification, http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/imsld_bestv1p0.html (retrieved 6 November 2007).
19. Korossy, K. (1997) ‘Extending the theory of knowledge spaces: a competence-performance approach’, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Vol. 205, pp.53–82.
20. Korossy, K. (1999) ‘Modelling knowledge as competence and performance’, in D. Albert and J. Lukas (Eds.) Knowledge Spaces: Theories, Empirical Research, and Applications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.103–132.
21. Krathwohl, D.R. (2002) ‘A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. An overview’, Theory Into Practice, Vol. 41, pp.212–218.
22. Krathwohl, D.R. and Payne, D.A. (1971) ‘Defining and assessing educational objectives’, in R.L. Thorndike (Ed.) Educational Measurement, Washington, DC: American Council on Education, pp.17–45.
23. Mager, R.F. (1962) Preparing Instructional Objectives, Palo Alto, CA: Fearon Publishers.
24. Mager, R.F. (1984) Preparing Instructional Objectives, 2nd ed., Belmont, CA: David S. Lake.
25. Marzano, R.J. (2001) Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objective, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
26. Mosely, D., Baumfield, V., Higgins, S., Lin, M., Miller, J., Newton, D., et al. (2004) ‘Thinking skill frameworks for post-16 learners: an evaluation’, A Research Report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre, Trowbridge: Cromwell Press, http://www.lsneducation.org.uk/pubs/pages/031541.aspx (retrieved 5 November 2007).
27. Tyler, R.W. (1949) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Vermunt, J.D. and Verloop, N. (1999) ‘Congruence and friction between learning and teaching’, Learning and Instruction, Vol. 9, pp.257–280.