On the statistical properties of SGoF multitesting method

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  De Uña Alvarez, Jacobo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

false discovery rate; genomics; multiple testing; p value

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FAMILY WISE ERROR RATE; NULL HYPOTHESIS; POWER ANALYSIS; SGOF MULTITESTING METHOD; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 79955687634     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15446115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1659     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ahdesmäki M, Strimmer K (2010). Feature selection in omics prediction problems using cat scores and false nondiscovery rate control. Annals of Applied Statistics 4:503-519.
2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995): Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 57:289-300.
3. Carvajal-Rodriguez A, de Uña-Á lvarez J, Rolan-Alvarez E (2009) A new multitest correction (SGoF) that increases its statistical power when increasing the number of tests. BMC Bioinformatics 10:209.
4. Carvajal-Rodríguez A, de Uña-Á lvarez J (2011) A Simulation Study on the Impact of Strong Dependence in High-Dimensional Multiple-Testing I: The Case without Effects. M.P. Rocha et al. (Eds.): 5th International Conference on PACBB, AISC 93, pp. 241-246. Springer
5. Cheng C, Pounds SB, Boyett JM, Pei, D, Kuo ML, Roussel (2004) Statistical significance threshold criteria for analysis of microarray gene expression data. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Vol. 3, Issue 1, Article 36.
6. Dalmasso C, Broet P, Moreau T (2005) A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate. Bioinformatics 21:660-668. (Pubitemid 40424792)
7. de Uña-́Alvarez J, Carvajal-Rodríguez A (2010) 'SGoFicance Trace': Assessing significance in high-dimensional testing problems. PLoS ONE 5(12): e15930. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015930
8. Donoho D, Jin J (2004) Higher criticism for detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures. Annals of Statistics 32:962-994. (Pubitemid 41250290)
9. Donoho D, Jin J (2008) Higher criticism thresholding: Optimal feature selection when useful features are rare and weak. Proceedings of National Academy of Science 105:14790-14795.
10. Efron B (2010) Correlated z-values and the accuracy of large-scale statistical estimates. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105:1042-1055.
11. Hall P, Jin J (2008) Properties of higher criticism under strong dependence. Annals of Statistics 36: 381-402.
12. Hall P, Jin J (2010) Innovated higher criticism for detecting spares signals in correlated noise. Annals of Statistics 38:1686-1732.
13. Dudoit S, van der Laan M (2008) Multiple Testing Procedures with Applications to Genomics. New York: Springer.
14. Hedenfalk I, Duggan D, Chen Y, Radmacher M, Bittner M, et al. (2001) Gene expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 344: 539-548. (Pubitemid 32167867)
15. Nguyen D (2004) On estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses for false discovery rate controlling procedures in exploratory DNA microarray sequences. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 47:611-637.
16. Nichols T, Hayasaka S (2003) Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 12: 419-446. (Pubitemid 37368969)
17. Owen A (2005) Variance of the number of false discoveries. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology 67:411-426. (Pubitemid 40855292)
18. Storey JD (2003) The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Annals of Statistics 31: 2013-2035. (Pubitemid 38293903)
19. Storey JD, Tibshirani R (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of National Academy of Science 100: 9440-9445. (Pubitemid 37033947)
20. Storey JD, Taylor JE, Siegmund D (2004) Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology 66:187-205. (Pubitemid 38210666)