Is bone loss the reversal of bone accrual? Evidence from a cross-sectional study in daughter-mother-grandmother trios

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 934-940

  Wang, Qin ^a,b   Xu, Leiting ^b   Wang, Qingju ^c   Chen, Decai ^a   Tian, Haoming ^a   Lu, Chunyan ^a   Cheng, Shumei ^b   Völgyi, Eszter ^b   Wiklund, Petri ^b   Munukka, Eveliina ^b   Nicholson, Patrick ^b   Alén, Markku ^d   Cheng, Sulin ^b,e  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^e KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

BONE MASS DISTRIBUTION; LOAD; MECHANOSTAT; RADIUS; TIBIA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MASS; BONE MINERAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DAUGHTER; FEMALE; GRANDMOTHER; GRANDPARENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOTHER; OSTEOLYSIS; PERIPHERAL QUANTITATIVE COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; RADIUS; TIBIA SHAFT; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BONE AND BONES; BONE DENSITY; BONE RESORPTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MOTHERS; MUSCLES; NUCLEAR FAMILY; RADIUS; TIBIA;

EID: 79955615552     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.291     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bone CurreyJ., Structure and Mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.
2. Turner CH., Bone strength: current concepts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1068: 429-446. (Pubitemid 43824172)
3. Seeman E., Structural basis of growth-related gain and age-related loss of bone strength. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008; 47 (suppl 4): iv2-8. (Pubitemid 351865955)
4. Zebaze RM, Jones A, Knackstedt M, Maalouf G, Seeman E., Construction of the femoral neck during growth determines its strength in old age. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 22: 1055-1061. (Pubitemid 351339728)
5. Zebaze RM, Jones A, Welsh F, Knackstedt M, Seeman E., Femoral neck shape and the spatial distribution of its mineral mass varies with its size: clinical and biomechanical implications. Bone. 2005; 37: 243-252. (Pubitemid 40962433)
6. Skerry TM., One mechanostat or many? Modifications of the site-specific response of bone to mechanical loading by nature and nurture. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2006; 6: 122-127. (Pubitemid 44201571)
7. Burr DB, Milgrom C, Fyhrie D, et al. In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity. Bone. 1996; 18: 405-410. (Pubitemid 26152302)
8. Wang Q, Cheng S, Alen M, Seeman E., Bone's structural diversity in adult females is established before puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94: 1555-1561.
9. Seeman E., The structural and biomechanical basis of the gain and loss of bone strength in women and men. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2003; 32: 25-38. (Pubitemid 36378633)
10. Szulc P, Seeman E, Duboeuf F, Sornay-Rendu E, Delmas PD., Bone fragility: failure of periosteal apposition to compensate for increased endocortical resorption in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 21: 1856-1863. (Pubitemid 44851561)
11. Maltais ML, Desroches J, Dionne IJ., Changes in muscle mass and strength after menopause. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2009; 9: 186-197.
12. Murton AJ, Greenhaff PL., Muscle atrophy in immobilization and senescence in humans. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009; 22: 500-505.
13. Cheng S, Lyytikainen A, Kroger H, et al. Effects of calcium, dairy product, and vitamin D supplementation on bone mass accrual and body composition in 10-12-y-old girls: a 2-y randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 82: 1115-1126 quiz 1147-1118. (Pubitemid 43779773)
14. Cheng S, Volgyi E, Tylavsky FA, et al. Trait-specific tracking and determinants of body composition: a 7-year follow-up study of pubertal growth in girls. BMC Med. 2009; 7: 5.
15. Lyytikainen A, Lamberg-Allardt C, Kannas L, Cheng S., Food consumption and nutrient intakes with a special focus on milk product consumption in early pubertal girls in Central Finland. Public Health Nutr. 2005; 8: 284-289. (Pubitemid 40695068)
16. Cheng S, Toivanen JA, Suominen H, Toivanen JT, Timonen J., Estimation of structural and geometrical properties of cortical bone by computerized tomography in 78-year-old women. J Bone Miner Res. 1995; 10: 139-148.
17. Hickman M, Gaspar RC, de Matos M., Exercise and Leisure-time Activities. In: Behaviour among Young People, 2000; WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen, pp. 73-82.
18. Prochaska JJ, Sallis JF, Long B., A physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001; 155: 554-559. (Pubitemid 32405778)
19. McArdle WDKF, Katch VL., Energy expenditure in household, occupational, recreational, and sports activities. Exercise Physiology. In: Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition and Human performance., 1996; Williams and Wilkins, Media. Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 769-781.
20. Cristofolini L, Conti G, Juszczyk M, Cremonini S, Van Sint Jan S, Viceconti M., Structural behaviour and strain distribution of the long bones of the human lower limbs. J Biomech. 2010; 43: 826-835.
21. Lieberman DE, Polk JD, Demes B., Predicting long bone loading from cross-sectional geometry. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004; 123: 156-171. (Pubitemid 38134025)
22. Lanyon LE., The success and failure of the adaptive response to functional load-bearing in averting bone fracture. Bone. 1992; 13 (Suppl 2): S17-21.
23. Mullender M, van Rietbergen B, Ruegsegger P, Huiskes R., Effect of mechanical set point of bone cells on mechanical control of trabecular bone architecture. Bone. 1998; 22: 125-131. (Pubitemid 28058502)
24. Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH., Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts. J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17: 1545-1554. (Pubitemid 34803837)
25. Warden SJ, Hurst JA, Sanders MS, Turner CH, Burr DB, Li J., Bone adaptation to a mechanical loading program significantly increases skeletal fatigue resistance. J Bone Miner Res. 2005; 20: 809-816. (Pubitemid 40571638)
26. Nikander R, Kannus P, Rantalainen T, Uusi-Rasi K, Heinonen A, Sievanen H., Cross-sectional geometry of weight-bearing tibia in female athletes subjected to different exercise loadings. Osteoporos Int. 2010; 21: 1687-1694.
27. Rantalainen T, Nikander R, Heinonen A, Suominen H, Sievanen H., Direction-specific diaphyseal geometry and mineral mass distribution of tibia and fibula: a pQCT study of female athletes representing different exercise loading types. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010; 86: 447-454.
28. Frost HM., Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": a proposal. Anat Rec. 1987; 219: 1-9.
29. Skerry TM., The response of bone to mechanical loading and disuse: fundamental principles and influences on osteoblast/osteocyte homeostasis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008; 473: 117-123.
30. Gray H, Pick T., Gray's Anatomy New York. Barnes & Noble Books, 1995.
31. Brodt MD, Ellis CB, Silva MJ., Growing C57Bl/6 mice increase whole bone mechanical properties by increasing geometric and material properties. J Bone Miner Res. 1999; 14: 2159-2166. (Pubitemid 30026966)
32. Pocock NA, Eisman JA, Hopper JL, Yeates MG, Sambrook PN, Eberl S., Genetic determinants of bone mass in adults. A twin study. J Clin Invest. 1987; 80: 706-710. (Pubitemid 18003941)
33. Smith DM, Nance WE, Kang KW, Christian JC, Johnston CC Jr., Genetic factors in determining bone mass. J Clin Invest. 1973; 52: 2800-2808.
34. Matkovic V, Jelic T, Wardlaw GM, et al. Timing of peak bone mass in Caucasian females and its implication for the prevention of osteoporosis. Inference from a cross-sectional model. J Clin Invest. 1994; 93: 799-808.
35. Recker RR, Davies KM, Hinders SM, Heaney RP, Stegman MR, Kimmel DB., Bone gain in young adult women. JAMA. 1992; 268: 2403-2408.