The multinomial model of prospective memory validity of ongoing-task parameters

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 247-255

  Horn, Sebastian S ^a   Bayen, Ute J ^a   Smith, Rebekah E ^b   Boywitt, C Dennis ^c  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Formal model; Multinomial model; Prospective memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; TIME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955505540     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000091     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baayen, H. R., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD ROM]. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3. Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49, 5-28.
4. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
5. Bisiacchi, P. S., Schiff, S., Ciccola, A., & Kliegel, M. (2009). The role of dual-task and task-switch in prospective memory: Behavioural data and neural correlates. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1362-1373.
6. Burgess, P., Quayle, A., & Frith, C. (2001). Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography. Neuropsychologia, 39, 545-555. (Pubitemid 32197526)
7. Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cohen, A-L., Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Number of cues influence the cost of remembering to remember. Memory and Cognition, 36, 149-156. (Pubitemid 351927948)
10. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163-191.
11. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717-726.
12. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 115-141). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Erdfelder, E., Auer, T.-S., Hilbig, B. E., Asfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models. A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 108-124.
14. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
15. Horn, S. S., Bayen, U. J., & Smith, R. E. (2008). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. In A. Labisch (Ed.), Jahrbuch der Heinrich-Heine Universität Dü sseldorf 2007/2008 (pp. 275-283). Düsseldorf, Germany: dup. Retrieved July 27, 2009, from http://www.uni-duesseldorf.de/home/Jahrbuch/2007/PDF/Bayen.pdf.
16. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
17. Klauer, K. C., & Zhao, Z. (2004). Double dissociations in visual and spatial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 355-381. (Pubitemid 39203048)
18. Kliegel, M., Ramuschkat, G., & Martin, M. (2003). Executive functions and prospective memory performance in old age: An analysis of event-based and time-based prospective memory. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 36, 35-41. (Pubitemid 36286315)
19. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
20. Marsh, R. L., Hancock, T., & Hicks, J. L. (2002). The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 604-610.
21. Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 336-349. (Pubitemid 128549078)
22. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Watson, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 652-659.
23. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42-54.
25. Norman, D., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwarts & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and selfregulation: Advances in research and theory (4, pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum Press.
26. Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411- 421.
27. Otani, H., Landau, J. D., Libkuman, T. M., St. Louis, J. P., & Kazen, J. K. (1997). Prospective memory and divided attention. Memory, 5, 343-360. (Pubitemid 127473490)
28. Schouten, J. F., & Bekker, J. A. M. (1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 27, 143-153.
29. Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727-741.
30. Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 347-361. (Pubitemid 38156910)
31. Smith, R. E. (2010). What costs do reveal, moving beyond the cost debate: Reply to Einstein, McDaniel (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1089-1095.
32. Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 756-777. (Pubitemid 38845997)
33. Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2005). The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory: A formal modeling approach. Experimental Psychology, 52, 243-256. (Pubitemid 41634360)
34. Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2006). The source of adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: A multinomial modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 623-635. (Pubitemid 43883063)
35. Smith, R. E., Bayen, U. J., & Martin, C. (2010). The cognitive processes underlying event-based prospective memory in school age children and young adults: A formal model-based study. Developmental Psychology, 46, 230-244.
36. Spaniol, J., & Bayen, U. J. (2002). When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 631-651.
37. Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2007). HMMTree: A computer program for hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 267-273.
38. Tresch, M. C., Sinnamon, H. M., & Seamon, J. G. (1993). Double dissociation of spatial and object visual memory: Evidence from selective interference in intact human subjects. Neuropsychologia, 31, 211-219. (Pubitemid 23103033)