The Dynamics of Intention Retrieval and Coordination of Action in Event-Based Prospective Memory

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 652-659

  Marsh, Richard L ^a,c   Hicks, Jason L ^b   Watson, Valerie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MOTIVATION; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; RECALL; REINFORCEMENT;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; MOTIVATION; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 85047670667     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.652     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 5-28.
2. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80(3, Pt. 2).
3. Cherry, K. E., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). Age and individual differences influence prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 14, 60-76.
4. Einstein, G. O., Holland, L. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Guynn, M. J. (1992). Age-related deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity. Psychology and Aging, 7, 471-478.
5. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717-726.
6. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Manzi, M., Cochran, B., & Baker, M. (2000). Prospective memory and aging: Forgetting intentions over short delays. Psychology and Aging, 15, 671-683.
7. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Richardson, S. L., Guynn, M. J., & Confer, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 996-1007.
8. Einstein, G. O., Smith, R. E., McDaniel, M. A., & Shaw, P. (1997). Aging and prospective memory: The influence of increased task demands at encoding and retrieval. Psychology and Aging, 12, 479-488.
9. Ellis, J., Kvavilashvili, L., & Milne, A. (1999). Experimental tests of prospective remembering: The influence of cue-event frequency on performance, British Journal of Psychology, 90, 9-23.
10. Ellis, J., & Milne, A. (1996). Retrieval cue specificity and the realization of delayed intentions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 862-887.
11. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211-1226.
12. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1996). Remembering what to do: Explicit and implicit memory for intentions. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 53-91). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1409-1419.
14. Joordens, S., & Becker, S. (1997). The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1083-1105.
15. Kǔera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
16. Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 336-349.
17. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Bink, M. L. (1998). The activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 350-361.
18. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Bryan, E. (1999). The activation of unrelated and cancelled intentions. Memory & Cognition, 27, 320-327.
19. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Hancock, T. W. (2000). On the interaction of ongoing cognitive activity and the nature of an event-based intention. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S29-S42.
20. Maylor, E. A. (1993). Aging and forgetting in prospective and retrospective memory tasks. Psychology and Aging, 8, 420-428.
21. Maylor, E. A. (1996). Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective memory task. Psychology and Aging, 11, 74-79.
22. Maylor, E. A., Darby, R. J., & Della Sala, S. (2000). Retrieval of performed versus to-be performed tasks: A naturalistic study of the intention superiority effect in normal aging and dementia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S83-S98.
23. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 23-41.
24. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127-S144.
25. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneneldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
26. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
28. Park, D. C., Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Morrell, R. W., & Mayhorn, C. B. (1997). Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 12, 314-327.
29. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155-189). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
30. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385-408.
31. Shoben, E. J. (1982). Semantic and lexical decisions. In C. R. Puff (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition (pp. 287-314). New York: Academic Press.
32. West, R., & Craik, F. I. M. (1999). Age-related decline in prospective memory: The roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. Psychology and Aging, 14, 264-272.