Erratum: A chaperonin subunit with unique structures is essential for folding of a specific substrate (PLoS Biology (2011) 9:4 (e1001040) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001040);A chaperonin subunit with unique structures is essential for folding of a specific substrate

PLoS Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Peng, Lianwei ^a   Fukao, Yoichiro ^b   Myouga, Fumiyoshi ^c   Motohashi, Reiko ^d   Shinozaki, Kazuo ^c   Shikanai, Toshiharu ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NARA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHIZUOKA   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; CHAPERONIN 60 BETA1; CHAPERONIN 60 BETA2; CHAPERONIN 60 BETA3; CHAPERONIN 60 BETA4; CHLOROPHYLL; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN CRR7; PROTEIN NDHH; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE DEHYDROGENASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CHLOROPLAST; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHOTOSYSTEM I; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ESCHERICHIA COLI;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARABIDOPSIS; CHAPERONIN 60; CHLOROPLASTS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, AFFINITY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

EID: 79955492385     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000972     Document Type: Erratum

References (62)

1. Frydman J, (2001) Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem 70: 603-647.
2. Hartl F. U, Hayer-Hartl M, (2002) Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science 295: 1852-1858.
3. Fenton W. A, Horwich A. L, (2003) Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: fate of substrate polypeptide. Q Rev Biophys 36: 229-256.
4. Horwich A. L, Fenton W. A, Chapman E, Farr G. W, (2007) Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23: 115-145.
5. Hartl F. U, Hayer-Hartl M, (2009) Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nature Struct Mol Biol 16: 574-581.
6. Braig K, Otwinowski Z, Hegde R, Boisvert D. C, Joachimiak A, et al. (1994) The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature 371: 578-586.
7. Saibil H. R, Ranson N. A, (2002) The chaperonin folding machine. Trends Biochem Sci 27: 627-632.
8. Xu Z. H, Horwich A. L, Sigler P. B, (1997) The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388: 741-749.
9. Mayhew M, Da Silva A. C. R, Martin J, Erdjument-bromage H, Tempst P, et al. (1996) Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature 379: 420-426.
10. Weissman J. S, Rye H. S, Fenton W. A, Beechem J. M, Horwich A. L, (1996) Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell 84: 481-490.
11. Kerner M. J, Naylor D. J, Ishihaman Y, Maier T, Chang H. C, et al. (2005) Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 122: 209-220.
12. Fujiwara K, Ishihama Y, Nakahigashi K, Soga T, Taguchi H, (2010) A systematic survey of in vivo obligate chaperonin-dependent substrates. EMBO J 29: 1552-1564.
13. Lund P. A, (2009) Multiple chaperonins in bacteria-why so many? FEMS Microbiol Rev 33: 785-800.
14. Hill J. E, Hemmingsen S. M, (2001) Arabidopsis thaliana type I and type II chaperonins. Cell Stress & Chaperones 6: 190-200.
15. Ogawa J, Long S. R, (1995) The Rhizobium meliloti groELc locus is required for regulation of early nod genes by the transcription activator NodD. Gene Dev 9: 714-729.
16. Fischer H. M, Schneider K, Babst M, Hennecke H, (1999) GroEL chaperonins are required for the formation of a functional nitrogenase in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Arch Microbiol 171: 279-289.
17. Gould P. S, Burgar H. R, Lund P. A, (2007) Homologous cpn60 genes in Rhizobium leguminosarum are not functionally equivalent. Cell Stress Chaperon 12: 123-131.
18. Ojha A, Anand M, Bhatt A, Kremer L, Jacobs W. R, et al. (2005) GroEL1: a dedicated chaperone involved in mycolic acid biosynthesis during biofilm formation in mycobacteria. Cell 123: 861-873.
19. Pushkin A. V, Tsuprun V. L, Solovjeva N. A, Shubin V. V, Evstigneeva Z. G, et al. (1982) High molecular weight pea leaf protein similar to the groE protein of Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta 704: 379-384.
20. Tsuprun V. L, Boekema E. J, Samsonidze T. G, Pushkin A. V, (1991) Electron microscopy of the complexes of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) and Rubisco subunit-binding protein from pea leaves. FEBS Lett 289: 205-209.
21. Hemmingsen S. M, Ellis R. J, (1986) Purification and properties of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase large subunit binding protein. Plant Physiol 80: 269-276.
22. Musgrove J. E, Johnson R. A, Ellis R. J, (1987) Dissociation of the ribulosebisphosphate-carboxylase large-subunit binding protein into dissimilar subunits. Eur J Biochem 163: 529-534.
23. Martel R, Cloney L. P, Pelcher L. E, Hemmingsen S. M, (1990) Unique composition of plastid chaperonin-60: α and β polypeptide-encoding genes are highly divergent. Gene 94: 181-187.
24. Dickson R, Weiss C, Howard R. J, Alldrick S. P, Ellis R. J, et al. (2000) Reconstitution of higher plant chloroplast chaperonin 60 tetradecamers active in protein folding. J Biol Chem 275: 11829-11835.
25. Nishio K, Hirohashi T, Nakai M, (1999) Chloroplast chaperonins: evidence for heterogeneous assembly of α and β Cpn60 polypeptides into a chaperonin oligomer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 266: 584-587.
26. Weiss C, Bonshtien A, Farchi-Pisanty O, Vitlin A, Azem A, (2009) Cpn20: Siamese twins of the chaperonin world. Plant Mol Biol 69: 227-238.
27. Peltier J. B, Emanuelsson O, Kalume D. E, Ytterberg J, Friso G, et al. (2006) The oligomeric stromal proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts. Mol Cell Proteomics 5: 114-133.
28. Apuya N. R, Yadegari R, Fischer R. L, Harada J. J, Zimmerman J. L, et al. (2001) The Arabidopsis embryo mutant schlepperless has a defect in the Chaperonin-60α gene. Plant Physiol 126: 717-730.
29. Suzuki K, Nakanishi H, Bower J, Yoder D. W, Osteryoung K. W, et al. (2009) Plastid chaperonin proteins Cpn60α and Cpn60 β are required for plastid division in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol 9: 38.
30. Llorca O, McCormack E. A, Hynes G, Grantham J, Cordell J, et al. (1999) Eukaryotic type II chaperonin CCT interacts with actin through specific subunits. Nature 402: 693-696.
31. Amit M, Weisberg S. J, Nadler-Holly M, McCormack E. A, Feldmesser E, et al. (2010) Equivalent mutations in the eight subunits of the chaperonin CCT produce dramatically different cellular and gene expression phenotypes. J Mol Biol 401: 532-543.
32. Shikanai T, (2007) Cyclic electron transport around photosystem I: genetic approaches. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58: 199-217.
33. Shikanai T, Endo T, Hasimoto T, Yamada Y, Asada K, et al. (1998) Directed disruption of the tobacco ndhB gene impairs cyclic electron flow around photosystem I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 9705-9709.
34. Suorsa M, Sirpiö S, Aro E-M, (2009) Towards characterization of the chloroplast NAD(P)H dehydrogenase complex. Mol Plant 2: 1127-1140.
35. Peng L, Yamamoto H, Shikanai T, (2010) Structure and biogenesis of the chloroplast NAD(P)H dehydrogenase complex. Biochim Biophys Acta doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.10.015.
36. Kuromori T, Hirayama T, Kiyosue Y, Takabe H, Mizukado S, et al. (2004) A collection of 11,800 single-copy Ds transposon insertion lines in Arabidopsis. Plant J 37: 897-905.
37. Okuda K, Myouga F, Motohashi R, Shinozaki K, Shikanai T, (2007) Conserved domain structure of pentatricopeptide repeat proteins involved in chloroplast RNA editing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 8178-8183.
38. Peng L, Shimizu H, Shikanai T, (2008) The chloroplast NAD(P)H dehydrogenase complex interacts with photosystem I in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 83: 34873-34879.
39. Peng L, Fukao Y, Fujiwara M, Takami T, Shikanai T, (2009) Efficient operation of NAD(P)H dehydrogenase requires supercomplex formation with photosystem I via minor LHCI in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21: 3623-3640.
40. Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T, Sato T, Nagasu T, et al. (2005) Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 1265-1272.
41. Peng L, Cai W, Shikanai T, (2010) Chloroplast stromal proteins, CRR6 and CRR7, are required for assembly of the NAD(P)H dehydrogenase subcomplex A in Arabidopsis. Plant J 63: 203-211.
42. Obayashi T, Hayashi S, Saeki M, Ohta H, Kinoshita K, (2009) ATTED-II provides coexpressed gene networks for Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D987-D991.
43. Tang Y. C, Chang H. C, Roeben A, Wischnewski D, Wischnewski N, et al. (2006) Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein. Cell 125: 903-914.
44. Brocchieri L, Karlin S, (2000) Conservation among HSP60 sequences in relation to structure, function, and evolution. Prot Sci 9: 476-486.
45. Wastl J, Fraunholz M, Zauner S, Douglas S, Maier U. G, (1999) Ancient gene duplication and differential gene flow in plastid lineages: the GroEL/Cpn60 example. J Mol Evol 48: 112-117.
46. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T, (2006) The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a Web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22: 195-201.
47. Tang Y. C, Chang H. C, Chakraborty K, Hartl F. U, Hayer-Hartl M, (2008) Essential role of the chaperonin folding compartment in vivo. EMBO J 27: 1458-1468.
48. Farr G. W, Fenton W. A, Horwich A. L, (2007) Perturbed ATPase activity and not "close confinement" of substrate in the cis cavity affects rates of folding by tail-multiplied GroEL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 5342-5347.
49. Suzuki M, Ueno T, Iizuka R, Miura T, Zako T, et al. (2008) Effect of the C-terminal truncation on the functional cycle of chaperonin GroEL: implication that the C-terminal region facilitates the transition from the folding-arrested to the folding-competent state. J Biol Chem 283: 23931-23939.
50. Machida K, Kono-Okada A, Hongo K, Mizobata T, Kawata Y, (2008) Hydrophilic residues 526KNDAAD531 in the flexible C-terminal region of the chaperonin GroEL are critical for substrate protein folding within the central cavity. J Biol Chem 283: 6886-6896.
51. McLennan N. F, Girshovich A. S, Lissin N. M, Charters Y, Masters M, (1993) The strongly conserved carboxyl-terminus glycine-methionine motif of Escherichia coli GroEL chaperonin is dispensable. Mol Microbiol 7: 49-58.
52. McLennan N. F, McAteer S, Masters M, (1994) The tail of a chaperonin: the C-terminal region of Escherichia coli GroEL protein. Mol Microbiol 14: 309-321.
53. Wang J. D, Herman C, Tipton K. A, Gross C. A, Weissman J. S, (2002) Directed evolution of substrate-optimized GroEL/S chaperonins. Cell 111: 1027-1039.
54. Sielaff B, Lee K. S, Tsai F. T, (2011) Structural and functional conservation of mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL paralogs suggests that GroEL1 is a chaperonin. J Mol Biol 405: 831-839.
55. Hashimoto M, Endo T, Peltier G, Tasaka M, Shikanai T, (2003) A nucleus-encoded factor, CRR2, is essential for the expression of chloroplast ndhB in Arabidopsis. Plant J 36: 541-549.
56. Thompson J. D, Gibson T. J, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins D. G, (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 4876-4882.
57. Guindon S, Gascuel O, (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52: 696-704.
58. Posada D, Crandall K. A, (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
59. Huelsenbeck J. P, Ronquist F, (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
60. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T, (2006) The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22: 195-201.
61. Fenton W. A, Kashi Y, Furtak K, Horwich A. L, (1994) Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371: 614-619.
62. Buckle A. M, Zahn R, Fersht A. R, (1997) A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 3571-3575.