Regulative patterning in limb bud transplants is induced by distalizing activity of apical ectodermal ridge signals on host limb cells

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 240, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1203-1211

  Roselló Díez, Alberto ^a   Torres, Miguel ^a  

^a CENTRO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES CARDIOVASCULARES CNIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Apical ectodermal ridge; Limb development; Proximodistal axis; Regulative patterning

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHICK EMBRYO; ECTODERM; EMBRYO PATTERN FORMATION; EMBRYONAL TISSUE; LIMB BUD; LIMB DEVELOPMENT; LIMB REGENERATION; MOSAIC LIMB DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATIVE LIMB DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; ECTODERM; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EXTREMITIES; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LIMB BUDS;

EID: 79955049274     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: 10970177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.22635     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Amprino R, Camosso M. 1958. Experimental observations on influences exerted by the proximal over the distal territories of the extremities. Experientia 14: 241-243.
2. Amprino R, Camosso M. 1959a. [Observation on experimental duplication of the distal part of the primordium of the wing in chick embryo]. Arch Anat Microsc Morphol Exp 48: 261-305.
3. Amprino R, Camosso M. 1959b. On the role of the "apical ridge" in the development of the chick embryo limb bud. Acta Anat (Basel) 38: 280-288.
4. Amprino R, Camosso ME. 1965. [The regulation of excesses of the limb rudiment of the chicken]. Arch Anat Microsc Morphol Exp 54: 781-809.
5. Boehm B, Westerberg H, Lesnicar-Pucko G, Raja S, Rautschka M, Cotterell J, Swoger J, Sharpe J. 2010. The role of spatially controlled cell proliferation in limb bud morphogenesis. PLoS Biol 8: e1000420.
6. Bowen J, Hinchliffe JR, Horder TJ, Reeve AM. 1989. The fate map of the chick forelimb-bud and its bearing on hypothesized developmental control mechanisms. Anat Embryol (Berl) 179: 269-283.
7. Bryant SV, Iten LE. 1974. The regulative ability of the limb regeneration blastema of Notophthalmus viridescens: experiments in situ. Wilhelm Roux Arch EntwMech Org 174: 90-101.
8. Chapman DL, Garvey N, Hancock S, Alexiou M, Agulnik SI, Gibson-Brown JJ, Cebra-Thomas J, Bollag RJ, Silver LM, Papaioannou VE. 1996. Expression of the T-box family genes, Tbx1-Tbx5, during early mouse development. Dev Dyn 206: 379-390.
9. Chiang C, Litingtung Y, Lee E, Young KE, Corden JL, Westphal H, Beachy PA. 1996. Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature 383: 407-413.
10. Cohn MJ, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Abud H, Heath JK, Tickle C. 1995. Fibroblast growth factors induce additional limb development from the flank of chick embryos. Cell 80: 739-746.
11. Driesch H. 1892. The potency of the first two cleavage cells in echinoderm development. Experimental production of partial and double formation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
12. Dudley AT, Ros MA, Tabin CJ. 2002. A re-examination of proximodistal patterning during vertebrate limb development. Nature 418: 539-544.
13. Fallon JF, Lopez A, Ros MA, Savage MP, Olwin BB, Simandl BK. 1994. FGF-2: apical ectodermal ridge growth signal for chick limb development. Science 264: 104-107.
14. Fernandez-Teran MA, Hinchliffe JR, Ros MA. 2006. Birth and death of cells in limb development: a mapping study. Dev Dyn 235: 2521-2537.
15. French V, Bryant PJ, Bryant SV. 1976. Pattern regulation in epimorphic fields. Science 193: 969-981.
16. Gibson-Brown JJ, Agulnik SI, Chapman DL, Alexiou M, Garvey N, Silver LM, Papaioannou VE. 1996. Evidence of a role for T-box genes in the evolution of limb morphogenesis and the specification of forelimb/hindlimb identity. Mech Dev 56: 93-101.
17. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. 1992. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. Dev Dyn 195: 231-272.
18. Hampe A. 1959. [Contribution to the study of the development and the regulation of deficiencies and excesses in the feet of chick embryos]. Arch Anat Microsc Morphol Exp 48: 345-478.
19. Hornbruch A, Wolpert L. 1970. Cell division in the early growth and morphogenesis of the chick limb. Nature 226: 764-766.
20. Kieny M. 1964a. [Regulation of excesses and deficiencies of the wing rudiment of the chick embryo]. Arch Anat Microsc Morphol Exp 53: 29-44.
21. Kieny M. 1964b. [Study of the mechanism of regulation in the development of the limb buds of the chick embryo. I. Regulation of the excess]. Dev Biol 22: 197-229.
22. Kieny M. 1964c. [Study of the mechanism of regulation of development of limb rudiments in the chick embryo. II. Regulation of deficiencies in "Wing-Leg" and "Leg-Wing" chimeras]. J Embryol Exp Morphol 12: 357-371.
23. Kieny M, Pautou M-P. 1977. Proximo-distal pattern regulation in deficient avian limb buds. Dev Genes Evol 183: 177-191.
24. Kostakopoulou K, Vogel A, Brickell P, Tickle C. 1996. 'Regeneration' of wing bud stumps of chick embryos and reactivation of Msx-1 and Shh expression in response to FGF-4 and ridge signals. Mech Dev 55: 119-131.
25. Kostakopoulou K, Vargesson N, Clarke JD, Brickell PM, Tickle C. 1997. Local origin of cells in FGF-4 - induced outgrowth of amputated chick wing bud stumps. Int J Dev Biol 41: 747-750.
26. Krabbenhoft KM, Fallon JF. 1989. The formation of leg or wing specific structures by leg bud cells grafted to the wing bud is influenced by proximity to the apical ridge. Dev Biol 131: 373-382.
27. Lawrence PA, Levine M. 2006. Mosaic and regulative development: two faces of one coin. Curr Biol 16: R236-R239.
28. Lewis JH. 1975. Fate maps and the pattern of cell division: a calculation for the chick wing-bud. J Embryol Exp Morphol 33: 419-434.
29. Maden M. 1980. Intercalary regeneration in the amphibian limb and the rule of distal transformation. J Embryol Exp Morphol 56: 201-209.
30. Maden M, Sonneveld E, van der Saag PT, Gale E. 1998. The distribution of endogenous retinoic acid in the chick embryo: implications for developmental mechanisms. Development 125: 4133-4144.
31. Mariani FV, Ahn CP, Martin GR. 2008. Genetic evidence that FGFs have an instructive role in limb proximal-distal patterning. Nature 453: 401-405.
32. Mercader N, Leonardo E, Piedra ME, Martinez AC, Ros MA, Torres M. 2000. Opposing RA and FGF signals control proximodistal vertebrate limb development through regulation of Meis genes. Development 127: 3961-3970.
33. Morgan BA, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Duboule D, Tabin CJ. 1992. Targeted misexpression of Hox-4.6 in the avian limb bud causes apparent homeotic transformations. Nature 358: 236-239.
34. Niswander L, Tickle C, Vogel A, Booth I, Martin GR. 1993. FGF-4 replaces the apical ectodermal ridge and directs outgrowth and patterning of the limb. Cell 75: 579-587.
35. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E, Tabin C. 1993. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75: 1401-1416.
36. Ros MA, Simandl BK, Clark AW, Fallon JF. 2000. Methods for manipulating the chick limb bud to study gene expression, tissue interactions, and patterning. Methods Mol Biol 137: 245-266.
37. Rossant J, Zirngibl R, Cado D, Shago M, Giguere V. 1991. Expression of a retinoic acid response element-hsplacZ transgene defines specific domains of transcriptional activity during mouse embryogenesis. Genes Dev 5: 1333-1344.
38. Roux W. 1888. Contributions to the developmental mechanics of the embryo. On the artificial production of half-embryos by the destruction of one of the first two blastomeres, and the later development (postgeneration) the missing half of the body. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
39. Rowe DA, Fallon JF. 1981. The effect of removing posterior apical ectodermal ridge of the chick wing and leg on pattern formation. J Embryol Exp Morphol 65(suppl): 309-325.
40. Rowe DA, Cairns JM, Fallon JF. 1982. Spatial and temporal patterns of cell death in limb bud mesoderm after apical ectodermal ridge removal. Dev Biol 93: 83-91.
41. Sato K, Koizumi Y, Takahashi M, Kuroiwa A, Tamura K. 2007. Specification of cell fate along the proximal-distal axis in the developing chick limb bud. Development 134: 1397-1406.
42. Saunders JW Jr. 1948. The proximo-distal sequence of origin of the parts of the chick wing and the role of the ectoderm. J Exp Zool 108: 363-403.
43. Saunders JW Jr, Gasseling MP. 1968. Ectodermal-mesenchymalinteractions in the origin of limb symmetry. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
44. Saunders JW Jr, Gasseling MT, Cairns JM. 1955. Effect of implantation site on the development of an implant in the chick embryo. Nature 175: 673-674.
45. Stark RJ, Searls RL. 1973. A description of chick wing bud development and a model of limb morphogenesis. Dev Biol 33: 138-153.
46. Summerbell D. 1977. Regulation of the deficiencies along the proximal distal axis of the chick wing-bud: a quantitative analysis. J Embryol Exp Morphol 41: 137-159.
47. Summerbell D. 1981. Evidence for regulation of growth, size and pattern in the developing chick limb bud. J Embryol Exp Morphol 65(suppl): 129-150.
48. Summerbell D, Lewis JH. 1975. Time, place and positional value in the chick limb-bud. J Embryol Exp Morphol 33: 621-643.
49. Summerbell D, Lewis JH, Wolpert L. 1973. Positional information in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature 244: 492-496.
50. Swindell EC, Thaller C, Sockanathan S, Petkovich M, Jessell TM, Eichele G. 1999. Complementary domains of retinoic acid production and degradation in the early chick embryo. Dev Biol 216: 282-296.
51. Tamura K, Yokouchi Y, Kuroiwa A, Ide H. 1997. Retinoic acid changes the proximodistal developmental competence and affinity of distal cells in the developing chick limb bud. Dev Biol 188: 224-234.
52. Taylor GP, Anderson R, Reginelli AD, Muneoka K. 1994. FGF-2 induces regeneration of the chick limb bud. Dev Biol 163: 282-284.
53. Tickle C, Summerbell D, Wolpert L. 1975. Positional signalling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature 254: 199-202.
54. Towers M, Mahood R, Yin Y, Tickle C. 2008. Integration of growth and specification in chick wing digit-patterning. Nature 452: 882-886.
55. Vargesson N, Clarke JD, Vincent K, Coles C, Wolpert L, Tickle C. 1997. Cell fate in the chick limb bud and relationship to gene expression. Development 124: 1909-1918.
56. Wilkinson DG, Nieto MA. 1993. Detection of messenger RNA by in situ hybridization to tissue sections and whole mounts. Methods Enzymol 225: 361-373.
57. Wolff E, Hampe A. 1954. [Regulation of the chick foot after section of an intermediate segment from a limb bud]. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 148: 154-156.
58. Wyngaarden LA, Hopyan S. 2008. Plasticity of proximal-distal cell fate in the mammalian limb bud. Dev Biol 313: 225-233.
59. Yashiro K, Zhao X, Uehara M, Yamashita K, Nishijima M, Nishino J, Saijoh Y, Sakai Y, Hamada H. 2004. Regulation of retinoic acid distribution is required for proximodistal patterning and outgrowth of the developing mouse limb. Dev Cell 6: 411-422.
60. Zhu J, Nakamura E, Nguyen MT, Bao X, Akiyama H, Mackem S. 2008. Uncoupling Sonic hedgehog control of pattern and expansion of the developing limb bud. Dev Cell 14: 624-632.
61. Zwilling E. 1956. Interaction between limb-bud ectoderm and mesoderm in the chick embryo. II. Experimental limb duplication. J Exp Zool 132: 173-187.