Functional Characterization of Stem Cell Activity in the Mouse Mammary Gland

Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 238-247

  Bruno, Robert D ^a   Smith, Gilbert H ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Asymmetric DNA segregation; Ductal progenitor; Label retaining cells; Lobule progenitor; Mammary gland; Niche; Parity identified mammary epithelial cells; Stem cells

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIATION ANTIGEN;

ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; METABOLISM; MOUSE; REVIEW; STEM CELL; STEM CELL NICHE; UDDER;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; FEMALE; MAMMARY GLANDS, ANIMAL; MICE; STEM CELL NICHE; STEM CELLS;

EID: 79954994412     PISSN: 15508943     EISSN: 15586804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-010-9191-9     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Deome, K., Faulkin, L. J., Bern, H., & Blair, P. (1959). Development of mammary tumors from hyperplastic alveolar nodules transplanted into gland-free mammary fat pads of female C3H mice. Cancer Research, 19, 515-520.
2. Faulkin, L. J., Jr., & Deome, K. B. (1960). Regulation of growth and spacing of gland elements in the mammary fat pad of the C3H mouse. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 24, 953-969.
3. Daniel, C. W., & Deome, K. B. (1965). Growth of mouse mammary glands in vivo after monolayer culture. Science, 149, 634-636.
4. Daniel, C. W., Aidells, B. D., Medina, D., & Faulkin, L. J., Jr. (1975). Unlimited division potential of precancerous mouse mammary cells after spontaneous or carcinogen-induced transformation. Federation Proceedings, 34, 64-67.
5. Smith, G. H., & Medina, D. (1988). A morphologically distinct candidate for an epithelial stem cell in mouse mammary gland. Journal of Cell Science, 90(Pt 1), 173-183.
6. Kordon, E. C., & Smith, G. H. (1998). An entire functional mammary gland may comprise the progeny from a single cell. Development, 125, 1921-1930.
7. Smith, G. H. (1996). Experimental mammary epithelial morphogenesis in an in vivo model: evidence for distinct cellular progenitors of the ductal and lobular phenotype. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 39, 21-31.
8. Kamiya, K., Gould, M. N., & Clifton, K. H. (1998). Quantitative studies of ductal versus alveolar differentiation from rat mammary clonogens. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 219, 217-225.
9. Smith, G. H., & Boulanger, C. A. (2002). Mammary stem cell repertoire: new insights in aging epithelial populations. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 123, 1505-1519.
10. Wagner, K. U., Boulanger, C. A., Henry, M. D., Sgagias, M., Hennighausen, L., & Smith, G. H. (2002). An adjunct mammary epithelial cell population in parous females: its role in functional adaptation and tissue renewal. Development, 129, 1377-1386.
11. Boulanger, C. A., Wagner, K. U., & Smith, G. H. (2005). Parity-induced mouse mammary epithelial cells are pluripotent, self-renewing and sensitive to TGF-beta1 expression. Oncogene, 24, 552-560.
12. Boulanger, C. A., & Smith, G. H. (2001). Reducing mammary cancer risk through premature stem cell senescence. Oncogene, 20, 2264-2272.
13. Booth, B. W., Boulanger, C. A., & Smith, G. H. (2007). Alveolar progenitor cells develop in mouse mammary glands independent of pregnancy and lactation. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 212, 729-736.
14. Matulka, L. A., Triplett, A. A., & Wagner, K. U. (2007). Parity-induced mammary epithelial cells are multipotent and express cell surface markers associated with stem cells. Developmental Biology, 303, 29-44.
15. Stingl, J., Eirew, P., Ricketson, I., et al. (2006). Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells. Nature, 439, 993-997.
16. Kordon, E. C., McKnight, R. A., Jhappan, C., Hennighausen, L., Merlino, G., & Smith, G. H. (1995). Ectopic TGF beta 1 expression in the secretory mammary epithelium induces early senescence of the epithelial stem cell population. Developmental Biology, 168, 47-61.
17. Jeselsohn, R., Brown, N. E., Arendt, L., et al. (2010). Cyclin D1 kinase activity is required for the self-renewal of mammary stem and progenitor cells that are targets of MMTV-ErbB2 tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell, 17, 65-76.
18. Henry, M. D., Triplett, A. A., Oh, K. B., Smith, G. H., & Wagner, K. U. (2004). Parity-induced mammary epithelial cells facilitate tumorigenesis in MMTV-neu transgenic mice. Oncogene, 23, 6980-6985.
19. Li, Z., Tognon, C. E., Godinho, F. J., et al. (2007). ETV6-NTRK3 fusion oncogene initiates breast cancer from committed mammary progenitors via activation of AP1 complex. Cancer Cell, 12, 542-558.
20. Asselin-Labat, M. L., Sutherland, K. D., Barker, H., et al. (2007). Gata-3 is an essential regulator of mammary-gland morphogenesis and luminal-cell differentiation. Nature Cell Biology, 9, 201-209.
21. Sleeman, K. E., Kendrick, H., Robertson, D., Isacke, C. M., Ashworth, A., & Smalley, M. J. (2007). Dissociation of estrogen receptor expression and in vivo stem cell activity in the mammary gland. The Journal of Cell Biology, 176, 19-26.
22. Visvader, J. E. (2009). Keeping abreast of the mammary epithelial hierarchy and breast tumorigenesis. Genes & Development, 23, 2563-2577.
23. Cairns, J. (1975). Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature, 255, 197-200.
24. Potten, C. S., Owen, G., & Booth, D. (2002). Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. Journal of Cell Science, 115, 2381-2388.
25. Bickenbach, J. R. (1981). Identification and behavior of label-retaining cells in oral mucosa and skin. Journal of Dental Research, 60(Spec No C), 1611-1620.
26. Cotsarelis, G., Sun, T. T., & Lavker, R. M. (1990). Label-retaining cells reside in the bulge area of pilosebaceous unit: implications for follicular stem cells, hair cycle, and skin carcinogenesis. Cell, 61, 1329-1337.
27. Karpowicz, P., Morshead, C., Kam, A., et al. (2005). Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. The Journal of Cell Biology, 170, 721-732.
28. Smith, G. H. (2005). Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development, 132, 681-687.
29. Zeps, N., Dawkins, H. J., Papadimitriou, J. M., Redmond, S. L., & Walters, M. I. (1996). Detection of a population of long-lived cells in mammary epithelium of the mouse. Cell and Tissue Research, 286, 525-536.
30. Zeps, N., Bentel, J. M., Papadimitriou, J. M., D'Antuono, M. F., & Dawkins, H. J. (1998). Estrogen receptor-negative epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland development and growth. Differentiation, 62, 221-226.
31. Booth, B. W., & Smith, G. H. (2006). Estrogen receptor-alpha and progesterone receptor are expressed in label-retaining mammary epithelial cells that divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Breast Cancer Research, 8, R49.
32. Booth, B. W., Boulanger, C. A., & Smith, G. H. (2008). Selective segregation of DNA strands persists in long-label-retaining mammary cells during pregnancy. Breast Cancer Research, 10, R90.
33. Klar, A. J. (2004). A genetic mechanism implicates chromosome 11 in schizophrenia and bipolar diseases. Genetics, 167, 1833-1840.
34. Klar, A. J. (1994). A model for specification of the left-right axis in vertebrates. Trends in Genetics, 10, 392-396.
35. Klar, A. J. (2008). Support for the selective chromatid segregation hypothesis advanced for the mechanism of left-right body axis development in mice. Breast Disease, 29, 47-56.
36. Klar, A. J. (1987). Differentiated parental DNA strands confer developmental asymmetry on daughter cells in fission yeast. Nature, 326, 466-470.
37. Armakolas, A., & Klar, A. J. (2006). Cell type regulates selective segregation of mouse chromosome 7 DNA strands in mitosis. Science, 311, 1146-1149.
38. Schofield, R. (1978). The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells, 4, 7-25.
39. Boulanger, C. A., Mack, D. L., Booth, B. W., & Smith, G. H. (2007). Interaction with the mammary microenvironment redirects spermatogenic cell fate in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 3871-3876.
40. Booth, B. W., Mack, D. L., Androutsellis-Theotokis, A., McKay, R. D., Boulanger, C. A., & Smith, G. H. (2008). The mammary microenvironment alters the differentiation repertoire of neural stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 14891-14896.
41. Boulanger, C. A., & Smith, G. H. (2009). Reprogramming cell fates in the mammary microenvironment. Cell Cycle, 8, 1127-1132.
42. Klinowska, T. C., Alexander, C. M., Georges-Labouesse, E., et al. (2001). Epithelial development and differentiation in the mammary gland is not dependent on alpha 3 or alpha 6 integrin subunits. Developmental Biology, 233, 449-467.
43. Bussard, K. M., Boulanger, C. A., Booth, B. W., Bruno, R. D., & Smith, G. H. (2010). Reprogramming human cancer cells in the mouse mammary gland. Cancer Research, 70, 6336-6343.
44. Brisken, C., Park, S., Vass, T., Lydon, J. P., O'Malley, B. W., & Weinberg, R. A. (1998). A paracrine role for the epithelial progesterone receptor in mammary gland development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 5076-5081.
45. Mallepell, S., Krust, A., Chambon, P., & Brisken, C. (2006). Paracrine signaling through the epithelial estrogen receptor alpha is required for proliferation and morphogenesis in the mammary gland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 2196-2201.
46. Taddei, I., Deugnier, M. A., Faraldo, M. M., et al. (2008). Beta1 integrin deletion from the basal compartment of the mammary epithelium affects stem cells. Nature Cell Biology, 10, 716-722.
47. Quyn, A. J., Appleton, P. L., Carey, F. A., et al. (2010). Spindle orientation bias in gut epithelial stem cell compartments is lost in precancerous tissue. Cell Stem Cell, 6, 175-181.
48. Mathur, D., Bost, A., Driver, I., & Ohlstein, B. (2010). A transient niche regulates the specification of Drosophila intestinal stem cells. Science, 327, 210-213.