Brain Plasticity: The impact of the environment on the brain as it relates to hearing and deafness

Cochlear Implants: Principles and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 19-37

  Ryugo, David K ^a   Limb, Charles J ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN PLASTICITY;

AUDITION;

EID: 79954614383     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (117)

1. Spalding DA. Instinct, with original observations on young animals. Macmillan's Magazine, 1873;27:282-293. Reprinted in Brit J Anim Behav 1954;2:2-11.
2. Heinroth O. Beiträge zur Biologie, nahmentlich Ethologie und Psychologie der Anatiden. Verh. 5 int. orn. Kongr. Berlin, 1911:589-702.
3. Lorenz K. Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels; die Artgenosse als auslösendes Moment sozialer Verhaltungsweisen. J. Ornithol. 1935;83:137-213. Also in English translation: Companionship in bird life: fellow members of the species as releasers of social behavior. In: Schiller CH, ed. Instinctive Behavior. New York: International University Press, 1957.
4. Konishi M. Birdsong: from behavior to neuron. Annu Rev Neurosci 1985;8:125-170.
5. Marler P, Tamura M. Song variation in three populations of white-crowned sparrow. Condor 1962;64:368-377.
6. Whaling CS, Solis MM, Doupe AJ, et al. Acoustic and neural bases for innate recognition of song. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:12694-12698.
7. Kuhl PK. Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Percept Psychophys 1991;50: 93-107.
8. Goodsitt JV, Morgan JL, Kuhl PK. Perceptual strategies in prelingual speech segmentation. J Child Lang 1993;20: 229-252.
9. Lane H. The Wild Boy of Aveyron. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.
10. Shattuck R. The Forbidden Experiment. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1980.
11. Wiesel TN, Hubel DH, Lam D. Autoradiographic demonstration of ocular dominance columns in the monkey striate cortex by means of transsynaptic transport. Brain Res 1974;79:273-279.
12. Raviola E, Wiesel TN. An animal model of myopia. New Engl J Med 1985;312:1609-1615.
13. LeVay S, Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. The postnatal development and plasticity of ocular-dominance columns in the monkey. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG, Adelman G, et al., eds. The Organization of Cerebral Cortex: Proceedings of a Neuroscience Research Program Colloquium. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1981:29-45.
14. Welker C, Woolsey TA. Structure of layer IV in the somatosensory neocortex of the rat: description and comparison with the mouse. J Comp Neurol 1974;158:437-454.
15. Killackey HP, Belford G, Ryugo R, et al. Anomalous organization of thalamocortical projections consequent to vibrissae removal in the newborn rat and mouse. Brain Res 1976;104:309-315.
16. Rice FL, van der Loos H. Development of the barrels and barrel field in the somatosensory cortex of the mouse. J Comp Neurol 1977;171:545-560.
17. Van der Loos H, Woolsey TA. Somatosensory cortex: structural alterations following early injury to sense organs. Science 1973;179:395-398.
18. Weller WL, Johnson JI. Barrels in cerebral cortex altered receptor disruption in newborn, but not in five-day-old mice (Cricetidae and Muridae). Brain Res 1975;83:504-508.
19. Shatz CJ, Stryker MP. Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex and the effects of monocular deprivation. J Physiol 1978;281:267-283.
20. Roe AW, Pallas SL, Hahm J-O, et al. A map of visual space induced in primary auditory cortex. Science 1990;250: 818-820.
21. Crair MC, Gillespie DC, Stryker MP. The role of visual experience in the development of columns in cat visual cortex. Science 1998;279:566-570.
22. Knudsen EI. Capacity for plasticity in the adult owl auditory system expanded by juvenile experience. Science 1998;279:1531-1533.
23. Knudsen EI, Knudsen PF. Vision calibrates sound localization in developing barn owls. J Neurosci 1989;9:3306-3313.
24. Knudsen EI, Esterly SD, du Lac S. Stretched and upsidedown maps of auditory space in the optic tectum of blindreared owls: acoustic basis and behavioral correlates. J Neurosci 1991;11:1727-1747.
25. DeBello WM, Feldman DE, Knudsen EI. Adaptive axonal remodeling in the midbrain auditory space map. J Neurosci 2001;21:3161-3174.
26. Linkenhoker BA, von der Ohe CG, Knudsen EI. Anatomical traces of juvenile learning in the auditory system of adult barn owls. Nat Neurosci 2005;8:93-98.
27. Ramón y Cajal R. Histologie du Système Nerveux de l'Homme et des Vertébrés. Madrid: Instituto Ramón y Cajal, 1909:774-838.
28. Jeffress LA. A place theory of sound localization. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1948;41:35-39.
29. Carr CE, Konishi M. A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl. J Neurosci 1990;10:3227-3246.
30. Yin T, Chan J. Interaural time sensitivity in medial superior olive of cat. J. Neurophysiol. 1990;64:465-488.
31. Scheibel ME, Scheibel AB. Neuropil organization in the superior olive of the cat. Exp Neurol 1974;43:339-348.
32. Stotler WA. An experimental study of the cells and connections of the superior olivary complex of the cat. J Comp Neurol 1953;98:401-432.
33. Cant NB, Casseday JH. Projections from the anteroventral cochlear nucleus to the lateral and medial superior olivary nuclei. J Comp Neuro 1986;247:457-476.
34. Benes FM, Parks TN, Rubel EW. Rapid dendritic atrophy following deafferentation: an EM morphometric analysis. Brain Res 1977;122:1-13.
35. Russell FA, Moore DR. Effects of unilateral cochlear removal on dendrites in the gerbil medial superior olivary nucleus. Eur J Neurosci 1999;11:1379-1390.
36. West CD, Harrison JM. Transneuronal cell atrophy in the deaf white cat. J Comp Neurol 1973;151:377-398.
37. Schwartz IR, Higa JF. Correlated studies of the ear and brainstem in the deaf white cat: changes in the spiral ganglion and the medial superior olivary nucleus. Acta Otolaryngol 1982;93:9-18.
38. Bregmann AS. Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1994.
39. Trune DR. Influence of neonatal cochlear removal on the development of mouse cochlear nucleus: I. Number, size, and density of its neurons. J Comp Neurol 1982;209: 409-424.
40. Hashisaki GT, Rubel EW. Effects of unilateral cochlea removal on anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons in developing gerbils. J Comp Neurol 1989;283:465-473.
41. Powell TPS, Erulkar SD. Transneuronal cell degeneration in the auditory relay nuclei of the cat. J Anat 1962;96: 219-268.
42. Born DE, Rubel EW. Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: neuron number and size following cochlea removal. J Comp Neurol 1985;231:435-445.
43. Moore DR, King AJ, McAlpine D, et al. Functional consequences of neonatal unilateral cochlear removal. Prog Brain Res 1993;97:127-133.
44. Sie KCY, Rubel EW. Rapid changes in protein synthesis and cell size in the cochlear nucleus following eighth nerve activity blockade or cochlea ablation. J Comp Neurol 1992;320:501-508.
45. Bosher SK, Hallpike CS. Observations on the histological features, development and pathogenesis of the inner ear degeneration of the deaf white cat. Proc Roy Soc B 1965; 162:147-170.
46. Mair IW. Hereditary deafness in the white cat. Acta Otolaryngol 1973;314:1-48.
47. Saada AA, Niparko JK, Ryugo DK. Morphological changes in the cochlear nucleus of congenitally deaf white cats. Brain Res 1996;106:1274-1279.
48. Ryugo DK, Pongstaporn T, Huchton DM, et al. Ultrastructural analysis of primary endings in deaf white cats: morphologic alterations in endbulbs of Held. J Comp Neurol 1997;385:230-244.
49. Ryugo DK, Rosenbaum BT, Kim PJ, et al. Single unit recordings in the auditory nerve of congenitally deaf white cats: morphological correlates in the cochlea and cochlear nucleus. J Comp Neurol 1998;397:532-548.
50. Ryugo DK, Krezmer EA, Niparko JK. Restoration of auditory nerve synapses by cochlear implants. Science 2005;310:1490-1492.
51. Klinke R, Kral A, Heid S, et al. Recruitment of the auditory cortex in congenitally deaf cats by long-term cochlear electrostimulation. Science 1999;285:1729-1733.
52. Kral A, Tillein J. Brain plasticity under cochlear implant stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006;64:89-108.
53. Cohen, LG, Celnik P, Pascual-Leone A, et al. Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature 1997;389:180-183.
54. Lessard N, Paré M, Lepore F, et al. Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects. Nature 1998;395:278-280.
55. Gougoux F, Lepore F, Lassonde FM, et al. Neuropsychology: pitch discrimination in the early blind. Nature 2004;430: 309.
56. Merzenich MM, Nelson RJ, Stryker MP, et al. Somatosensory map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1984;224:591-605.
57. Kalaska J, Pomeranz B. Chronic paw denervation causes an age-dependent appearance of novel 57 responses from forearm in "paw cortex" of kittens and adult cats. J Neurophysiol 1979;42:618-633.
58. Rasmusson DD. Reorganization of raccoon somatosensory cortex following removal of the fifth digit. J Comp Neurol 1982;205:313-326.
59. Wall JT, Cusick CG. Cutaneous responsiveness in primary somatosensory (S-I) hindpaw cortex before and after partial hindpaw deafferentation in adult rats. J Neurosci 1984;4:1499-1515.
60. Calford MD, Tweedale R. Immediate and chronic changes in responses of somatosensory cortex in adult flying- fox after digit amputation. Nature 1988;332:446-448.
61. Fuhr P, Cohen LG, Dang N, et al. Physiological analysis of motor reorganization following lower limb amputation. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992;85:53-60.
62. Kew JJ, Ridding MC, Rothwell JC, et al. Reorganization of cortical blood flow and transcranial magnetic stimulation maps in human subjects after upper limb amputation. J Neurophysiol 1994;72:2517-2524.
63. Yang TT, Galleon CC, Cobb S, et al. Noninvasive detection of cerebral plasticity in adult human somatosensory cortex. NeuroReport 1994;5:701-704.
64. Knecht S, Henningsen H, Elbert T, et al. Cortical reorganization in human amputees and mislocalization of painful stimuli to the phantom limb. Neurosci Lett 1995; 201:262-264.
65. Kaas JH, Krubitzer LA, Chino YM, et al. Reorganization of retinotopic cortical maps in adult mammals after lesions of the retina. Science 1990;248:229-231.
66. Schmid LM, Rosa MGP, Calford MD, et al. Visuotopic reorganization in the primary cortex of adult cats following monocular and binocular retinal lesions. Cereb Cortex 1996;6:388-405.
67. Robertson D, Irvine D. Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness. J Comp Neurol 1989;282:456-471.
68. Rajan R, Irvine DRF, Wise LZ, et al. Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation for lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol 1993;338:17-49.
69. Schwaber MK, Garrachty PE, Kaas JH. Neuroplasticity of the adult primate auditory cortex following cochlear hearing loss. Am J Otol 1993;14:252-258.
70. Florence SL, Taub HB, Kass JH. Large-scale sprouting of cortical connections after peripheral injury in adult macaque monkeys. Science 1998;282:1117-1121.
71. Jones EG, Pons TP. Thalamic and brainstem contributions to large-scale plasticity of primate somatosensory cortex. Science 1998;282:1121-1125.
72. Recanzone GH, Schreiner CE, Merzenich MM. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. J Neurosci 1993;13:87-104.
73. Wright BA. Why and how we study human learning on basic auditory tasks. Audiol Neurootol 2001;6:207-210.
74. Wright BA, Zhang Y. A review of learning with normal and altered sound-localization cues in human adults. Int J Audiol 2006;45:92-98.
75. Pavlov IP. Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. (Translated by Anrep GV.) London: Oxford University Press, 1927.
76. Weinberger NM, Javid R, Lepan B. Long-term retention of learning-induced receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:2394-2398.
77. Schwab ME, Thallmair M, Metz GAS, et al. Neurite growth inhibitors restrict plasticity and functional recovery following corticospinal tract lesions. Nature Neurosci 1998;1:124-131.
78. Quittner AL, Steck JT. Predictors of cochlear implant use in children. Am J Otol 1991;12(Suppl):89-94.
79. Fryauf-Bertschy H, Tyler RS, Kelsay DM, et al. Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:913-920.
80. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH. The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;108:329-333.
81. Gantz BJ, Tyler RS, Woodwort GG, et al. Results of multichannel cochlear implants in congenital and acquired prelingual deafness in children: five-year follow-up. Am J Otol 1994;2(Suppl):1-7.
82. Tyler RS, Summerfield AQ. Cochlear implantation: relationships with research on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear Hear 1996;17(Suppl):38S-50S.
83. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Gomolin RH, et al. Long-term results of early cochlear implantation in congenitally and prelingually deafened children. Am J Otol 1994; 15(Suppl 2):9-13.
84. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Gomolin RH, et al. Open-set speech perception in congenitally deaf children using cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997;18:342-349.
85. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL. Cochlear implantation in children younger than 2 years old. Am J Otol 1998;19:158-162.
86. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH. Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on patients using a cochlear prosthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;105: 797-801.
87. Zwolan TA, Collings LM, Wakefield GH. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;102:3673-3685.
88. NIH Consensus Statement. May 1995;15-17;13(2):1-30.
89. Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM, Johnston P, et al. Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science 1996;271:77-81.
90. Tallal P, Miller SL, Bedi G, et al. Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech. Science 1996;271:81-84.
91. Snyder RL, Rebscher SJ, Cao K, et al. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation. Hear Res 1990;50:7-33.
92. Leake PA, Snyder RL, Hradek GT, et al. Consequences of chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats. Hear Res 1995;82:65-80.
93. Gerken GM. Temporal summation of pulsate brain stimulation in normal and deafened cats. J Acoust Soc Am 1979;66:728-734.
94. Moore JK, Niparko JK, Miller MR, et al. Effect of profound hearing loss on a central auditory nucleus. Am J Otol 1994;15:588-595.
95. Moore JK, Niparko JK, Perazzo LM, et al. Effect of adultonset deafness on the human central auditory system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997;106:385-390.
96. Boex C, Baud L, Cosendai G, et al. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006;7:110-124.
97. Limb CJ. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;14:337-340.
98. Loeb GE. Are cochlear implant patients suffering from perceptual dissonance? Ear Hear 2005;26:435-450.
99. Chen H, Ishihara YC, Zeng FG. Pitch discrimination of patterned electric stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;118: 338-345.
100. Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, et al. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;82:106-115.
101. Eddington DK. Speech recognition in deaf subjects with multichannel intracochlear electrodes. Ann NY Acad Sci 1983;405:241-258.
102. Hartmann R, Topp G, Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 1984;13:47-62.
103. Niparko JK, Pfingst B, Johansson C, et al. Cochlear wall titanium implants for auditory nerve stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:447-454.
104. Shannon RV. Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;85:2587-2592.
105. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH, et al. The prognostic value of round window electrical stimulation in cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;103:102-106.
106. Snyder RL, Rebscher SJ, Leake PA, et al. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. II. Temporal properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus. Hear Res 1991;56:246-264.
107. Hochmair-Desoyer E, Hochmair-Desoyer I, Stiglbrunner H. Psychoacoustic temporal processing and speech understanding in cochlear implant patients. In: Schindler RA, Merzenich MM, eds. Cochlear Implants. New York: Raven Press, 1985:291-304.
108. Pfeiffer RR. Anteroventral cochlear nucleus: wave forms of extracellularly recorded spike potentials. Science 1966;154: 667-668.
109. Offeciers E, Morera C, Muller J, et al. International consensus on bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:918-919.
110. Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Witt SA, et al. Update on bilateral cochlear implantation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;11:388-393.
111. Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Rubinstein JT, et al. Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2002;23(Suppl):80S-89S.
112. Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M, et al. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:958-968.
113. Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, et al. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:648-655.
114. Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese P. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear 2004;25: 197-204.
115. Schoen F, Mueller J, Helms J, et al. Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:429-437.
116. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, et al. Auditory system plasticity in children after long periods of complete deafness. NeuroReport 1996;8:61-65.
117. Sharma A, Martin K, Roland P, et al. P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16: 564-573.