Creating a Corpus of Targeted Learning Resources with a Web-Based Open Authoring Tool

IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-9

  Aleahmad, Turadg ^a   Aleven, Vincent ^a   Kraut, Robert ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

authoring systems; Educational technology; personalization; technology social factors

Indexed keywords

AUTHORING SYSTEMS; AUTHORING TOOL; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; LEARNING CONTENTS; LEARNING MATERIALS; LEARNING RESOURCE; OPEN ACCESS; PERSONALIZATION; PERSONALIZED LEARNING; TAILORING TOOLS; WEB-BASED TOOLS;

STUDENTS; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY;

MATERIALS;

EID: 79954544725     PISSN: 19391382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2009.8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. H.-Y. Ku and H. Sullivan, “Student Performance and Attitudes Using Personalized Mathematics Instruction,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 21–34, 2002.
2. P.G. Anand and S.M. Ross, “Using Computer-Assisted Instruction to Personalize Arithmetic Materials for Elementary School Children,” J. Educational Psychology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 72–78, Mar. 1987.
3. C. Lopez and H. Sullivan, “Effect of Personalization of Instructional Context on the Achievement and Attitudes of Hispanic Students,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 5–14, 1992.
4. J.R. Anderson, Rules of the Mind. Erlbaum, 1993.
5. T. Murray, “Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Analysis of the State of the Art,” Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 10, pp. 98–129, 1999.
6. Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments, T. Murray, S. Blessing, and S. Ainsworth, eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
7. S. Ainsworth, “Using a Single Authoring Environment across the Lifespan of Learning,” J. Educational Technology and Soc., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 22, 2007.
8. S. Ritter, J. Anderson, M. Cytrynowicz, and O. Medvedeva, “Authoring Content in the PAT Algebra Tutor,” J. Interactive Media in Education, vol. 98, no. 9, p. 2, 1998.
9. V. Aleven, B.M. McLaren, J. Sewall, and K.R. Koedinger, “Example-Tracing Tutors: A New Paradigm for Intelligent Tutoring Systems,” Int'l J. Artificial Intelligence in Education, to appear.
10. T.E. Turner, M.A. Macasek, G. Nuzzo-Jones, and N.T. Heffernan, “The Assistment Builder: A Rapid Development Tool for Its,” Proc. 12th Ann. Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 929–931, 2005.
11. R. Baraniuk, C.S. Burrus, B. Hendricks, G. Henry, A. Hero, D.H. Johnson, D.L. Jones, R. Nowak, J. Odegard, L. Potter, R. Reedstrom, P. Schniter, I. Selesnick, D. Williams, and W. Wilson., “Connexions: Education for a Networked World,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '02), 2002.
12. T. Aleahmad, V. Aleven, and R. Kraut, “Open Community Authoring of Targeted Worked Example Problems,” Proc. Ninth Int'l Conf Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 216–227, 2008.
13. A. Renkl and R.K. Atkinson, “Learning from Examples: Fostering Self-Explanations in Computer-Based Learning Environments,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 105–119, 2002.
14. B.M. McLaren, S.-J. Lim, F. Gagnon, D. Yaron, and K.R. Koedinger, “Studying the Effects of Personalized Language and Worked Examples in the Context of a Web-Based Intelligent Tutor,” Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS '06), pp. 318–328, 2006.
15. R. Schwonke, J. Wittwer, V. Aleven, R. Salden, C. Krieg, and A. Renkl, “Can Tutored Problem Solving Benefit from Faded Worked-Out Examples?” Proc. European Cognitive Science Conf, pp. 23–27, 2007.
16. L.S. Shulman, “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching,” Educational Researcher, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 4–14, 1986.
17. D.A. Small and G. Loewenstein, “Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability,” J. Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 5–16, 2003.
18. M.J. Nathan and A. Petrosino, “Expert Blind Spot Among Preservice Teachers,” Am. Educational Research J., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 905–928, 2003.
19. J. Pennebaker, M. Francis, and R. Booth, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC. Erlbaum Publishers, 2001.
20. J. Kincaid, R. Fishburne, R. Rodgers, and B. Chissom, “Derivation of New Readability Formulas for Navy Enlisted Personnel,” Research Branch Report 8–75, Naval Air Station Memphis, Millington, Tennessee, Feb. 1975.
21. R. Cheng and J. Vassileva, “Design and Evaluation of an Adaptive Incentive Mechanism for Sustained Educational Online Communities,” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 16, nos. 3–4, pp. 321–348, 2006.