Essentials of quantitative angiography for bifurcation lesions

EuroIntervention

Volumn 6, Issue SUPPL. J, 2010, Pages

  Girasis, Chrysafios ^a   Van Geuns, Robert Jan ^a   Onuma, Yoshinobu ^a   Serruys, Patrick W ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY BIFURCATION LESION; CORONARY STENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; QUANTITATIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 79954517122     PISSN: 1774024X     EISSN: 19696213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4244/eijv6supja7     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Serruys PW, Wijns W, van den Brand M, Ribeiro V, Fioretti P, Simoons ML, Kooijman CJ, Reiber JH, Hugenholtz PG. Is transluminal coronary angioplasty mandatory after successful thrombolysis? Quantitative coronary angiographic study. Br Heart J 1983;50:257-65. (Pubitemid 13000438)
2. Reiber JH, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ, Wijns W, Slager CJ, Gerbrands JJ, Schuurbiers JC, den Boer A, Hugenholtz PG. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 1985;71:280-8. (Pubitemid 15157088)
3. Serruys PW, Kay IP, Disco C, Deshpande NV, de Feyter PJ. Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: results of a meta-analysis of the BElgian NEtherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter Ultrasound Stent In Coronaries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1067-74. (Pubitemid 29500540)
4. Mauri L, Orav EJ, Kuntz RE. Late loss in lumen diameter and binary restenosis for drug-eluting stent comparison. Circulation 2005;111:3435-42. (Pubitemid 40923397)
5. Pocock SJ, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Popma JJ, Fahy MP, Na Y, Dangas G, Moses JW, Pucelikova T, Kandzari DE and others. Angiographic surrogate end points in drug-eluting stent trials: a systematic evaluation based on individual patient data from 11 randomized, controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:23-32.
6. Zijlstra F, van Ommeren J, Reiber JH, Serruys PW. Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis? Circulation 1987;75:1154-61.
7. Zijlstra F, Fioretti P, Reiber JH, Serruys PW. Which cineangiographically assessed anatomic variable correlates best with functional measurements of stenosis severity? A comparison of quantitative analysis of the coronary cineangiogram with measured coronary flow reserve and exercise/redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:686-91.
8. Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, Chae IH, Choi DJ, Kim HS, Sohn DW, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB and others. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:633-7.
9. Goktekin O, Kaplan S, Dimopoulos K, Barlis P, Tanigawa J, Vatankulu MA, Koning G, Tuinenburg JC, Mario CD. A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: comparison with current conventional methods. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:172-80. (Pubitemid 46214248)
10. Ramcharitar S, Onuma Y, Aben JP, Consten C, Weijers B, Morel MA, Serruys PW. A novel dedicated quantitative coronary analysis methodology for bifurcation lesions. EuroIntervention 2008;3:553-7.
11. Lansky A, Tuinenburg J, Costa M, Maeng M, Koning G, Popma J, Cristea E, Gavit L, Costa R, Rares A and others. Quantitative angiographic methods for bifurcation lesions: a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Group. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:258-66.
12. Girasis C, Schuurbiers JC, Onuma Y, Aben JP, Weijers B, Boersma E, Wentzel JJ, Serruys PW. Two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic models for bifurcation segmental analysis: In vitro validation of caas against precision manufactured plexiglas phantoms. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; in press.
13. Green NE, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Carroll JD. Three-dimensional vascular angiography. Curr Probl Cardiol 2004;29:104-42.
14. Wellnhofer E, Wahle A, Mugaragu I, Gross J, Oswald H, Fleck E. Validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections. Int J Card Imaging 1999;15:339-53; discussion 355-6.
15. Messenger JC, Chen SY, Carroll JD, Burchenal JE, Kioussopoulos K, Groves BM. 3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients. Int J Card Imaging 2000;16:413-27. (Pubitemid 32674316)
16. Dvir D, Marom H, Guetta V, Kornowski R. Three-dimensional coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: in vivo quantitative validation. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2005;7:141-5. (Pubitemid 41503232)
17. Ramcharitar S, Daeman J, Patterson M, van Guens RJ, Boersma E, Serruys PW, van der Giessen WJ. First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;71:44-50. (Pubitemid 351158345)
18. Schuurbiers JC, Lopez NG, Ligthart J, Gijsen FJ, Dijkstra J, Serruys PW, Van der Steen AF, Wentzel JJ. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:620-6.
19. Schlundt C, Kreft JG, Fuchs F, Achenbach S, Daniel WG, Ludwig J. Three-dimensional on-line reconstruction of coronary bifurcated lesions to optimize side-branch stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;68:249-53. (Pubitemid 44167676)
20. Onuma Y, Girasis C, Aben JP, Sarno G, Piazza N, Lokkerbol C, Morel MA, Serruys PW. A novel dedicated 3-dimensional quantitative coronary analysis methodology for bifurcation lesions. EuroIntervention 2010; in press.
21. Louvard Y, Thomas M, Dzavik V, Hildick-Smith D, Galassi AR, Pan M, Burzotta F, Zelizko M, Dudek D, Ludman P and others. Classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: time for a consensus! Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;71:175-83.
22. Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M. A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006;59:183.
23. Serruys PW, Reiber JH, Wijns W, van den Brand M, Kooijman CJ, ten Katen HJ, Hugenholtz PG. Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:482-8. (Pubitemid 14073230)
24. Scoblionko DP, Brown BG, Mitten S, Caldwell JH, Kennedy JW, Bolson EL, Dodge HT. A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:689-93. (Pubitemid 14154677)
25. Katritsis D, Lythall DA, Anderson MH, Cooper IC, Webb-Peploe MW. Assessment of coronary angioplasty by an automated digital angiographic method. Am Heart J 1988;116:1181-7. (Pubitemid 18265635)
26. Detre KM, Wright E, Murphy ML, Takaro T. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation 1975;52:979-86.
27. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 1976;53:627-32.
28. DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W. Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms. Circulation 1977;55:324-8. (Pubitemid 8031070)
29. Girasis C, Onuma Y, Schuurbiers JC, Morel MA, Wentzel JJ, Serruys PW. Visual Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Phantom Bifurcation Lesions: A Survey in Experts 2009; Berlin.
30. Huo Y, Kassab GS. A scaling law of vascular volume. Biophys J 2009;96:347-53.
31. Finet G, Gilard M, Perrenot B, Rioufol G, Motreff P, Gavit L, Prost R. Fractal geometry of arterial coronary bifurcations: a quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound analysis. EuroIntervention 2008;3:490-8.
32. Dzavik V, Kharbanda R, Ivanov J, Ing DJ, Bui S, Mackie K, Ramsamujh R, Barolet A, Schwartz L, Seidelin PH. Predictors of longterm outcome after crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: importance of the bifurcation angle. Am Heart J 2006;152:762-9. (Pubitemid 44396889)
33. Girasis C, Schuurbiers JC, Onuma Y, Serruys PW, Wentzel JJ. Novel bifurcation phantoms for validation of quantitative coronary angiography algorithms. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; in press.
34. Girasis C, Serruys PW. Dedicated Software for Bifurcation QCA: Pie Medical (CAAS 5.9) and MEDIS (QAngio XA 7.2.34.0) Validation on Phantom analysis. 2010; Budapest.
35. Koo BK, Park KW, Kang HJ, Cho YS, Chung WY, Youn TJ, Chae IH, Choi DJ, Tahk SJ, Oh BH and others. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2008;29:726-32.
36. Sarno G, Garg S, Onuma Y, Girasis C, Tonino P, Morel MA, Van Es GA, Pijls N, Serruys PW. Bifurcation lesions: Novel anatomical evaluation by Quantitative Coronary Angiogram versus functional assessment by Fractional Flow Reserve. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2010;submitted.
37. Green NE, Chen SY, Hansgen AR, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Carroll JD. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computergenerated views. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;64:451-9. (Pubitemid 40463442)
38. Gollapudi RR, Valencia R, Lee SS, Wong GB, Teirstein PS, Price MJ. Utility of three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:479-82. (Pubitemid 46363846)
39. Sadamatsu K, Sagara S, Yamawaki T, Tashiro H. Three-dimensional coronary imaging for the ostium of the left anterior descending artery. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:223-8.
40. Tu S, Koning G, Jukema W, Reiber JH. Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26:5-17.
41. Wahle A, Wellnhofer E, Mugaragu I, Saner HU, Oswald H, Fleck E. Assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of coronary morphology based upon 3-D reconstruction from biplane angiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995;14:230-41.
42. Garcia JA, Movassaghi B, Casserly IP, Klein AJ, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Hansgen A, Wink O, Groves BM, Carroll JD. Determination of optimal viewing regions for X-ray coronary angiography based on a quantitative analysis of 3D reconstructed models. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:455-62.
43. Bruining N, Tanimoto S, Otsuka M, Weustink A, Ligthart J, de Winter S, van Mieghem C, Nieman K, de Feyter PJ, van Domburg RT and others. Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a bioabsorbable poly-L-lactic acid stent design in the acute phase: a comparison between 2- and 3D-QCA, QCU and QMSCT-CA. EuroIntervention 2008;4:285-91.
44. Tsuchida K, van der Giessen WJ, Patterson M, Tanimoto S, Garcia-Garcia HM, Regar E, Ligthart JM, Maugenest AM, Maatrijk G, Wentzel JJ and others. In vivo validation of a novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system (CardiOp-B): comparison with a conventional two-dimensional system (CAAS II) and with special reference to optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention 2007;3:100-8.
45. Girasis C, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Jr., Feldman TE, Bass EJ, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, Morice MC. 3-Dimensional Bifurcation Angle Analysis in Patients With Left Main Disease A Substudy of the SYNTAX Trial (SYNergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXus and Cardiac Surgery). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:41-48.