Morphology and microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to in situ-formed caries-affected dentin after the use of a papain-based chemomechanical gel method

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 13-19

  Amaral, Flávia Lucisano Botelho ^a   Flório, Flávia Martão ^a   Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria Bovi ^b   Basting, Roberta Tarkany ^a  

^a SÃO LEOPOLDO MANDIC INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADPER SINGLE BOND 2; CLEARFIL SE BOND; CLEARFIL TRI S BOND; CLEARFIL TRI-S BOND; PAPACARIE; PAPAIN; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; HUMANS; PAPAIN; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 79954500101     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Francken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry. A review. FDI Commission Project 1 -97. Int Dent J 2000;50:11-12.
2. Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentine: Diagnosis and treatment. Oper Dent 1979;4:63-70.
3. Bjømdal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res 1997;31:411-417. (Pubitemid 127520710)
4. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW, Ergle JW, Rueggerberg FA, Adair SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: Results at year 10. JAm Dent Assoc 1998;129:55-66. (Pubitemid 128454233)
5. Nadanovsky P, Carneiro FC, Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: A comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods. Caries Res 2001;35:384-389. (Pubitemid 33643779)
6. Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Frencken JE, van't Hof M. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ATR and conventional cavity preparation in primary molars. Am J Dent 2006;19:359-363.
7. Uribe S. Partial caries removal in symptomless teeth reduces the risk of pulp exposure. Evid Based Dent 2006;7:94.
8. Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries excavation: A review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J 2000; 188:476-482.
9. Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ. Does chemomechanical caries removal affect dentine adhesion? Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:449-455.
10. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwing E. Chemomechanical caries removal: A comprehensive review of the literature. Int Dent J. 2001;51:291-299. (Pubitemid 33721400)
11. Azrak B, Callaway A, Grundheber A, Stender E, Willershausen B. Comparison of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) with that of conventional excavation in reducing the cariogenic flora. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004;14:182-191. (Pubitemid 38716404)
12. Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Mokrys K, Kaup M, Reiner Ott KH. Reaction of sound and demineralised dentine to Carisolv in vivo and in vitro. J Dent 2002;30:59-65. (Pubitemid 40433462)
13. Topaloglu-Ak A, Eden E, Frencken JE, Oncag O. Two years survival rate of class II composite resin restorations prepared by ART with and without a chemomechanical caries removal gel in primary molars. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:325-332.
14. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvão AC. Papain gel: A new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005;30:115-119. (Pubitemid 43471926)
15. Ahmed AAR, Garcia-Godoy F, Kunzelmann K-H. Self-limiting caries therapy with proteolytic agents. Am J Dent 2008;21:303-312.
16. Flindt M. Health and safety aspects of working with enzymes. Process Biochem 1979;13:3-7.
17. Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Hermida Bruno ML, Ram D. Chemo-mechanical removal of caries in an adolescent patient using a papain gel: Case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;32:177-180.
18. Gianini RJ, Amaral FLB, Flório FM, Basting RT. Microtensile bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems to demineralized dentin after the use of a papain-based chemomechanical method. Am J Dent 2010;23:23-28.
19. Lopes MC, Mascarini RC, Silva, BMCG, Flório FM, Basting RT. Effect of papain-based gel for chemomechanical caries removal on dentin shear bond strength. J Dent Child (Chic) 2007;74:93-97.
20. White DJ. The application of in vitro models to research on demin-eralization and remineralization of the teeth. Adv Dent Res 1995;9:175-193.
21. Hara AT, Queiroz CS, Giannini M, Cury JA, Serra MC. Influence of the mineral content and morphological pattern of artificial root caries lesion on composite resin bond strength. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:67-72. (Pubitemid 38656000)
22. Erhardt MC, Rodrigues JA, Valentino TA, Ritter AV, Pimenta LA. In vitro muTBS of one-bottle adhesive systems: Sound versus artificially-created cariesaffected dentin. JBiomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;86:181-187. (Pubitemid 351874382)
23. Zero DT. Insitu caries models. Adv Dent Res 1995;9:214-230.
24. Aires CP, Tabchoury CPM, Del Bel Cury AA, Cury JA. Effect of a lactose-containing sweetener on root dentine demineralization in situ. Caries Res 2002;36:167-169.
25. Hara AT, Queiroz CS, Paes Leme AF, Serra MC, Cury JA. Caries progression and inhibition in human and bovine root dentine in situ. Caries Res 2003;37:339-344. (Pubitemid 37108897)
26. ten Cate JM, Van Duinen RNB. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995;74:1266-1271.
27. ten Cate JM. In situ models, physico-chemical aspects. Adv Dent Res 1994;8:125-33.
28. Osorio R, Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Tay FR, Toledano M. Resistance often contemporary adhesives to resin-dentine bond degradation. J Dent 2008;36:163-169.
29. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007;28:3757-85. (Pubitemid 47053932)
30. Pashley EL, Tao L, Pashley DH. Sterilization of human teeth: Its effect on permeability and bond strength. Am J Dent 1993;6:189-191.
31. Radovic I, Vulicevic Z Radovic I, Vulicevic ZR, Garcia-Godoy F. Morphological evaluation of 2- and 1 -step self-etching system interfaces with dentin. Oper Dent 2006;31:710-718. (Pubitemid 44886168)
32. Kidd EAM, Ferjerskov O. What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilm. J Dent Res 2004;83 (Spec Is C):C35-C38. (Pubitemid 44126040)
33. Massler M. Pulpal reactions to dental caries. Int Dent J 1967; 17:441-460.
34. Erhardt MC, Amaral CM, de Castro AK, Ambrosano GM, Pimenta LA. In vitro influence of Carisolv on shear bond strength of dentin bonding agents. Quintessence Int 2004;35:801-807. (Pubitemid 39329777)
35. Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Marshall Jr GW, Goto G. Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary and young permanent dentin. J Dent 2001;29:163-171. (Pubitemid 33660555)
36. Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation. Caries Res 2000;28:179-186.
37. Corrêa FN, Rodrigues Filho LE, Rodrigues CR. Evaluation of residual dentin after conventional and chemomechanical caries removal using SEM. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;32:115-120.
38. Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Blomlöf J. Effect of a chemo-mechanical caries removal system (Carisolv) on dentin topography of non-carious dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:185-189. (Pubitemid 29470579)
39. Yazici AR, Özgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. A scanning electron microscopic study of different caries removal techniques on human dentin. Oper Dent 2002;27:360-366. (Pubitemid 43216852)
40. Piva E, Ogliari FA, Moraes RR, Corá F, Henn S, Correr-Sobrinho L. Papain-based gel for biochemical caries removal: Influence on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Braz Oral Res 2008;22:364-370.
41. Çehreli ZC, Yazici AR, Akca T, Ozgünaltay G. A morphological and microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected human dentine after four different caries removal techniques. J Dent 2003;31:429-435. (Pubitemid 36870893)
42. Erhardt MC, Toledano M, Osorio R, Pimenta LA. Histomorphologic characterization and bond strength evaluation of caries-affected dentin/resin interfaces: Effects of long-term water exposure. Dent Mater 2008;24:786-798. (Pubitemid 351626161)
43. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vannerie G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-213.
44. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-458. (Pubitemid 41756839)
45. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Interfacila micromorphology of three adhesive systems created in caries affected-dentin. Am J Dent 2003;16:202-206. (Pubitemid 41310080)
46. Kubo S, Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakege of dentin adhesive systems bonded to Carisolv-treated dentin. Oper Dent 2002;27:387-395. (Pubitemid 43216855)
47. Kaneshiro AV, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Comparison of bonding ability of single-step self-etching adhesives with different etching aggressiveness to root dentin. Dent Mater J 2007;26:773-784.
48. Arisu HD, Eligüzeloǧlu E, Uçtaşli MB, Omürlü H. Effect of multiple consecutive applications of one-step self-etch adhesive on microtensile bond strength. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10.67-74.