Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 179-186

  Banerjee, A ^a   Kidd, E A M ^a   Watson, T F ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dentine caries; Mechanical chemo mechanical excavation; Scanning electron microscopy

Indexed keywords

CARISOLV; GLUTAMIC ACID; LEUCINE; LYSINE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; EVALUATION; GEL; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AIR ABRASION, DENTAL; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTIN; EVALUATION STUDIES; GELS; GLUTAMIC ACID; HUMANS; LEUCINE; LYSINE; MANDIBLE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; SONICATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0034146547     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00064-0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, et al. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine 1997;8:306-35.
2. Nakabayashi N. The hybrid layer: a resin-dentin composite. Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society 1992;88:321-30.
3. Nakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakamura M. Identification of a resin-dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: durable bonding to dentin. Quintessence International 1992;23:135-41.
4. Van Meerbeck B, Dhem A, Goret-Niçaise M, et al. Comparative SEM and TEM examination of the ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. Journal of Dental Research 1993;72:495-501.
5. Elderton RJ. New approaches to cavity design with special reference to the Class II lesion. British Dental Journal 1984;157:421-7.
6. Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. Microbiological evaluation of caries activity during cavity preparation. Caries Research 1993;27:402-8.
7. Frencken JE, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P, et al. An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after one year. International Dental Journal 1994;44:460-4.
8. Bjørndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Research 1997;31:411-7.
9. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW, Ergle JW, et al. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. Journal of the American Dental Association 1998;129:55-66.
10. Weerheijm KL, Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, et al. Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations: 2-year in vivo effects. Caries Research 1999;33:130-4.
11. Boyde A, Jones SJ. Scanning electron microscopy of bone: instrument, specimen and issues. Microscopy Research and Technique 1996;33:92-120.
12. Radford DR, Radford JR. A SEM study of denture plaque and oral mucosa of denture-related stomatitis. Journal of Dentistry 1993;21:87-93.
13. Gwinnett AJ, Barkmeier WW. Morphology of dentin surfaces in chemo-mechanically prepared cavities. American Journal of Dentistry 1988;3:101-4.
14. Bloxham GP, Dennison JD, Charbeneau GT. A clinical scanning electron microscope study of tooth surface preparation and bonding. Australian Dental Journal 1990;35:345-51.
15. Burke FM, Lynch E. Glass polyalkenoate bond strength to dentine after chemomechanical caries removal. Journal of Dentistry 1994;22:283-91.
16. Santini A, Mitchell S. A scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of Gluma CPS bonding system on dentinal smear layers produced by different bur types and rotational speeds and on the resin-dentin interface. Quintessence International 1998;29:737-47.
17. Barnes IE. Replication techniques for the scanning electron microscope. II. Clinical and laboratory procedures: interpretation. Journal of Dentistry 1979;7:25-37.
18. Bevenius J, Hultenby K. In vitro and in vivo replication for scanning electron microscopy of the cervical region of human teeth. Scanning Microscopy 1991;5:731-40.
19. Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Davidson C. An universal and accurate replica technique for scanning electron microscope study in clinical dentistry. Microscopica Acta 1981;85:45-58.
20. Brännström M, Johnson G, Friskopp J. Microscopic observations of the dentin under caries lesions excavated with the GK-101 technique. Journal of Dentistry for Children 1980;47:46-9.
21. Inokoshi S, Harada N, Nakaoki Y, et al. Quality of bonding agents: adhesion mechanism. In: Dall'Orologio GD, Prati C, et al., editors. Factors influencing the quality of composite restorations. Theory and practice, Cavex Holland BV, 1997.
22. Los SA, Barkmeier WW. Effects of dentin air abrasion with aluminium oxide and hydroxyapatite on adhesive bond strength. Operative Dentistry 1994;19:169-75.
23. Black RB. Airbrasive: some fundamentals. Journal of the American Dental Association 1950;41:701-10.
24. Black RB. Application and revaluation of air abrasive technique. Journal of the American Dental Association 1955;50:408-14.
25. Goldstein RE, Parkins FM. Air-abrasive technology: its new role in restorative dentistry. Journal of the American Dental Association 1994;125:51-557.
26. Goldstein RE, Parkins FM. Air-abrasive technology - authors' response. Journal of the American Dental Association 1994;125:1164-6.
27. Laurell KA, Hess JA. Scanning electron micrographic effects of air-abrasion cavity preparation on human enamel and dentin. Quintessence International 1995;26:139-44.