Microtensile bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems to demineralized dentin after the use of a papain-based chemomechanical method

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-28

  Gianini, Renato José ^b   Do Amaral, Flávia Lucisano Botelho ^b   Flório, Flávia Martão ^b   Basting, Roberta Tarkany ^a  

^a SÃO LEOPOLDO MANDIC INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Brazil)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ADHESE CEMENT; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PAPACARIE; PAPAIN; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND;

ARTICLE; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLIC RESINS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PAPAIN; RESIN CEMENTS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION;

EID: 77952527120     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken J, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dent-istry .A review. FDI Commission Project 1-91.Int Dent J 2000,50:11-12.
2. Anusavice KJ. Preservative dentistry: The standard of care for the 21st century. J Public Health Dent 1995;55:67-68.
3. Peters MC, McLean ME. Minimally invasive operative care. Minimal intervention and concepts for minimally invasive cavity preparations J Adhes Dent 2001 ;3:7-16.
4. Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentine: Diagnosis and treatment Oper Dent 1979;4:63-70.
5. Massler M. Changing concepts in the treatment of carious lesions. Br Dent J 1967;123:547-548.
6. Bjørndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res 1997;31:411-417.
7. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW, Ergle JW, Rueggerberg FA, Adair SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: Results at year 10. J AmDentAssoc 1998; 129:55-66.
8. Ten Cate JM, Van Duinen RNB. Hypemineralization of dentinal lesions adja-cent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995;74:1266-1271.
9. Nadanovsky P, Cameiro FC, Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: A comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods. Caries Res 2001;35:384-389.
10. Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. Caries Res 2000;34:144-150.
11. Shovelton S. The maintenance of pulp vitality. Br Dent] 1972;133:95-101.
12. Stanley HR, Swedlow H. Biological effects of various cutting methods in cavity preparation: The part pressure plays in pulpal response. J Am Dent Assoc 1960;61:450-456.
13. Munshi AK, Hedge AM, Shetty PR. Clinical evaluation of Carisolv in the chemico-mechanical removal of carious dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2001;26:49-54.
14. Horowitz AM. Introduction to the symposium on minimal intervention techniques for caries. J Public Health Dent 1996;56 (Sp Is 3):133-134.
15. Kawadia K, Karagianni V, Polychronopolou A, Papagiannouli L. Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: A clinical trial. Pediatr Dent 2004;26:23-28.
16. Lozano-Chourio MA, Zambrano O, Gonzalez H, Quero M. Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv). Int J Paediatr Dent 2006;16:161-167.
17. Magalhaes CS, Moreira AN, Campos WR, Rossi FM, Castilho GA, Ferreira RC. Effectiveness and efficiency of chemomechanical carious dentin removal. Braz Dent J 2006; 17:63-67.
18. Azrak B, Callaway A, Grundheber A, Stender E, Willershausen B. Comparison of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) with that of conventional excavation in reducing the cariogenic flora. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004;14:182-191.
19. Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Mokrys K, Kaup M, Reiner Ott KH. Reaction of sound and demineralised dentine to Carisolv in vivo and in vitro. J Dent 2002;30:59-65.
20. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvao AC. Papain gel: A new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005;30:115-119.
21. Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ. Does chemomechanical caries removal affect dentine adhesion? Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108:449-455.
22. Erhardt MC, Amaral CM, de Castro AK, Ambrosano GM, Pimenta LA. In vitro influence of Carisolv on shear bond strength of dentin bonding agents. Quintessence lnt 2004;35:801-807.
23. Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Marshall Jr GW, Goto G. Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary and young permanent dentine. J Dent 2001:29:163-171.
24. Lopes MC, Mascarini RC, Silva, BMCG, Flório FM, Basting RT. Effect of papain-based gel for chemomechanical caries removal on dentin shear bond strength. J Dent Child 2007;74:93-97.
25. Corrêa FN, Rodrigues Filho LE, Rodrigues CR. Evaluation of residual dentin after conventional and chemomechanical caries removal using SEM. JClin Pediatr Dent 2008;32:l 15-120.
26. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 4th ed. New York: Jonh Wiley and Sons; 1996:704.
27. Hara AT, Magalhaes CS, Rodrigues Jr AL, Sena MC. Cariostatic effect of adhesive restorations in root surfaces: An in vitro study. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2000;14:113-118. (In Portuguese).
28. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Chicchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength. Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test Dent Mater 1994;10:236-240.
29. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, YoshiyamaM, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater 1995; 11:117-125.
30. Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation. Caries Res 2000;28:179-186.
31. Flindt M. Health and safety aspects of working with enzymes. Process Biochem 1979;13:3-7.
32. Bussadori SK, Guedes CC, Hermida Bruno ML, Ram D. Chemo-mechanical removal of caries in an adolescent patient using a papain gel: Case report. JClin Pediatr Dent 2008 32:177-180.
33. Bussadori SK, Martins MD, Femandes KPS, Guedes CC, Motta LJ, Redá SH, Santos EM. Evaluation of the "in vitro" biocompatibility of a new materials for the chemical and mechanical removal of caries - Papácarie. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr 2005:5:253-259. (In Portuguese).
34. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwing E. Chemomechanical caries removal: A comprehensive review of the literature. lnt Dent J 2001:51:291-299.
35. Featherstone JD. Modeling the caries-inhibitory effects of dental materials. Dent Mater 1996; 12:194-197.
36. Hara AT, Queiroz CS, Giannini M, Cury JA, Sena MC. Influence of the mineral content and morphological pattern of artificial root caries lesion on composite resin bond strength. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112:67-72.
37. Erhardt MC, Rodrigues JA, Valentino TA, Ritter AV, Pimenta LA. In vitro μTBS of one-bottle adhesive systems: Sound versus artificially-created caries- affected dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;86:181-187.
38. Cederhmd A, Lindskog S, Blomldf J. Effect of a chemo-mechanical caries removal system (Carisolv) on dentin topography of non-carious dentin. Ada OdontolScand 1999;57:185-189.
39. Yazici AR, Özgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. A scanning electron microscopic study of different caries removal techniques on human dentin. Oper Dent 2002;27:360-366.
40. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-1213
41. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-132.
42. Ceballos L, Camejo DG, Victoria Fuentes M, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch and self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentine. J Dent 2003;31:469-477.
43. Pashley DH. The effects of acid etching on the pulpodentin complex. Oper Dent 1992:17:229-242.
44. Çehreli ZC, Yazici AR, Akca T, Ozgünaltay G. A morphological and micro-tensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries- affected human dentine after four different caries removal techniques. J Dent 2003;31:429-435.
45. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of hard dental tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd, 1998; 57-84.
46. Sattabanasuk V, MF Burrow MF, Y Shimada Y, Tagami J. Resin adhesion to caries-affected dentine after different removal methods. Aust Dent J 2006;51:162-169.