Recent advances in perception and action

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 801-803

  Gegenfurtner, Karl ^a   Henriques, Denise ^b   Krauzlis, Rich ^c  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b York University   (Canada)

^c SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; EYE TRACKING; GAZE; NERVE CELL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79954490266     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (45)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F., Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 1995, 5:679-685.
2. Bedell H.E., Tong J., Aydin M. The perception of motion smear during eye and head movements. Vision Research 2010, 50:2692-2701.
3. Beets I.A., 't Hart B.M., Rösler F., Henriques D.Y., Einhäuser W., Fiehler K. Online action-to-perception transfer: Only percept-dependent action affects perception. Vision Research 2010, 50:2633-2641.
4. Bergman Tiest W.M. Tactual perception of material properties. Vision Research 2010, 50:2775-2782.
5. Blanke M., Harsch L., Knöll J., Bremmer F. Spatial perception during pursuit initiation. Vision Research 2010, 50:2714-2720.
6. Bogadhi A.R., Montagnini A., Mamassian P., Perrinet L.U., Masson G.S. Pursuing motion illusions: A realistic oculomotor framework for Bayesian inference. Vision Research 2011, 51:867-880.
7. Braun D.I., Schütz A.C., Gegenfurtner K.R. Localization of speed differences of context stimuli during fixation and smooth pursuit eye movements. Vision Research 2010, 50:2740-2749.
8. Bruno N., Knox P.C., de Grave D.D. A metanalysis of the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccadic eye movements: No general support for a dissociation of perception and oculomotor action. Vision Research 2010, 50:2671-2682.
9. Byrne P.A., Cappadocia D.C., Crawford J.D. Interactions between gaze-centered and allocentric representations of reach target location in the presence of spatial updating. Vision Research 2010, 50:2661-2670.
10. Cloherty S.L., Mustari M.J., Rosa M.G., Ibbotson M.R. Effects of saccades on visual processing in primate MSTd. Vision Research 2010, 50:2683-2691.
11. Coppe S., de Xivry J.J., Missal M., Lefèvre P. Biological motion influences the visuomotor transformation for smooth pursuit eye movements. Vision Research 2010, 50:2721-2728.
12. Debono K., Schütz A.C., Spering M., Gegenfurtner K.R. Receptive fields for smooth pursuit eye movements and motion perception. Vision Research 2010, 50:2729-2739.
13. Di Luca M. Perceived compliance in a pinch. Vision Research 2011, 51:961-967.
14. Eloka O., Franz V.H. Effects of object shape on the visual guidance of action. Vision Research 2011, 51:925-931.
15. Fiehler K., Schütz I., Henriques D. Gaze-centered spatial updating of reach targets across different memory delays. Vision Research 2011, 51:890-897.
16. Franchak J.M., Adolph K.E. Visually guided navigation: Head-mounted eye-tracking of natural locomotion in children and adults. Vision Research 2010, 50:2766-2774.
17. Franchak J.M., van der Zalm D.J., Adolph K.E. Learning by doing: Action performance facilitates affordance perception. Vision Research 2010, 50:2758-2765.
18. Franz V.H. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5:457-459.
19. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R. Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25:920-950.
20. Gegenfurtner K.R., Bremmer F., Fiehler K., Henriques D., Krauzlis R. Vision research special issue on "perception and action" Vision Research 2010, 50:2617.
21. Goodale M.A., Westwood D.A. An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2004, 14:203-211.
22. Goodale, M. A. (in press). Transforming vision into action. Vision Research.
23. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 1992, 15:20-25.
24. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D., Jakobson L.S., Carey D.P. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 1991, 349:154-156.
25. Hesse C., Franz V.H. Grasping remembered objects: Exponential decay of the visual memory. Vision Research 2010, 50:2642-2650.
26. Jovanovic B., Schwarzer G. Learning to grasp efficiently: The development of motor planning and the role of observational learning. Vision Research 2011, 51:945-954.
27. Klatzky R.L., Lederman S.J. The haptic glance: A route to rapid object identification and manipulation. Attention and performance 1999, Vol. XVII:165-196. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. Klatzky R.L., Wu B., Stetten G. The disembodied eye: Consequences of displacing perception from action. Vision Research 2010, 50:2618-2626.
29. Klingenhoefer S., Bremmer F. Saccadic suppression of displacement in face of saccade adaptation. Vision Research 2011, 51:881-889.
30. Libertus K., Needham A. Teach to reach: The effects of active vs. passive reaching experiences on action and perception. Vision Research 2010, 50:2750-2757.
31. Lindemann O., Nuku P., Rueschemeyer S.A., Bekkering H. Grasping the other's attention: The role of animacy in action cueing of joint attention. Vision Research 2011, 51:940-944.
32. Mahaffy S., Krauzlis R. Neural activity in the frontal pursuit area does not underlie pursuit target selection. Vision Research 2011, 51:853-866.
33. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:774-785.
34. Paulus M., Hunnius S., Bekkering H. Infants use grasp information to predict the goal of a novel tool-use action. Vision Research 2011, 51:955-960.
35. Blangero A., Khan A.Z., Rode G., Rossetti Y., Pisella L. Dissociation between intentional and automatic remapping: Different levels of interhemispheric transfer. Vision Research 2011, 51:932-939.
36. Schenk T. Visuomotor robustness is based on integration not segregation. Vision Research 2010, 50:2627-2632.
37. Schenk T., Franz V.H., Bruno N. Is Milner and Goodale's perception-action theory the best account of neuropsychological and psychophysical data? An integrative view of the visual cortex might be the better alternative. Vision Research 2011, 51:812-818.
38. Schütz A.C., Morrone M.C. Compression of time during smooth pursuit eye movements. Vision Research 2010, 50:2702-2713.
39. Selen L., Medendorp P. Saccadic updating of object orientation for grasping movements. Vision Research 2011, 51:898-907.
40. Spering M., Montagnini A. Do we track what we see? Common versus independent processing for motion perception and smooth pursuit eye movements: A review. Vision Research 2011, 51:836-852.
41. Thompson A.A., Henriques D. The coding and updating of visuospatial memory for goal-directed reaching and pointing. Vision Research 2011, 51:819-826.
42. Thompson A.A., Henriques D.Y. Locations of serial reach targets are coded in multiple reference frames. Vision Research 2010, 50:2651-2660.
43. Westwood D., Goodale M. Converging evidence for diverging pathways: Neuropsychology and psychophysics tell the same story. Vision Research 2011, 51:804-811.
44. Whitwell R.L., Striemer C.L., Nicolle D.A., Goodale M.A. Grasping the non-conscious: Preserved grip scaling for unseen objects following unilateral lesions to primary visual cortex for immediate but not delayed grasping. Vision Research 2011, 51:908-924.
45. Zentgraf K., Munzert J., Bischoff M., Newman-Norlund R. The neuroscience of action observation - Foundations and applications. Vision Research 2011, 51:827-835.