Pursuing motion illusions: A realistic oculomotor framework for Bayesian inference

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 867-880

  Bogadhi, Amarender R ^a   Montagnini, Anna ^a   Mamassian, Pascal ^b   Perrinet, Laurent U ^a   Masson, Guillaume S ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Aperture problem; Bayesian model; Motion perception; Smooth pursuit eye movements; Temporal dynamics; Tracking error

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MOTION ILLUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOOTH PURSUIT EYE MOVEMENT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

BAYES THEOREM; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; NEURONS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PURSUIT, SMOOTH;

EID: 79954477453     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.021     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Albrecht D.G., Geisler W.S., Frazor R.A., Crane A.M. Visual cortex neurons of monkeys and cats: Temporal dynamics of the contrast response function. Journal of Neurophysiology 2002, 88:888-913.
2. Barthélemy F.V., Perrinet L.U., Castet E., Masson G.S. Dynamics of distributed 1D and 2D motion representations for short-latency ocular following. Vision Research 2008, 48:501-522.
3. Born R.T., Pack C.C., Ponce C.R., Yi S. Temporal evolution of 2-dimensional direction signals used to guide eye movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 95:284-300.
4. Bradley D.C., Goyal M.S. Velocity computation in the primate visual system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:686-695.
5. Busettini C., Miles F.A., Schwarz U. Ocular responses to translation and their dependence on viewing distance. II. Motion of the scene. Journal of Neurophysiology 1991, 66:865-878.
6. Castet E., Lorenceau J., Shiffrar M., Bonnet C. Perceived speed of moving lines depends on orientation, length, speed and luminance. Vision Research 1993, 33:1921-1936.
7. Collewijn H., van der Mark F., Jansen T.C. Precise recordings of human eye movements. Vision Research 1975, 15:447-450.
8. DeAngelis G.C., Uka T. Coding of horizontal disparity and velocity by MT neurons in the alert macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89:1094-1111.
9. DeSperati C., Viviani P. The relationship between curvature and velocity in two-dimensional smooth pursuit eye movements. Journal of Neuroscience 1997, 17(10):3932-3945.
10. Dimova K.D., Denham M.J. A neurally plausible model of the dynamics of motion integration in smooth eye pursuit based on recursive Bayesian estimation. Biological Cybernetics 2009, 100:185-201.
11. Dimova K.D., Denham M.J. A model of plaid motion perception based on recursive Bayesian integration of the 1-D and 2-D motions of plaid features. Vision Research 2010, 50:585-597.
12. Freeman T.C., Champion R.A., Warren P.A. A Bayesian model of perceived head-centered velocity during smooth pursuit eye movement. Current Biology 2010, 20:757-762.
13. Goldreich D., Krauzlis R.J., Lisberger S.G. Effect of changing feed back delay on spontaneous oscillations in smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology 1992, 67:625-638.
14. Heinen S.J., Watamaniuk S.N.J. Spatial integration in human smoothpursuit. Vision Research 1998, 38:3785-3794.
15. Hurlimann F., Kiper D.C., Carandini M. Testing the Bayesian model of perceived speed. Vision Research 2002, 42:2253-2257.
16. Kersten D., Mamassian P., Yuille A. Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:10.1-10.32.
17. Krauzlis R.J., Miles F.A. Initiation of saccades during fixation and pursuit: Evidence in humans for a single mechanisms. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 76:4175-4179.
18. Lisberger S.G. Visual guidance of smooth-pursuit eye movements: Sensation, action, and what happens in between. Neuron 2010, 66:477-491.
19. Lorenceau J., Shiffrar M. The influence of terminators on motion integration across space. Vision Research 1992, 32:263-273.
20. Lorenceau J., Shiffrar M., Wells N., Castet E. Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines. Vision Research 1993, 33:1207-1217.
21. Masson G.S., Castet E. Parallel motion processing for the initiation of short-latency ocular following in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 22:5149-5163.
22. Masson G.S., Ilg U.J. Dynamics of visual motion processing: Neuronal, behavioral, and computational approaches 2010, Springer Verlag, New-York.
23. Masson G.S., Rybarzcyk Y., Castet E., Mestre D.R. Temporal dynamics of motion integration for the initiation of tracking eye movements at ultra-short latencies. Visual Neuroscience 2000, 17:753-767.
24. Masson G.S., Stone L.S. From following edges to pursuing objects. Journal of Neurophysiology 2002, 88:2869-2873.
25. Miles F.A., Fuller J.H. Visual tracking and the primate flocculus. Science 1975, 189:1000-1003.
26. Montagnini A., Mamassian P., Perrinet L.U., Castet E., Masson G.S. Bayesian modeling of dynamic motion integration. Journal of Physiology (Paris) 2007, 101:64-77.
27. Montagnini A., Spering M., Masson G.S. Predicting 2D target velocity cannot help 2D motion integration for smooth pursuit initiation. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:3545-3550.
28. Movshon J.A., Adelson E.H., Gizzi M.S., Newsome W.T. The analysis of moving visual patterns. Experimental Brain Research 1986, 11:117-152.
29. Osborne L.C., Bialek W., Lisberger S.G. Time course of information about motion direction in visual area MT of macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 31:3210-3222.
30. Osborne L.C., Hold S.S., Bialek W., Lisberger S.G. Time course of precision in smooth - pursuit eye movements of monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(11):2987-2998.
31. Osborne L.C., Lisberger S.G., Bialek W. A sensory source for motor variation. Nature 2005, 437:412-416.
32. Pack C.C., Born R.T. Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain. Nature 2001, 409:1040-1042.
33. Pack C.C., Gartland A.J., Born R.T. Integration of contour and terminator signals in visual area MT of alert macaque. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(13):3268-3280.
34. Pack C.C., Hunter J.N., Born R.T. Contrast dependence of suppressive influences in cortical area MT of alert macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 93(3):1809-1815.
35. Rust N.C., Mante V., Simoncelli E.P., Movshon J.A. How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9(11):1421-1431.
36. Simoncelli, E. P., Adelson, E. H., Heeger, D. J. (1991). Probability distribution of optical flow. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer and vision pattern recognition (pp. 310-315).
37. Smith M.A., Majaj N.J., Movshon A.J. Dynamics of motion signalling by neurons in macaque area MT. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:220-228.
38. Soechting J.F., Mrotek L.A., Flanders M. Smooth pursuit tracking of an abrupt change in target direction: Vector superposition of discrete responses. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 160:245-258.
39. Spering M., Kerzel D., Braun D.I., Hawken M.J., Gegenfurtner K.R. Effects of contrast on smooth pursuit eye movements. Journal of Vision 2005, 5:455-465.
40. Stocker A.A., Simoncelli E.P. Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9:578-585.
41. Tanaka M., Lisberger S.G. Regulation of the gain of visually guided smooth-pursuit eye movements by frontal cortex. Nature 2001, 409:191-194.
42. Tlapale E., Masson G.S., Kornprobst P. Modeling the dynamics of motion integration with a new luminance-gated diffusion mechanism. Vision Research 2010, 50:1676-1692.
43. Tsui J.M.G., Hunter N., Born R.T., Pack C.C. The role of V1 surround suppression in MT motion integration. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103(6):3123-3128.
44. Wallace J.M., Stone L.S., Masson G.S. Object motion computation for the initiation of smooth pursuit eye movements in humans. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 93:2279-2293.
45. Wallach H. Visual truth movement directions. Psychologie Forshung 1935, 20:325-380.
46. Weiss, Y., & Adelson, E. (1998). Slow and smooth: a Bayesian theory for the combination of local motion signals in human vision. MIT technical report, A.I. Memo 1624.
47. Weiss Y., Simoncelli E.P., Adelson E.H. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:598-604.