A typology of undergraduate students' conceptions of size and scale: Identifying and characterizing conceptual variation

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 512-533

  Swarat, Su ^a   Light, Greg ^a   Park, Eun Jung ^a   Drane, Denise ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

conceptual understanding; size and scale; variation theory

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING; DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS; ENGINEERING COURSE; INSTRUCTIONAL INTERVENTIONS; KNOWLEDGE GAPS; SIZE AND SCALE; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS; VARIATION THEORIES; VARIATION THEORY;

NANOSCIENCE; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 79953906252     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20403     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Akerlind, G. S., (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 24 (4), 321-334. (Pubitemid 43084446)
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bowden, J., &, Marton, F., (1998). The university of learning. London: Kogan Page.
4. Castellini, O. M., Walejko, G. K., Holladay, C. E., Thiem, T. J., Zenner, G. M., &, Crone, W. C., (2007). Nanotechnology and the public: Effectively communicating nanoscale science and engineering concepts. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9 (2), 183-189. (Pubitemid 46399245)
5. Confrey, J., (1991). Learning to listen: A student's understanding of powers of ten. In, E. von Glasersfeld, (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education. (pp. 111-138). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6. Delgado, C., (2009) Development of a research-based learning progression for middle school through undergraduate students' conceptual understanding of size and scale. Unpublished Dissertation. University of Michigan.
7. Delgado, C., (2010) Knowledge of scale construction for graphing in undergraduate students. National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
8. Delgado, C., Stevens, S. Y., Shin, N., Yunker, M. L., &, Krajcik, J. S., (2007). The development of students' conceptions of size. National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
9. Eames Office. (2009). Powers of Ten. Retrieved from (accessed on November 22, 2009).
10. Jones, M. G., &, Taylor, A. R., (2009). Developing a sense of scale: Looking backward. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (4), 460-475.
11. Jones, M. G., Taylor, A. R., &, Broadwell, B., (2009). Concepts of scale held by students with visual impairment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (5), 506-519.
12. Jones, M. G., Taylor, A., Minogue, J., Broadwell, B., Wiebe, E., &, Carter, G., (2007). Understanding scale: Powers of ten. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16 (2), 191-202.
13. Jones, M. G., Tretter, T., Taylor, A., &, Oppewal, T., (2008). Experienced and novice teachers' concepts of spatial scale. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (3), 409-429.
14. Light, G., Swarat, S., Park, E.-J., Drane, D., Tevaarwerk, E., &, Mason, T., (2007) Understanding undergraduate students' conceptions of a core nanoscience concept: Size and scale. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, Honolulu, Hawaii.
15. Micari, M., Light, G., Calkins, S., &, Streitwieser, B., (2007). Assessment beyond performance: Phenomenography in educational evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 28 (4), 458-476.
16. Marton, F., &, Booth, S., (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Marton, F., &, Pang, M., (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15 (2), 193-220. (Pubitemid 43602585)
18. Marton, F., &, Tsui, A., (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Pang, M., &, Marton, F., (2005). Learning theory as Teaching Resource: Enhancing students understanding of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 33, 159-191. (Pubitemid 40550274)
20. Park, E.-J., Swarat, S., Light, G., &, Drane, D., (2009). The impact of a teaching intervention for size and scale based on conceptual variations. Proceedings of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Garden Grove, CA.
21. Park, E.-J., Swarat, S., Light, G., &, Drane, D., (2010). Student understanding of scale: From additive to multiplicative reasoning in the construction of scale representation by ordering objects in a number line. National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
22. Patton, M. Q., (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
23. Smith, E., &, Confrey, J., (1994). Multiplicative structures and the development of logarithms: What was lost by the invention of functions? In:, G. Harel, &, J. Confrey, (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 331-360). Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
24. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., &, Roschelle, J., (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 115-163.
25. Stevens, S., Shin, N., Delgado, C., Cahill, C., Yunker, M., &, Krajcik, J., (2007). Fostering students' understanding of interdisciplinary science in a summer science camp. National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
26. Stevens, S., Sutherland, L., &, Krajcik, J., (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering: A guide book for secondary teachers. National Science Teachers Association Press, Arlington, VA.
27. Taylor, A. R., (2008). Students' and teachers' conceptions of surface area to volume in science contexts: What factors influence the understanding of the concept of scale? Unpublished Dissertation, North Carolina State University.
28. Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., &, Minogue, J., (2006). Conceptual boundaries and distances: Students' and experts' concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43 (3), 282-319.
29. Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., &, Minogue, J., (2006). Accuracy of scale conceptions in science: Mental maneuverings across many orders of spatial magnitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43 (10), 1061-1085. (Pubitemid 44935690)
30. Vosniadou, S., &, Verschaffel, L., (2004). Extending the conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 14, 445-451. (Pubitemid 40256624)
31. Waldron, A. M., Spencer, D., &, Batt, C. A., (2006). The current state of public understanding of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8, 569-575. (Pubitemid 44744642)
32. Wansom, S., Mason, T., Hersam, M., Drane, D., Light, G., Cormia, R., Stevens, S., &, Bodner, G., (2009). A rubric for post-secondary degree programs in nanoscience and nanotechnology. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25 (3), 615-627.