Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in Chinese subjects with primary angle-closure and primary open-angle glaucoma

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 129, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 429-434

  Narayanaswamy, Arun ^a   Su, Daniel H ^a   Baskaran, Mani ^a   Tan, Anna C S ^a   Nongpiur, Monisha E ^a   Htoon, Hla M ^a   Wong, Tien Y ^a,b,c   Aung, Tin ^a,b  

^a SINGAPORE EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PARAMETER; PRIMARY ANGLE CLOSURE GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TONOMETRY;

AGED; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BIOMECHANICS; CHINA; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, ANGLE-CLOSURE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 79953901984     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 15383601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.60     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000; 44(5):367-408. (Pubitemid 30151145)
2. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38(1):1-30. (Pubitemid 23234285)
3. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115(5):592-596. (Pubitemid 23137642)
4. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31(1):146-155. (Pubitemid 40260702)
5. Hager A, Schroeder B, Sadeghi M, Grossherr M, Wiegand W. The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure [in German]. Ophthalmologe. 2007;104(6):484-489.
6. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(5):364-370. (Pubitemid 44434988)
7. Munger R, Hodge WG, Mintsioulis G, Agapitos PJ, Jackson WB, Damji KF. Correction of intraocular pressure for changes in central corneal thickness following photorefractive keratectomy. Can J Ophthalmol. 1998;33(3):159-165. (Pubitemid 28280291)
8. Gunvant P, O'Leary DJ, Baskaran M, Broadway DC, Watkins RJ, Vijaya L. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(5):337-343. (Pubitemid 41383325)
9. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52(suppl 2):S109-S114. (Pubitemid 350060960)
10. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156-162. (Pubitemid 40260703)
11. Sullivan-Mee M, Billingsley SC, Patel AD, Halverson KD, Alldredge BR, Qualls C. Ocular response analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(6):463-470.
12. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez- Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(10):4410-4414. (Pubitemid 46579366)
13. Bochmann F, Ang GS, Azuara-Blanco A. Lower corneal hysteresis in glaucoma patients with acquired pit of the optic nerve (APON). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(5):735-738.
14. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2008;36(6):508-513.
15. Ang LP, Aung T, Chua WH, Yip LW, Chew PT. Visual field loss from primary angleclosure glaucoma: a comparative study of symptomatic and asymptomatic disease. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1636-1640. (Pubitemid 39179674)
16. Gazzard G, Foster PJ, Devereux JG, et al. Intraocular pressure and visual field loss in primary angle closure and primary open angle glaucomas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(6):720-725. (Pubitemid 36649224)
17. Lavanya R, Jeganathan VS, Zheng YF, et al. Methodology of the Singapore Indian Chinese Cohort (SICC) eye study: quantifying ethnic variations in the epidemiology of eye diseases in Asians. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009;16(6):325-336.
18. Shen SY, Wong TY, Foster PJ, et al. The prevalence and types of glaucoma in Malay people: the Singapore Malay eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(9):3846-3851.
19. Su DH, Wong TY, Foster PJ, Tay WT, Saw SM, Aung T. Central corneal thickness and its associations with ocular and systemic factors: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(4):709-716, e1.
20. KamiyaK, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Effect of agingoncorneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(10):888-893.
21. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(12):5337-5347. (Pubitemid 46729154)
22. Sun L, Shen M, Wang J, et al. Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma.AmJ Ophthalmol. 2009;147(6):1061-1066.
23. Ang GS, Bochmann F, Townend J, Azuara-Blanco A. Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(4):259-262.
24. Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R, Chui WS. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(9):909-914. (Pubitemid 47415167)
25. Gazzard G, Foster PJ, Viswanathan AC, et al. The severity and spatial distribution of visual field defects in primary glaucoma: a comparison of primary openangle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120(12):1636-1643. (Pubitemid 36401797)
26. Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, Wong T, Chan KC, Sachdev N. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(8):3262-3268.
27. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(5):868-875.
28. Weinreb RN, Toris CB, Gabelt BT, Lindsey JD, Kaufman PL. Effects of prostaglandins on the aqueous humor outflow pathways. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002; 47(suppl 1):S53-S64. (Pubitemid 35232219)