The severity and spatial distribution of visual field defects in primary glaucoma: A comparison of primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 120, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 1636-1643

  Gazzard, Gus ^a,b,c,d   Foster, Paul J ^a,b,c,d   Viswanathan, Ananth C ^c,d   Devereux, Joe G ^a,c   Oen, Francis T S ^a   Chew, Paul T K ^a   Khaw, Peng T ^c,d   Seah, Steve K L ^a  

^a SINGAPORE NATIONAL EYE CENTRE   (Singapore)

^b SINGAPORE EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A SCAN; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLOSED ANGLE GLAUCOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; GONIOSCOPY; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PRIMARY GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TONOMETRY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

EID: 0036969941     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.120.12.1636     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Duke-Elder S. Primary closed-angle glaucoma. In: Duke-Elder S, ed. Diseases of the Lens and Vitreous: Glaucoma and Hypotony. London, England: Henry Kimpton; 1969:563-624.
2. McNaught EI, Rennie A, McClure E, Chisholm IA. Pattern of visual damage after acute angle-closure glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1974;94:406-415.
3. Horie T, Kitazawa Y, Nosé H. Visual field changes in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1975;19:108-115.
4. Dhillon B, Chew PT, Lim ASM. Field loss in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 1990;2:85-87.
5. Douglas GR, Drance SM, Schulzer M. The visual field and nerve head in angleclosure glaucoma: a comparison of the effects of acute and chronic angle closure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93:409-411.
6. Bonomi L, Marrafa M, Marchini G, Canali M. Perimetric defects after a single acute angle-closure glaucoma attack. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237: 908-914.
7. Jonas JB, Fernandez MC, Sturmer J. Pattern of glaucomatous neuroretinal rim loss. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:63-68.
8. Drance SM. The glaucomatous visual field. Invest Ophthalmol. 1972;11:85-96.
9. Hart WM, Becker B. The onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:268-279.
10. Caprioli J, Sears M, Miller JM. Patterns of early visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;103:512-517.
11. Chauhan BC, Drance SM. The relationship between intraocular pressure and visual field progression in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1992; 230:521-526.
12. Ritch R, Lowe RF. Angle closure glaucoma: mechanisms and epidemiology. In: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T, eds. The Glaucomas. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1996: 801-819.
13. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:238-242.
14. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer D, et al. Lens Opacity Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:831-836.
15. Asman P, Heijl A. Glaucoma Hemifield Test: automated visual field evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:812-819.
16. Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in Mongolia: a population-based survey in Hövsgöl Province, Northern Mongolia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1235-1241.
17. Foster PJ, Oen FT, Machin DS, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey in Tanjong Pagar district. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1105-1111.
18. Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1710-1716.
19. Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, et al. Open-angle glaucoma in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1702-1709.
20. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80:389-393.
21. Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Zangwill L, Lee AC, Kono Y, Weinreb RN. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:309-313.
22. Demirel S, Johnson CA. Isolation of short-wavelength sensitive mechanisms in normal and glaucomatous visual field regions. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:63-73.
23. Wild JM. Short wavelength automated perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001; 79:546-559.
24. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111:645-650.
25. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 129:314-322.
26. Iester M, Mermoud A, Schnyder C. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:288-294.
27. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998; 125:819-829.
28. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
29. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:368-375.
30. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999;77:143-146.
31. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998; 76:268-272.
32. Wild JM, Pacey IE, O'Neill EC, Cunliffe IA. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1998-2009.
33. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects: Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:165-169.
34. Chauhan BC, Drance SM. The influence of intraocular pressure on visual field damage in patients with normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:2367-2372.
35. Drance SM, Douglas GR, Airaksinen PJ, Schulzer M, Hitchings RA. Diffuse visual field loss in chronic open-angle and low-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;104:577-580.
36. Hitchings RA, Anderton SA. A comparative study of visual field defects seen in patients with low-tension glaucoma and chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983;67:818-821.
37. Caprioli J, Spaeth GL. Comparison of visual field defects in the low-tension glaucomas with those in the high-tension glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;97: 730-737.
38. Araie M, Yamagami J, Suziki Y. Visual field defects in normal-tension and hightension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1808-1814.
39. Aung T, Foster PJ, Seah S, et al. Automated static perimetry: the influence of myopia and its method of correction. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:290-295.
40. Shapiro A, Zauberman H. Diurnal changes of the intraocular pressure of patients with angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979;63:225-227.
41. Konstas AG, Mantziris DA, Stewart WC. Diurnal intraocular pressure in untreated exfoliation and primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115:182-185.
42. Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J, Gieser D, Vitale S, Lindenmuth K. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:134-142.