Distal femoral stem-bone anchorage of a cementless revision total hip arthroplasty: Evaluation of 14 patients by CT

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 298-302

  Weiss, Rüdiger J ^a   Strömwall, Fredrik ^a   Beckman, Mats O ^a   Hansson, Karl A ^a   Stark, André ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 74249093218     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453670903039403     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bellomo F, Bertignone L, Morino L, Milano P, Schiavone E, Barale M. MP-Link cementless distal fixation modular prosthesis for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthopaed Traumatol 2002; 2: 121-4.
2. Berry D J. Treatment of Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femur fractures with a fluted tapered stem. Clin Orthop 2003; (417): 224-31. (Pubitemid 37499529)
3. Bircher H P, Riede U, Luem M, Ochsner P E. The value of the Wagner SL revision prosthesis for bridging large femoral defects. Orthopade 2001; 30: 294-303. (Pubitemid 32487983)
4. Bohm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001; 83: 1023-31. (Pubitemid 32662104)
5. D'Aubigne R M, Postel M. Function al results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1954; 36: 451-75.
6. Engh C A, Bobyn J D, Glassman A H. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69: 45-55. (Pubitemid 17098507)
7. Grunig R, Morscher E, Ochsner P E. Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116: 187-97. (Pubitemid 27168311)
8. Harris W H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1969; 51: 737-55.
9. Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R. The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 2000; 24: 139-42. (Pubitemid 30601511)
10. Jedenmalm A, Noz M E, Olivecrona H, Olivecrona L, Stark A. A new approach for assessment of wear in metal-backed acetabular cups using computed tomography: a phantom study with retrievals. Acta Orthop 2008; 79: 218-24. (Pubitemid 351878352)
11. Jones R E. Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2004; (420): 142-7. (Pubitemid 38436570)
12. Krishnamurthy A B, MacDonald S J, Paprosky W G. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 839-47. (Pubitemid 28037651)
13. Kwong L M, Miller A J, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 94-7. (Pubitemid 36542570)
14. Link. MPTM reconstruction prosthesis, cementless. Surgical technique. Waldemar Link GmbH & Co KG, Hamburg/Germany, 2005.
15. Olivecrona H, Olivecrona L, Weidenhielm L, Noz M E, Kardos J, Maguire G Q Jr., Zeleznik M P, Aspelin P. A new technique for diagnosis of acetabular cup loosening using computed tomography: preliminary experience in 10 patients. Acta Orthop 2008; 79: 346-53. (Pubitemid 352009330)
16. Paprosky W G, Greidanus N V, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999; (369): 230-42.
17. Postak P D, Greenwald A S. The influence of modularity on the endurance performance of the Link MPTM hip stem. Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Cleveland Clinic Health System, Cleveland, Ohio, 2001.
18. Roder C, Staub L P, Eichler P, Widmer M, Dietrich D, Eggli S, Muller U. Avoiding misclassification bias with the traditional Charnley classification: rationale for a fourth Charnley class BB. J Orthop Res 2006; 24: 1803-8. (Pubitemid 44430414)
19. Salemyr M F, Skoldenberg O G, Boden H G, Ahl T E, Adolphson P Y. Good results with an uncemented proximally HA-coated stem in hip revision surgery: 62 hips followed for 2-13 years. Acta Orthop 2008; 79: 184-93. (Pubitemid 351878348)
20. Sporer S M, Paprosky W G. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop 2004; (429): 227-31. (Pubitemid 39579217)