Medium-term follow-up series using a modular distal fixation prosthesis to address proximal femoral bone deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. A 5- to 9-year follow-up study

HIP International

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 143-149

  Tamvakopoulos, George S ^a   Servant, C T J ^a   Clark, G ^a   Ivory, J P ^a  

^a GREAT WESTERN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Modular stem; Osteolysis; Periprosthetic fracture; Proximal femoral bone loss; Revision hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; BONE METASTASIS; CERCLAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HUMAN; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEPSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 36549017628     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2008.562     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 429: 227-31.
2. Mallory TH. Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 235: 47-60.
3. Tsiridis E, Haddad FS, Gie GA. The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements. Injury 2003; 34: 95-105.
4. Charnley J. Proceedings: The histology of loosening between acrylic cement and bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1975; 57: 245.
5. MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Magnus RG. Peroprosthetic femoral fractures treated with long-stem cementless component. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 379-83.
6. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 14-21.
7. Wagner H. Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss. Orthopade 1987; 16: 295-300.
8. Sexton SA, Stossel CA, Haddad FS. The Kent hip prosthesis: an evaluation of 145 prostheses after a mean of 5.1 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 310-4.
9. Kwong LM, Miller AJ, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 94-7.
10. Engelbrecht E, Heinert K. Klassifikation und Behndlungsrichtlinien von Knochensubstanzverlusten bei Revisionsoperationen am Huftgelenk-mittelfristige Ergebnisse. Primare und Revisionsalloarthroplastik Hrsg-Endo-Klinik, Hamburg. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1987; 189-201.
11. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 134-7.
12. Mahomed NN, Arndt DC, McGrory BJ, Harris WH. The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-reported with surgeon assessment. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 575-80.
13. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 185-90.
14. Jones RE. Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 420: 142-7.
15. Murphy S, Rodriguez J. Revision total hip athroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 115-9.
16. Warren PJ, Thompson P, Fletcher MD. Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002; 122: 557-60.
17. Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, et al. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 2000; 24: 134-8.
18. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 839-47.
19. Chandler H, Clark J, Murphy S, McCarthy J, Penenberg B, Danylchuk K, Roehr B. Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (298): 67-74.
20. Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R. The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 2000; 24: 139-42.