Measuring the learning capacity of organisations: Development and factor analysis of the questionnaire for learning organizations

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 307-313

  Oudejans, S C C ^a,b   Schippers, G M ^a,b,c   Schramade, M H ^b   Koeter, M W J ^a   Van Den Brink, W ^a  

^a AMSTERDAM INSTITUTE FOR ADDICTION RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b Arkin   (Netherlands)

^c Brijder Verslavingszorg   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LEARNING THEORY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL MODEL; PERSONAL MASTERY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; QUESTIONNAIRE FOR LEARNING ORGANIZATION; SHARED VISION; SYSTEMS THINKING; TEAM LEARNING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; LEARNING; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS;

EID: 79953797526     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.042556     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Jeong SH, Lee T, Kim IS, et al. The effect of nurses' use of the principles of learning organization on organizational effectiveness. J Adv Nurs 2007;58:53-62.
2. Kelly DR, Lough M, Rushmer R, et al. Delivering feedback on learning organization characteristics - using a learning practice inventory. J Eval Clin Pract 2007;13:734-40. (Pubitemid 47373600)
3. Rushmer RK, Kelly D, Lough M, et al. The learning practice inventory: diagnosing and developing learning practices in the UK. J Eval Clin Pract 2007;13:206-11. (Pubitemid 46449795)
4. Senge PM. De vijfde discipline. De kunst en praktijk van de lerende organisatie [The Fifth Discipline. the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization]. Schiedam (The Netherlands): Scriptum Management, 1992:399.
5. Pang NSK. The learning capacity of primary schools in Hong Kong. In: Lee J, Lo L, Walker A, eds. Partnership and Change: Towards School Development. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research and the Chinese University Press, 2004:269-94.
6. Stinson L, Pearson D, Lucas B. Developing a learning culture: twelve tips for individuals, teams and organizations. Med Teach 2006;28:309-12.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ 1997;314:572. (Pubitemid 27089377)
8. West SG, Finch JF, Curran PJ. Structural equation models with non-normal variables: problems and remedies. In: Hoyle RH, ed. Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1995:56-75.
9. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1998.
10. Schumacker R, Lomax RG. A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1996.
11. Moilanen R. Diagnostic tools for learning organizations. Learn Organ 2001;8:6-20.
12. Yang B, Watkins KE, Marsick VJ. The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Hum Resour Dev Q 2004;15:31-55.
13. Song JH, Joo B, Chermack TJ. The Dimensions of Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ): a validation study in a Korean context. Hum Resour Dev Q 2009;20:43-64.
14. Ouwens M, Hulscher M, Akkermans R, et al. The team climate inventory: application in hosptital teams and methodological considerations. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:275-80.
15. Anderson NR, West MA. The team climate inventory: development of the TCI and its applications in teambuilding for innovativeness. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 1996;5:53-66.
16. Anderson NR, West MA. Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Organ Behav 1998;19:235-58.
17. Mathisen GE, Einarsen S, Jørstad K, et al. Climate for work group creativity and innovation: Norwegian validation of the team climate inventory (TCI). Scand J Psychol 2004;45:383-92. (Pubitemid 39508427)
18. Mathisen GE, Einarsen S. A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creat Res J 2004;16:119-40. (Pubitemid 38483952)
19. Proudfoot J, ayasinghe UW, Holton C, et al. Team climate for innovation: What difference does it make in general practice? Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:164-9. (Pubitemid 47090640)
20. Hoyle RH, ed. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.
21. Ducharme LJ, Knudsen HK, Roman PM. Computer systems in addiction treatment programs: availability and implications for program evaluation. Eval Program Plann 2005;28:368-78. (Pubitemid 41722593)
22. Schippers GM, Schramade M, Walburg JA. Reforming Dutch substance abuse treatment services. Addict Behav 2002;27:995-1007. (Pubitemid 36158760)