The role of community feedback in the student example authoring process: An evaluation of AnnotEx

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 482-499

  Hsiao, I Han ^a   Brusilovsky, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHORING PROCESS; EDUCATIONAL CONTENTS; NEW APPROACHES; REVIEWING PROCESS; STUDENT LEARNING;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; STUDENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 79953781235     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01030.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abad, C. L., (2008). Learning through creating learning objects: experiences with a class project in a distributed systems course. In Proceedings of 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE'2008. Madrid, Spain (pp. 255-259). ACM New York, NY, USA.
2. Aleven, V., &, Koedinger, K. R., (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 2, 147-179.
3. Brna, P., (1998). Searcing for examples with a programming techniques editor. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 6, 1, 13-26.
4. Brusilovsky, P., (2001). WebEx: learning from examples in a programming course. In, W. Fowler, &, J. Hasebrook, (Eds), Proceedings of WebNet'2001, World Conference of the WWW and Internet (pp. 124-129). Orlando, FL: AACE.
5. Brusilovsky, P., Grant, N., Hsiao, S., Moore, K., &, Sosnovsky, S., (2007). Personalized E-Learning for distance courses in community colleges. In, T. Bastiaens, &, S. Carliner, (Eds), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning, E-Learn 2007 (pp. 226-231). Quebec City: AACE.
6. Brusilovsky, P., &, Yudelson, M., (2008). From WebEx to NavEx: interactive access to annotated program examples. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96, 6, 990-999.
7. Burow, R., &, Weber, G., (1996). Example explanation in learning environments. In, C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, &, A. Lesgold, (Eds), Proceedings of Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS-96 (pp. 457-465). Berlin: Springer-Verlag London, UK. (Pubitemid 126086785)
8. Cafolla, R., (2006). Project MERLOT: bringing peer review to web-based educational resources. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 2, 313-323.
9. Chi M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., &, Glaser, R., (1989). Self-explanations: how students study and use examples to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
10. Cho, K., &, Schunn, C. D., (2006). Commenting on writing: typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23, 3, 260-294. (Pubitemid 43871560)
11. Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., &, Wilson, R. W., (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 4, 891-901. (Pubitemid 44747846)
12. Davidovic, A., Warren, J., &, Trichina, E., (2003). Learning benefits of structural example-based adaptive tutoring systems. IEEE Transactions on Education, 46, 2, 241-251.
13. Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A., &, Hamer, J., (2008). Student use of the peerwise system. In Proceedings of 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE'2008. Madrid, Spain (pp. 73-77).ACM New York, NY, USA.
14. Fujihara, Y., Ohnishi, H., &, Kato, H., (2006). A practice of peer evaluation in ICT education using a report evaluating support system. In, T. C. Reeves, &, S. F. Yamashita, (Eds), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning, E-Learn 2006 (pp. 687-694). Honolulu, HI: AACE.
15. Gómez Albarrán, M., (2005). Teaching and learning of programming: a survey of supporting software tools. The Computer Journal, 48, 2, 130-144. (Pubitemid 40414920)
16. Gotel, O., Scharff, C., &, Wildenberg, A., (2008). Teaching software quality assurance by encouraging student contributions to an open source web-based system for the assessment of programming assignments. In Proceedings of 13th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE'2008. Madrid, Spain (pp. 214-218).
17. Hsiao, I-H, &, Brusilovsky, P., (2007). Collaborative example authoring system: the value of re-annotation based on community feedback. In, T. Bastiaens, &, S. Carliner, (Eds), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning, E-Learn 2007 (pp. 7122-7131). Quebec City: AACE.
18. Jonassen, D. H., &, Reeves, T. C., (1996). Learning with technology: using computers as cognitive tools. In, David H. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 693-719). New York: Mc Millan.
19. Linn, M. C., (1992). How can hypermedia tools help teach programming. Learning and Instruction, 2, 119-139.
20. Masters, J., Madhyastha, T., &, Shakouri, A., (2008). ExplaNet: a collaborative learning tool and hybrid recommender system for student-authored explanations. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19, 1, 51-74.
21. Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V., Ashley, K., &, Lync, C., (2006). Using collaborative filtering in an intelligent tutoring System for legal argumentation. In, P. Brusilovsky, J. Dron, &, J. Kurhila, (Eds), Proceedings of Workshop on the Social Navigation and Community-Based Adaptation Technologies at the 4th International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (pp. 542-551). Dublin.
22. Pirolli, P. L., &, Anderson, J. R., (1985). The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of recursive programming skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 240-272.
23. Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V., King, A., &, Menke, D., (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 1, 91-109.
24. Recker, M. M., &, Pirolli, P., (1990). A model of self-explanation strategies of instructional text and examples in the acquisition of programming skills. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA, April 16-20, 1990.
25. Robinson, R., (2001). Calibrated peer review: an application to increase student reading and writing skills. The American Biology Teacher, 63, 7, 474-480. (Pubitemid 33385957)
26. Rucker, M. L., &, Thomson, S., (2003). Assessing student learning outcomes: an investigation of the relationship among feedback measures. College Student Journal, 37, September, 400-404.
27. Sitthiworachart, J., &, Joy, M., (2004). Effective peer assessment for learning computer programming. In Proceedings of 9th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE'2004. Leeds, UK (pp. 122-126). (Pubitemid 43773408)
28. van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., &, Pilot, A., (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 1, 19-36. (Pubitemid 43315419)
29. Weber, G., (1996). Individual selection of examples in an intelligent learning environment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7, 1, 3-31.
30. Yudelson, M., &, Brusilovsky, P., (2005). NavEx: providing navigation support for adaptive browsing of annotated code examples. In, C.-K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg, &, J. Breuker, (Eds), Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AI-Ed'2005 (pp. 710-717). Amsterdam: IOS Press Amsterdam, The Netherlands.