The primitive cognitive network process: Comparisons with the analytic hierarchy process

International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 659-680

  Yuen, Kevin Kam Fung ^a  

^a ZIRVE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Decision analysis; multicriteria decision making; optimization; pairwise comparison

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953683783     PISSN: 02196220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219622011004506     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott (eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (Springer, 2005).
2. T. L. Saaty, Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority, Setting, Resource Allocation (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
3. T. L. Saaty, Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005).
4. T. L. Saaty, How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process, European J. Oper. Res. 48 (1990) 9-26.
5. G. L. Fu, C. Yang and G. H. Tzeng, A multicriteria analysis on the strategies to open taiwan's mobile virtual network operators services, Int. J. Inform. Tech. Decision Making 6(1) (2007) 85-112.
6. H.-L. Li and L.-C. Ma, Ranking decision alternatives by integrated Dea, Ahp and Gower plot techniques, Int. J. Inform. Tech. Decision Making 7(1) (2008) 241-258.
7. D. K. Despotis and D. Derpanis, Min-Max goal programming approach to priority derivation in AHP with interval judgements, Int. J. Inform. Techn. Decision Making 7(1) (2008) 175-182.
8. C.-T. Lin, C. Lee and C.-S. Wu, Fuzzy group decision making in pursuit of a competitive marketing strategy, Int. J. Inform. Techn. Decision Making 9(2) (2010) 281-300.
9. Y. Peng, G. Kou, G. Wang, W. Wu and Y. Shi, Ensemble of software defect predictors: An ahp-based evaluation method, Int. J. Inform. Techn. Decision Making 10(1) (2011) 187-206.
10. A. Bhattacharya, J. Geraghty and P. Young, Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment, Appl. Soft Comput. 10(4) (2010) 1013-1027.
11. K. K. F. Yuen, Analytic hierarchy prioritization process in the AHP applications development: A prioritization operator selection approach, Appl. Soft Comput. 10(4) (2010) 975-989.
12. K. K. F. Yuen, Cognitive network process with fuzzy soft computing technique for collective decision aiding, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, PhD thesis (2009).
13. K. K. F. Yuen, The pairwise opposite matrix and its cognitive prioritization operators: The ideal alternatives of the pairwise reciprocal matrix and analytic prioritization operators, J. Oper. Res. Soc., Accepted for publication (2011).
14. G. Crawford and C.Williams, A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices, J. Math. Psychol. 29 (1985) 387-405.
15. A. T. W. Chu, R. E. Kalaba and K. Springarn, A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets, J. Optimization Theo. Appl. 27 (1979) 531-541.
16. L. Mikhailov, A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51(3) (2000) 341-349. (Pubitemid 30566162)
17. N. Bryson, A goal programming method for generating priorities vectors, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 46 (1995) 641-648.
18. C.-C. Lin, An enhanced goal programming method for generating priority vectors, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57 (2006) 1491-1496. (Pubitemid 44771086)
19. V. Belton and T.Gear, On a shortcoming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies, Omega 11(3) (1983) 228-230.
20. J. S. Dyer, A clarification of remarks on the analytic hierarchy process, Manage. Sci. 36(3) (1990) 274-275.
21. J. S. Dyer, Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process, Manage. Sci. 36(3) (1990) 249-258.
22. E. H. Forman and S. I. Gass, The analytic hierarchy process: An exposition, Operations Res. 49(4) (2001) 469-486.
23. Y. M. Wang and T. M. S. Elhag, An approach to avoiding rank reversal in AHP, Decision Support Systems 42 (2006) 1474-1480. (Pubitemid 44648436)
24. R. Whitaker, Criticism of the analytic hierarchy process: Why they often make no sense, Math. Comput. Model. 46 (2007) 948-961. (Pubitemid 47302254)
25. B. Srdjevic, Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis, Comput. Oper. Res. 32(7) (2005) 1897-1919.
26. O. Kulak and C. Kahraman, Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process, Information Sci. 170 (2005) 191-210. (Pubitemid 40183405)