A minmax goal programming approach to priority derivation in AHP with interval judgements

International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 175-182

  Despotis, Dimitris K ^a   Derpanis, Dimitris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PIRAEUS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Goal programming; Interval judgements; Priority setting

Indexed keywords

EID: 43949111039     PISSN: 02196220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219622008002867     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarch Process (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
2. S. Zahir, Eliciting ratio preferences for the analytic hierarchy process with visual interfaces: a new mode of preference measurement, International Journal, of Information Technology and Decision Making 5 (2006) 245-261.
3. N. Ahmad, D. Berg and G. R. Simons, The integration of analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis in a multi-criteria decision-making problem, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 5 (2006) 263-276.
4. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, The possibility of group welfare functions, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 4 (2005) 167-176.
5. A. Zahir, Making public policy decisions using a web-based multi-criteria electoral system, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 1 (2002) 293-309.
6. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Comparisons of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios, Mathematical Modelling 5 (1984) 309-324.
7. D. K. Despotis, Fractional goal programming: a unified approach to priority estimation and preference analysis in MCDM, Journal of the Operational Research Society 47 (1996) 989-999.
8. A. Arbel, Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation, European Journal of Operational Research 43 (1989) 317-326.
9. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research 32 (1987) 107-117.
10. P. G. Van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11 (1983) 229-241.
11. M.-F. Chen, G.-H. Tzeng and T.-I. Tang, Fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of expatriate assignments, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 4 (2005) 277-296.
12. J. J. Buckley, Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17 (1987) 233-247.
13. L. Mikhailov, A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements, European Journal of Operational Research 159 (2004) 687-704.
14. A. A. Salo and R. P. Hamalainen, Processing interval judgments in the analytic hierarchy process, in Multicriteria Decision Making, Proceedings of the IX International Conference on MCDM, eds. A. Goicoechea, L. Duckstein and S. Zionts (Springer, Berlin, 1991), pp. 359-372.
15. A. A. Salo and R-. P. Hamalainen, Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons, European Journal of Operational Research 82 (1995) 458-475.
16. A. Arbel and L. G. Vargas, Preference simulation and preference programming: robustness issues in priority derivation, European Journal of Operational Research 69 (1993) 200-209.
17. M. Lee, H. Pham and X. Zhang, A methodology for priority setting with application to software development process, European Journal of Operational Research 118 (1999) 375-389.
18. A. A. Salo, Inconsistency analysis by approximately specified priorities, Mathematical and Computer Modelling 17 (1993) 123-133.
19. R. Islam, M. P Biswal and S. S. Alam, Preference programming and inconsistent interval judgments, European Journal of Operational Research 97 (1997) 53-62.
20. D. K. Despotis and Y. G. Smirlis, Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data, European Journal of Operational Research 140 (2002) 24-36.