An enhanced goal programming method for generating priority vectors

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 57, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1491-1496

  Lin, C C ^a  

^a KUN SHAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process; Goal programming; Multiple criteria decision making; Pairwise comparison matrix

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; OPTIMIZATION;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESSES; GOAL PROGRAMMING; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRIX;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 33751096701     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602129     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barzilai J (1997). Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices. J Opl Res Soc 48: 1226-1232.
2. Bazaraa MS, Sherali HD and Shetty CM (1993). Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms. Wiley: New York.
3. Blankmeyer E (1987). Approaches to consistency adjustment. J Optimiz Theory App 54: 479-488.
4. Bryson N (1995). A goal programming method for generating priority vectors. J Opl Res Soc 46: 641-648.
5. Bryson N and Joseph A (1999). Generating consensus priority point vectors: a logarithmic goal programming approach. Comput Opns Res 26: 637-643.
6. Bryson N, Mobolurin A and Ngwenyama O (1995). Modelling pairwise comparisons on ratio scales. Eur J Opl Res 83: 639-654.
7. Budescu DV, Zwick R and Rapoport A (1986). A comparison of the eigenvalue method and the geometric mean procedure for ratio scaling. Appl Psych Meas 10: 69-78.
8. Choo EU and Wedley WC (2004). A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. Comput Opns Res 31: 893-908.
9. Crawford G. and Williams C (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. J Math Psychol 29: 387-405.
10. Fichtner J (1986). On deriving priority vectors from matrices of pairwise comparisons. Socio Econ Plan Sci 20: 341-345.
11. Golany B and Kress M (1993). A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. Eur J Opl Res 69: 210-220.
12. Hillier FS and Lieberman GJ (1995). Introduction to Operations Research. McGraw-Hill: New York.
13. Lootsma FA (1996). Model for the relative importance of the criteria in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. Eur J Opl Res 94: 467-476.
14. Saaty T (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill: New York.
15. Saaty TL and Vargas LG (1984). Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios. Math Modelling 5: 309-324.
16. Shim JP (1989). Bibliographical research on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Sacio Econ Plan Sci 23: 161-167.
17. Zahedi F (1986). A simulation study of estimation methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Socio Econ Plan Sci 20: 347-354.