Interactive, multi-modality image registrations for combined MRI/MRSI-planned HDR prostate brachytherapy

Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 26-31

  Reed, Galen ^a   Cunha, J Adam ^a   Noworolski, Susan ^a   Kurhanewicz, John ^a   Vigneron, Daniel ^a   Hsu, I Chow ^a   Pouliot, Jean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

HDR; Image registration; MRSI; Prostate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BLADDER; BRACHYTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOMINANT INTRAPROSATIC LESION; DOSIMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PENIS; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE TUMOR; RADIATION DOSE; RECTUM; TREATMENT PLANNING; URETHRA;

EID: 79953656309     PISSN: 1689832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2011.21040     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hanks GE, Hanlon AL, Schultheiss TE et al. Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 41: 501-510. (Pubitemid 28275077)
2. Perez CA, Hanks GE, Leibel SA et al. Localized carcinoma of the prostate (Stages T1B, T1C, T2, and T3). Review of management with external beam radiation therapy. Cancer 1993; 72: 3156-3173.
3. Hanks GE. Optimizing the radiation treatment and outcome of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985; 11: 1235-1245. (Pubitemid 15067907)
4. Gellekom MPV, Moerland MA, Vulpen MV et al. Quality of life of patients after permanent prostate brachytherapy in relation to dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63: 772-780. (Pubitemid 41400065)
5. Kang SK, Chou RH, Dodge RK et al. Acute urinary toxicity following transperineal prostate brachytherapy using a modified Quimby loading method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 50: 937-945. (Pubitemid 32600040)
6. Yoshioka Y, Konishi K, Oh RJ et al. High-dose-rate brachytherapy without external beam irradiation for locally advanced prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2006; 80: 62-68. (Pubitemid 44226435)
7. Galalae RM, Kovács G, Schultze J et al. Long-term outcome after elective irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics and local dose escalation using high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 52: 81-90. (Pubitemid 34044108)
8. Martinez AA, Gustafson G, Gonzalez J et al. Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 53: 316-327. (Pubitemid 34522097)
9. Martinez A, Gonzalez J, Spencer Wet al. Conformal high dose rate brachytherapy improves biochemical control and cause specific survival in patients with prostate cancer and poor prognostic factors. J Urology 2003; 169: 974-980.
10. Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron D, Hricak H et al. Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm3) spatial resolution. Radiology 1996; 198: 795-805. (Pubitemid 26066301)
11. Scheidler J, Hricak H, Vigneron DB et al. Prostate cancer: localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging-clinicopathologic study. Radiology 1999; 213: 473-480. (Pubitemid 29510595)
12. Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Nelson SJ. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of brain and prostate cancer. Neoplasia 2000; 2: 166-189. (Pubitemid 30123187)
13. Coakley FV, Qayyum A, Kurhanewicz J. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. J Urology 2003; 170 (Suppl 1): S69-S76. (Pubitemid 37413946)
14. Zaider M, Zelefsky MJ, Lee EK et al. Treatment planning for prostate implants using magnetic-resonance spectroscopy imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47: 1085-1096. (Pubitemid 30345610)
15. Kim Y, Hsu ICJ, Lessard E et al. Class solution in inverse planned HDR prostate brachytherapy for dose escalation of DIL defined by combined MRI/MRSI. Radiother Oncol 2008; 88: 148-155.
16. Pouliot J, Kim Y, Lessard E et al. Inverse planning for HDR prostate brachytherapy used to boost dominant intraprostatic lesions defined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59: 1196-1207. (Pubitemid 38834315)
17. Alterovitz R, Goldberg K, Pouliot J et al. Registration of MR prostate images with biomechanical modeling and nonlinear parameter estimation. Med Phys 2006; 33: 446-454. (Pubitemid 43183989)
18. Crouch J, Pizer S, Chaney E et al. Automated finite-element analysis for deformable registration of prostate images. IEEE T Med Imaging 2007; 26: 1379-1390. (Pubitemid 47525299)
19. Kaus MR, Brock KK, Pekar V et al. Assessment of a model-based deformable image registration approach for radiation therapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 68: 572-580. (Pubitemid 46694186)
20. Chappelow J, Both S, Viswanath S et al. Computer-assisted targeted therapy (CATT) for prostate radiotherapy planning by fusion of CT and MRI. Medical Imaging: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Modeling 2010; 7625: 76252C.
21. Cheung MR, Krishnan K. Interactive Deformation Registration of Endorectal Prostate MRI Using ITK Thin Plate Splines. Acad Radiol 2009; 16: 351-357.
22. Venugopal N, McCurdy B, Hnatov A et al. A feasibility study to investigate the use of thin-plate splines to account for prostate deformation. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 2871-2885. (Pubitemid 40771017)
23. Lian J, Xing L, Hunjan S et al. Mapping of the prostate in endorectal coil-based MRI/MRSI and CT: a deformable registration and validation study. Med Phys 2004; 31: 3087-3094. (Pubitemid 39552699)
24. Godley A, Ahunbay E, Peng C et al. Automated registration of large deformations for adaptive radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Med Phys 2009; 36: 1433-1441.
25. Wu X, Dibiase SJ, Gullapalli R et al. Deformable image registration for the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in prostate treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 58: 1577-1583. (Pubitemid 38438323)
26. Kim Y, Hsu ICJ, Pouliot J et al. Expandable and rigid endorectal coils for prostate MRI: Impact on prostate distortion and rigid image registration. Med Phys 2005; 32: 3569-3578.
27. Goshtasby A. Image registration by local approximation methods. Image Vision Comput 1988; 6: 255-261.
28. Cunningham C, Vigneron D, MarjanskaM et al. Sequence design for magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer at 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 1033-1039. (Pubitemid 40627778)
29. Chen A, Cunningham C, Ozturk-Isik E et al. High-speed 3T MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate with flyback echo-planar encoding. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1288-1292. (Pubitemid 46870289)
30. Schricker AA, Pauly JM, Kurhanewicz J et al. Dualband spectral-spatial RF pulses for prostate MR spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 255-261.
31. Tran TKC, Vigneron DB, Sailasuta N et al. Very selective suppression pulses for clinical MRSI studies of brain and prostate cancer. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 23-33. (Pubitemid 30027109)
32. Nelson SJ, Brown TR. A new method for automatic quantification of 1-D Spectra with low signal to noise ratio. J Magn Reson 1987; 75: 229-243.
33. Jung JA, Coakley FV, Vigneron DB et al. Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system. Radiology 2004; 233: 701-708.
34. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D et al. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997; 16: 187-198. (Pubitemid 127762930)