Contextual environment and stakeholder perception of corporate social responsibility practices in uganda

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 102-109

  Bagire, Vincent Amooti ^a   Tusiime, Immaculate ^a   Nalweyiso, Grace ^a   Kakooza, John Bosco ^a  

^a MAKERERE UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Uganda)

Author keywords

Community action; Contextual environment; Corporate social investment; Corporate social responsibility; Marketing; Marketing tool; Philanthropy; Stakeholder perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953322033     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: 15353966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.252     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Calabrese A, Lancioni F. 2008. Analysis of corporate social responsibility in the services sector: Does exist a strategic path? Knowledge and Process Management 15: 107-125. DOI: 10.1002/kpm.303
2. Carroll AB. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34: 39-48.
3. Coelho PR, McClure JE, Spry J. 2003. The social responsibility of corporate management: a classic critique. In Ziek P. 2009. Making Sense of CSR Communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 137-145. DOI: 10.1002/csr.183
4. Dahlsrud A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15: 1-13. DOI: 10.1002/csr.132
5. Ditlev-Simonsen CD, Midttun A. 2010. What motivates managers to pursue Corporate Responsibility? A survey among key stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. DOI: 10.1002/csr.237
6. Dobers P. 2009. Corporate social responsibility: Management and methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 185-191. DOI: 10.1002/csr.201
7. Dobers P, Halme M. 2009. Corporate social responsibility and developing countries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 237-249. DOI: 10.1002/csr.212
8. Elkington J. 2006. Governance for sustainability. In Ziek P. 2009. Making Sense of CSR Communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 137-145. DOI: 10.1002/csr.183
9. Fougere M, Solitander N. 2009. Against corporate responsibility. Critical reflections on thinking, practice, content and consequences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 217-227. DOI:10.1002/csr.204
10. Frankental P. 2001. Corporate social responsibility - a PR invention? Corporate Communications: An International Journal 6: 18-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13563280110381170
11. Gobbels M. 2002. Reframing corporate social responsibility: the contemporary conception of a fuzzy notion. In Dahlsrud A. 2008. How Corporate Social Responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management 15: 1-13.
12. Hinkin TR. 1995. A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management 21: 967-988.
13. Ingham Sir B. 2006. CSR: A wolf in sheep's skin. Journal of Public Affairs 6: 283-285. DOI 10.1002/pa
14. Jensen M. 2001. Value maximization, stakeholder theory and corporate objective function. Harvard Business Review 7: 297.
15. Jye YL, Castka P. 2009. Corporate Social Responsibility in Malaysia - Expert views and perspectives. Corporate Social Responsibility and Management 16: 146-159. DOI:10.1002/csr.184
16. Katamba D, Sabine G, Slowinski A. 2008. CSR in Uganda: Perceptions, Approaches and Needs of Companies. DED: Kampala.
17. Kibera F. 1996. Introduction to Business, Kenya Literature Review: Nairobi.
18. Kuhn T, Deetz S. 2008. A critical management theory view on corporate social responsibility. In Ziek P. 2009. Making sense of CSR communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 137-145. DOI: 10.1002/csr.183
19. Kusku F. 2007. From necessity to responsibility: Evidences for corporate environmental citizenship activities from a developing country perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14: 74-87. DOI: 10.1002/csr.119
20. Mallen B. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility News Resources, [July 2009]
21. Mette M, Schutz M. 2006. Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European View 15: 323-338.
22. Munilla LS, Miles MP. 2005. The corporate social responsibility continuum as a component of stakeholder theory. Business and Society Review 110: 371-387.
23. Ndhlovu TP. 2009. Conceptualizing corporate social responsibility and corporate social investment: The South African context. IAABD Conference Paper. IAABD: Kampala May 19-23; pp 69-77.
24. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. 1994. Psychometric Theory. In Black LD and Hartel CEJ.2003. The five capabilities of socially responsible companies. Journal of Public Affairs 4: 125-144.
25. Pearce JA, Robbinson RB Jr. 2002. Strategic Management- Strategy Formulation and Implementation. All India Traveller: New Delhi.
26. Sangle S. 2009. Critical success factors for corporate social responsibility: a public sector perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 205-214. DOI: 10.1002/csr.200
27. Tracey K, Malnight TW, van der Graff K. 2009. Making the most of Corporate Social Responsibility. Mackinsey Quarterly Dec: 1-8.
28. Tulder RJM. 2003. The strategic use of international business community involvement. In Dahlsrud A. 2008. How corporate social desponsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management 15: 1-13.
29. Vogel D. 2005. The market for virtue. The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. In Ziek P. (2009). Making sense of CSR Communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 137-145. DOI: 10.1002/csr.183
30. Vos Janita IJ. 2003. Corporate social responsibility and the identification of stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10: 141-153. DOI: 10.1002/csr.039
31. Walker RM, Enticcot G. 2004. Using multiple informants in public administration: revisiting the managerial values and actions debate. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14: 417-434.
32. Wong A, Fu L, Elankumaran S. 2009. Business students' perception of corporate social responsibility: The United States, China, and India. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 299-310. DOI:10.1002/csr.216
33. Ziek P. 2009. Making sense of CSR communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16: 137-145. DOI: 10.1002/csr.183