Corporate social responsibility and the identification of stakeholders

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 141-152

  Vos, Janita F J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0842323774     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.39     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Ackerman RW, Bauer RA. 1976. Corporate Social Responsiveness, The Modern Dilemma. Reston Publishing Company: Reston, VA.
2. Agle BR, Mitchell RK, Sonnenfeld JA. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 507-525.
3. Carroll AB. 1999. Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society 38(3): 268-295.
4. Clarkson MBE. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92-117.
5. de Leeuw ACJ, Volberda HW. 1996. On the concept of flexibility: a dual control perspective. Omega, International Journal of Management Science 24(2): 121-139.
6. Donaldson T, Preston LE. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65-91.
7. Flood RL, Jackson MC. 1991. Creative Problem Solving. Total Systems Intervention. Wiley: Chichester.
8. Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Pitman-Ballinger: Boston.
9. Freeman RE. 1994. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In Ethical Theory and Business 5th edn, Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE (eds). Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ; 66-76.
10. Friedman M. 1997. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Ethical Theory and Business 5th edn, Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE (eds). Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ (original work published 1970 in New York Times Magazine 13 September).
11. Goodpaster KE. 1998. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. In The Corporation and its Stakeholders. Classic and Contemporary Readings, Clarkson MBE (ed.). University of Toronto Press; 103-123 (original work published in 1991).
12. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4): 853-886.
13. Takala T, Pallab P. 2000. Individual, collective and social responsibility of the firm. Business Ethics: a European Review 9(2): 109-118.
14. Ulrich W. 1983. Critical Heuristics of Social Planning. A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Wiley: Chichester.
15. Ulrich W. 1988. Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: a program of research. Systems Practice 1(2): 137-163.
16. Website Redefining the Corporation. 2000. http://www.mgmt.utoronto.ca/ ~stake/Principles.htm [31 January 2002].
17. Wempe J. 1998. Market and Morality. Business Ethics and the Dirty and Many Hands Dilemma. Eburon: Delft.
18. Wood DJ. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16(4): 691-719.