Corporate social responsibility in Malaysia -experts' views and perspectives

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 146-154

  Lu, Jye Y ^a   Castka, Pavel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; CSR practices; Experts; Malaysia

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649304774     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: 15353966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.184     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ahmad NN, Rahim NLA. 2003. Awareness of the concept of corporate social responsibility among Malaysian managers in selected public listed companies. Paper presented at The Seventh International Conference on Global Business and Economic Development, April 20-23. Bangkok, Thailand.
2. Anderson CL, Bieniaszewska RL. 2005. The role of corporate social responsibility in an oil company's expansion into new territories. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12: 1-9.
3. Castka P, Balzarova MA, Bamber C, Sharp J. 2004. How can SMEs effectively implement the CSR agenda - a UK case study perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11: 140-149.
4. Castka P, Balzarova MA. 2008a. ISO 26000 and supply chains - on the diffusion of the social responsibility standard. International Journal of Production Economics 111: 274-286.
5. Castka P, Balzarova MA. 2008b. The impact of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 on standardization of social responsibility - an inside perspective. International Journal of Production Economics 113: 74-87.
6. Chapple W, Moon J. 2005. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business Society 44: 415-441.
7. Dahlsrud A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15: 1-13
8. Devi SS. 2003. Corporate governance as an evolutionary process: a Malaysian perspective. In United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. United Nations: New York; 53-59.
9. Garriga E, Melé D. 2004. Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53: 51-71.
10. ISO/TMB/WG/SR. 2006. Participating in the future International Standard ISO 26000 on social responsibility. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva.
11. Lepoutre J, Heene A. 2006. Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics 67: 257-271.
12. Miles M, Huberman M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. A Sourcebook of New Methods. Sage: London.
13. Moyser G, Wagstaffe M. 1987. Research methods for elite studies. Unwin Hyman: London.
14. Ramasamy B, Ting HW. 2004. A comparative analysis of corporate social responsibility awareness: Malaysian and Singaporean firms. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 13: 109-123.
15. Rao S, Perry C. 2003. Convergent interviewing to build a theory in under-researched areas: principles and an example investigation of Internet usage in inter-firm relationships. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 6: 236-247.
16. Rashid MZA, Ibrahim S. 2002. Executive and management attitudes towards corporate social responsibility in Malaysia. Corporate Governance 2: 10-16.
17. Thompson P, Zakaria Z. 2004 Corporate social responsibility reporting in Malaysia: progress and prospects. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 13: 125-136.
18. WBCSD. 1999. Corporate social Responsibility. World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Geneva, Switzerland.
19. Welford R, Frost S. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in Asian supply chains. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13: 166-176
20. Zulkifli N, Amran A. 2006. Realising Corporate Social Responsibility in Malaysia: A View from the Accounting Profession. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 24: 101-114.