Critical success factors for corporate social responsibility: A public sector perspective

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 205-214

  Sangle, Shirish ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING NITIE   (India)

Author keywords

Critical factors; CSR; Multiple regression and factorial analysis; Public sector units

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955449019     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: 15353966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.200     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Barnett ML Salomon RM. 2006. Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and economic performance in top British companies: are they linked? European Business Review 98(10): 25-42.
2. Baron DP. 1995. Integrated strategy: market and non-market components. California Management Review 37(2): 47-65.
3. Berman S et al. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 42: 488-506.
4. Beurden P, Gossling T. 2008. The worth of values - a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 82: 407-424.
5. Blacconiere WG, Patten DM. 1994. Environmental disclosure, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18(3): 357-377.
6. Boiral O. 2006. Global warming: should companies adopt a proactive strategy? Long Range Planning 39(3): 315-330.
7. Brown B. 1998. Do stock market investor reward companies with reputation for social performance? Corporate Reputation Review 1(3): 271-280.
8. Burke L, Logsdon J. 1996. How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning 29(4): 495-502.
9. Buysse K, Verbeke A. 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal 24: 453-470.
10. Carter CR, Kale R, Grimm CM. 2000. Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Transportation Research 36(E): 219-228.
11. Chakraborty SK. 1997. Business ethics in India. Journal of Business Ethics 16: 1529-1538.
12. Clarkson MB. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92-117.
13. Collins L, Usher S. 2004. Project PASCALEA - public and stakeholder consultation in developing high-profile corporate environmental strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11: 95-102.
14. Cummins A. 2004. The marine stewardship council - a multi-stakeholder approach to sustainable fishing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11: 85-94.
15. Davis K. 1977. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. In Managing Corporate Social Responsibility, Carroll A (ed.). Little, Brown: Boston, MA; 34-45.
16. Dowell G, Hart S, Yeung B. 2000. Do corporate global environment standards create or destroy market value? Management Science 46(8): 1059-1074.
17. European Multi Stakeholder Forum on Corporate Social Responsibility, June 2004. Brussels, Belgium.
18. Fischer CM, Shirole R, Bhupatkar AP. 2001. Ethical stances in Indian management culture. Personal Review 30(6): 694-710.
19. Freedman M, Stagliano AJ. 1991. Differences in social-costs disclosures: a market test of investor reactions. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 4(1): 68-83.
20. Frooman J. 1999. Stakeholder infl uence strategies. Academy of Management Review 24: 191-205.
21. Gabel HL, Sinclair-Desgange B. 1997. Environmental auditing in management system and public policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33: 331-346.
22. George D, Mallery P. 2003. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 11.0 update. Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA.
23. Goll I, Rasheed AA. 2004. The moderating environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics 49(1): 41-54.
24. Graves SB, Waddock SA. 1999. A look at the financial-social performance nexus when quality of management is held constant. International Journal of Value-Based Management 12(1): 87-99.
25. Hart S. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of firm. Academy of Management Review 20: 986-1014.
26. Hart S, Ahuja G. 1996. Does it pay to be green? Business Strategy and the Environment 5: 31-37.
27. Hart S, Sharma S. 2004. Engaging fringe stakeholder for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Review 18: 7-18.
28. He Y, Tian Z, Chen Y. 2007. Performance implications of nonmarket strategy in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 24(2): 151-169.
29. Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1996. The determinants of environmentally responsive firm: an empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 381-395.
30. Herremans IM, Akathaporn P, McInnes M. 1993. An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance. Accounting Organizations and Society 18(7/8): 587-604.
31. Hillman A, Keim G. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22: 125-139.
32. Hunt CB, Auster ER. 1990. Proactive environmental management: avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review Winter: 7-18.
33. Ilinitch AY, Schaltegger S. 1995. Developing a green business portfolio. Long Range Planning 28(2): 29-38.
34. Judge WQ Jr, Douglas TJ. 1998. Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into strategic planning process: an empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies 35(2): 241-262.
35. Klassen RD, McLaughlin CP. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science 42(8): 1199-1214.
36. Kumar R, Murphy D, Basari V. 2002. Altered Images: the 2001 State of Corporate Responsibility in India Poll. New Delhi: Tata Energy Research Institute.
37. Leidecker JK, Bruno AV. 1984. Identifying and using critical successful factors. Long-Range Planning 17(1): 23-32.
38. Luo X, Bhattacharya CB. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing 70(1): 1-18.
39. Matias JC, Coelho DA. 2002. The integration of standards systems of quality management, environmental management and occupational health and safety management. International Journal of Production Research 40(15): 3857-3866.
40. Mitchell R, Agle B, Wood D. 1997. Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22: 853-886.
41. Pava ML, Krausz J. 1996. The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics 15(3): 321-357.
42. Peinado-Vara E. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in Latin America. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 21(1): 61-69.
43. Porter ME. 1985. Competitive Advantage. Free Press: New York.
44. Porter ME, Kramer KR. 2006. Strategy and society - the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 34: 1-14.
45. Preston LE, O'Bannon DP. 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: a typology and analysis. Business and Society 36(4):419-429.
46. Rowley T. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder infl uences. Academy of Management Review 22: 887-910.
47. Ruf BM, Muralidhar K, Brown RM, Janney JJ, Paul K. 2001. An empirical investigation of the relationship between corporate social performance and financial performance: a stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 32(2): 143-156.
48. Rumelt R. 1980. The evaluation of business strategy. In Business Policy and Strategic Management, 3rd edn, Glueck WF (ed.). McGraw-Hill: New York; 359-367.
49. Russo MV, Fouts PA. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Review 40: 534-559.
50. Schnietz KE, Epstein MJ. 2005. Exploring financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Review 7(4): 327-345.
51. Sharma S, Henriques I. 2005. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest product industry. Strategic Management Journal 26: 159-180.
52. Sharma S, Vredenburg H. 1998. Proactive environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19: 729-753.
53. Shrivastava H, Venkateswaran S. 2000. The Business of Social Responsibility. Books for Change: Bangalore, India.
54. Stanwick PA, Stanwick SD. 1998. The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance and environmental performance: an empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17(2): 195-204.
55. Starik M, Rands G. 1995. Weaving an integrated web: multilevel and multi system perspectives of ecologically sustainable organization. Academy of Management Review 20: 908-935.
56. Steiner GC. 1980. An overview of the changing business environment and its impact on business. In Business Environment and Public Policy: 1979 Conference Papers, Preston LE (ed.). St. Louis, MO; 3-18.
57. Sundar P. 2000. Beyond Business: From Merchant Charity to Corporate Citizenship. Tata McGraw Hill: New Delhi.
58. Waddock S, Graves S. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18: 303-319.
59. Wagner M. 2007. Integration of environmental management with other managerial functions of the firm: empirical effects on drivers of economic performance. Long Range Planning 40: 611-628.