Business students' perception of corporate social responsibility: The United States, China, and India

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 299-310

  Wong, Alan ^a   Long, Fu ^b   Elankumaran, S ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTHEAST   (United States)

^b WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c T A PAI MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Cultural difference; Environmental policy; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957126012     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: 15353966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.216     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arlow P. 1991. Personal characteristics in college students' evaluations of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 10(1): 63-69.
2. Bisoux T. 2008. The socially responsible curriculum. BizEd 7(4): 22-30.
3. Bombardieri M. 2005. Harvard to sell its stake in firm tied to Sudan. The Boston Globe 5(April): A1.
4. Carroll AB. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 4: 497-505.
5. Chapple W, Moon J. 2007. CSR agendas for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14(4): 183-188.
6. Christie PMJ, Kwon IG, Stoeberl PA, Baumhart R. 2003. A cross-cultural comparison of ethical attitudes of business managers: India, Korea and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 46: 263-287.
7. Cordeiro WP. 2003. The only solution to the decline in business ethics: Ethical managers. Teaching Business Ethics 7: 265-278.
8. Dahlsrud A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15(1): 1-13.
9. Denker I, Sidwell M (eds). 2008. Transparency International Annual Report 2007. Transparency International: Berlin.
10. Frost S, Ho M. 2005. Going out: The growth of Chinese foreign direct investment in Southeast Asia and its implications for corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12(3): 157-167.
11. Gouldson A. 2006. Do firms adopt lower standards in poorer areas? Corporate social responsibility and environmental justice in the EU and the US. Area 38: 402-412.
12. Grace D, Cohen S. 2005. Business ethics: Australian problems and cases. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
13. Haglund D. 2008. Regulating FDI in weak African States: A case study of Chinese copper mining in Zambia. The Journal of Modern African Studies 46: 547-575.
14. Harvey B. 1999. 'Graceful merchants': A contemporary view of Chinese business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 20(1): 85-92.
15. Hofstede GH. 1997. Cultures & organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill: London.
16. Hofstede G, Bond MH. 1988. The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics 16: 4-21.
17. Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ. 2005. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (5th Edition). McGraw-Hill: New York.
18. Keenan JP. 2002. Comparing Indian and American managers on whistle-blowing. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 14: 79-89.
19. Lam D, Paltiel JT, Shannon JH. 1994. The Confucian entrepreneur? Chinese culture, industrial organization, and intellectual property. Asian Affairs: An American Review 20: 205-217.
20. Lee K. 1991. Chinese firms and the state in transition: Property rights and agency problems in the reform era. M. E. Sharpe: Armonk, New York.
21. Mascolo MF, Misra G, Rapisardi C. 2004. Individual and relational conceptions of self in India and the United States. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 104: 9-26.
22. McMahon TF. 1986. Models of the relationship of the firm to society. Journal of Business Ethics 5: 181-191.
23. Miller JG, Bersoff DM, Harwood RL. 1990. Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 33-47.
24. Navarro P. 2008. Business schools: A study in failure. Business Week Online April 23:Page 8.
25. Nie JB. 2005. Cultural values embodying universal norms: A critique of a popular assumption about cultures and human tights. Developing World Bioethics 5(3): 251-257.
26. Paul P, Roy A, Mukhopadhyay K. 2006. The impact of cultural values on marketing ethical norms: A study in India & the United States. Journal of International Marketing 14: 28-56.
27. Prinsloo P, Buekes C, De Jongh D. 2006. Corporate citizenship education for responsible business leaders. Development Southern Africa 23: 197-211.
28. Redding SG. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Walter de Gruyter: Berlin.
29. Shinn S. 2005. Sustainability at the core. BizEd 4(5): 30-38.
30. Vitell SJ, Nwachukwu SL, Barnes JH. 1993. The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: An application of Hofstede's typology. Journal of Business Ethics 12: 753-760.
31. Wang JF, Piron F, Xuan MV. 2001. Faring one thousand miles to give goose feathers: Gift giving in the People's Republic of China. Advances in Consumer Research 28(1): 58-63.
32. Welford R. 2007. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Issues for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14(1): 42-51.
33. Welford R, Frost S. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in Asian supply chains. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13(3): 166-176.
34. Whitcomb LL, Erdener CB, Li C. 1998. Business ethical values in China and the U.S. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 839-852.
35. Zadek S, MacGillivray A (eds). 2007. The state of responsible competitiveness 2007: Making sustainable development count in global markets. AccountAbility: Washington, DC.