Perceptual biases for rhythm: The Mismatch Negativity latency indexes the privileged status of binary vs non-binary interval ratios

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 118, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2709-2715

  Pablos Martin, X ^a   Deltenre, P ^b,c   Hoonhorst, I ^b,d   Markessis, E ^b   Rossion, B ^a,d   Colin, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^c BRUGMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^d FNRS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Interval ratio; Mismatch Negativity; MMN latency; Rhythm perception; Sensory memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY MEMORY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MUSIC; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERIODICITY; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 36549072134     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.08.019     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bergeson T., and Trehub S. Infants perception of rhythmic patterns. Music Percept 23 (2006) 345-360
2. Brand A., Urban R., and Grothe B. Duration tuning in the mouse auditory midbrain. J Neurophysiol 84 (2000) 1790-1799
3. Brochard R., Abecasis D., Potter D., Ragot R., and Drake C. The "ticktock" of our internal clock: direct brain evidence of subjective accents in isochronous sequences. Psychol Sci 14 (2003) 362-366
4. Casseday J.H., Ehrlich D., and Covey E. Neural tuning for sound duration: role of inhibitory mechanisms in the inferior colliculus. Science 264 (1994) 847-850
5. Casseday J.H., Ehrlich D., and Covey E. Neural measurement of sound duration: control by excitatory-inhibitory interactions in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 84 (2000) 1475-1487
6. Deacon D., Nousak J.M., Pilotti M., Ritter W., and Yang C.M. Automatic change detection: does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts?. Psychophysiology 35 (1998) 413-419
7. Desain P., and Honing H. The formation of rhythmic categories and metric priming. Perception 32 (2003) 341-365
8. Dowling W.J., and Harwood D. Music cognition (1986), Academic Press, New York
9. Drake C. Reproduction of musical rhythms by children, adult musicians, and adult nonmusicians. Percept Psychophys 53 (1993) 25-33
10. Drake C. Motor and perceptually preferred synchronisation by children and adults: binary and ternary ratios. Polish Q Dev Psychol 3 (1997) 43-61
11. Drake C., and Botte M.C. Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences: evidence for a multiple-look model. Percept Psychophys 54 (1993) 277-286
12. Drake C., and Gérard C. A psychological pulse train: how young children use this cognitive framework to structure simple rhythms. Psychol Res 51 (1989) 16-22
13. Ehrlich D., Casseday J.H., and Covey E. Neural tuning to sound duration in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J Neurophysiol 77 (1997) 2360-2372
14. Gomes H., Bernstein R., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G., and Miller J. Storage of feature conjunctions in transient auditory memory. Psychophysiology 34 (1997) 712-716
15. He J., Hashikawa T., Ojima H., and Kinouchi Y. Temporal integration and duration tuning in the dorsal zone of cat auditory cortex. J Neurosci 17 (1997) 2615-2625
16. Jääskelaäinen I.P., Ahveninen J., Bonmassar G., Dale A.M., Ilmoniemi R.J., and Levänen S. Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 17 (2004) 6809-6814
17. Jacobsen T., and Schröger E. Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison for pitch?. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 723-727
18. Jacobsen T., Schröger E., Horenkamp T., and Winkler I. Mismatch negativity to pitch change: varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory event-related brain potentials. Neurosci Lett 344 (2003) 79-82
19. Jaramillo M., Paavilainen P., and Näätänen R. Mismatch negativity and behavioural discrimination in humans as a function of the magnitude of change in sound duration. Neurosci Lett 290 (2000) 101-104
20. Jusczyk P.W., and Derrah C. Representation of speech sounds by young infants. Dev Psychol 23 (1987) 648-654
21. Kraus N., McGee T., Carrell T.D., and Sharma A. Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination. Ear Hear 16 (1995) 19-37
22. Kujala T., Kallio J., Tervaniemi M., and Näätänen R. The mismatch negativity as an index of temporal processing in audition. Clin Neurophysiol 112 (2001) 1712-1719
23. Kurtzberg D., Vaughan Jr. H.G., Kreuzer J.A., and Fliegler K.Z. Developmental studies and clinical application of mismatch negativity: problems and prospects. Ear Hear 16 (1995) 105-117
24. Lang H., Eerola O., Korpilahti P., Holopainen I., Salo S., and Aaltonen O. Practical issues in the clinical application of mismatch negativity. Ear Hear 16 (1995) 117-129
25. Large E.W., and Crawford J.D. Auditory temporal computation: interval selectivity based on post-inhibitory rebound. J Comput Neurosci 13 (2002) 125-142
26. Mauk M.D., and Buonomano D.V. The neural basis of temporal processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 27 (2004) 307-340
27. McGee T., Kraus N., and Nicol T. Is it really a mismatch negativity? An assessment of methods for determining response validity in individual subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 104 (1997) 359-368
28. McGee T.J., King C., Tremblay K., Nicol T.G., Cunningham J., and Kraus N. Long-term habituation of the speech-elicited mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 653-658
29. Näätänen R. The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear 16 (1995) 6-12
30. Näätänen R. Mismatch Negativity: clinical research and possible applications. Int J Psychophyiol 48 (2003) 179-188
31. Näätänen R., and Alho K. Mismatch negativity - a unique measure of sensory processing in audition. Intern J Neurosci 80 (1995) 317-337
32. Näätänen R., Jacobsen T., and Winkler I. Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 25-32
33. Näätänen R., Jiang D., Lavikainen J., Reinikainen K., and Paavilainen P. Event-related potentials reveal a memory trace for temporal features. NeuroReport 5 (1993) 310-312
34. Näätänen R., Lehtokoski A., Lennes M., Cheour M., Huotilainen M., Livonen A., et al. Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature 385 (1997) 432-434
35. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Alho K., Reinikainen K., and Sams M. Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain?. Neurosci Lett 98 (1989) 217-221
36. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., and Reinikainen K. Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man?. Neurosci Lett 107 (1989) 347-352
37. Pakarinen S., Takegata R., Rinne T., Huotilainen M., and Näätänen R. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Clin Neurophysiol 118 (2007) 177-185
38. Repp B.H. Probing the cognitive representation of musical time: structural constraints on the perception of timing perturbations. Cognition 44 (1992) 241-281
39. Ritter W., Deacon D., Gomes H., Javitt D.C., and Vaughan HG J. The mismatch negativity of event-related potentials as a probe of transient auditory memory: a review. Ear Hear 16 (1995) 52-67
40. Sakai K., Hikosaka O., Miyauchi S., Takino R., Tamada T., Iwata N.K., et al. Neural representation of a rhythm depends on its interval ratio. J Neurosci 19 (1999) 10074-10081
41. Sams M., Paavilainen P., Alho K., and Näätänen R. Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62 (1985) 437-448
42. Sams M., Hari R., Rif J., and Knuutila J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 s: neuromagnetic evidence. J Cogn Neurosci 5 (1993) 363-370
43. Sussmann E., Gomes H., Nousak J.M.K., Ritter W., and Vaughan Jr. H.G. Feature conjunctions and auditory sensory memory. Brain Res 793 (1998) 95-102
44. Takegata R., Paavilainen P., Näätänen R., and Winkler I. Independent processing of changes in auditory single features and feature conjunctions as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Neurosci Lett 266 (1999) 109-112
45. Tiitinen H., May P., Reinikainen K., and Näätänen R. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature 372 (1994) 90-92
46. Vuust P., Pallesen K.J., Bailey C., van Zuijen T.L., Gjedde A., Roepstorff A., et al. To musicians, the message is in the meter - pre-attentive neuronal responses to incongruent rhythm are left-lateralized in musicians. NeuroImage 24 (2005) 560-564
47. Winkler I., and Schröger E. Neural representation of the temporal structure of sound patterns. NeuroReport 6 (1995) 690-694