Precision analysis of kinetic modelling estimates in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 51-66

  De Naeyer, Dieter ^a   De Deene, Yves ^b,c   Ceelen, Wim P ^b   Segers, Patrick ^a   Verdonck, Pascal ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Confidence interval; DCE MRI; Experiment design; Kinetic modelling; Precision analysis

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; KINETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 79953293510     PISSN: 09685243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-010-0235-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. HJWL Aerts NAW van Riel WH Backes 2008 System identification theory in pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: influence of contrast injection Magn Reson Med 59 5 1111 1119 18429040 10.1002/mrm.21575 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3nsleksQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 351590525)
2. MLW Ah-See A Makris NJ Taylor M Harrison PI Richman RJ Burcombe JJ Stirling JA d'Arcy DJ Collins MR Pittam D Ravichandran AR Padhani 2008 Early changes in functional dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predict for pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer Clin Cancer Res 14 20 6580 6589 18927299 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4310 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD1cXht1KgtbfK
3. T Barrett H Kobayashi M Brechbiel PL Choyke 2006 Macromolecular MRI contrast agents for imaging tumor angiogenesis Eur J Radiol 60 3 353 366 16930905 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.06.025
4. Te Batchelor 2007 AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients Cancer Cell 11 1 83 95 17222792 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.021 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXhtFClsLc%3D (Pubitemid 46075199)
5. Bernstein M, King K, JZ X (2004) Basic pulse sequences. In: Handbook of MRI pulse sequences, vol 1. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, p 1017
6. JM Bonny L Foucat W Laurent JP Renou 1998 Optimization of signal intensity and T1-dependent contrast with nonstandard flip angles in spin-echo and inversion-recovery MR imaging J Magn Reson 130 1 51 57 9469896 10.1006/jmre.1997.1273 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXitVKgurg%3D (Pubitemid 128450511)
7. DL Buckley 2002 Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T-1-weighted MRI Magn Reson Med 47 3 601 606 11870848 10.1002/mrm.10080 (Pubitemid 34194016)
8. F Calamante E Vonken M van Osch 2007 Contrast agent concentration measurements affecting quantification of bolus-tracking perfusion MRI Magn Reson Med 58 3 544 553 17763347 10.1002/mrm.21362 (Pubitemid 350154965)
9. S Cavassila S Deval C Huegen D van Ormondt D Graveron-Demilly 2001 Cramer-rao bounds: an evaluation tool for quantitation NMR Biomed 14 4 278 283 11410946 10.1002/nbm.701 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXlt1Gls78%3D (Pubitemid 32611440)
10. W Ceelen P Smeets W Backes N Van Damme T Boterberg P Demetter I Bouckenooghe M De Visschere M Peeters P Pattyn 2006 Noninvasive monitoring of radiotherapy-induced microvascular changes using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in a colorectal tumor model Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64 4 1188 1196 16457965 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.10.026
11. DJ Collins AR Padhani 2004 Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of tumor perfusion IEEE Eng Med Biol 23 5 65 83 10.1109/MEMB.2004.1360410 (Pubitemid 39545969)
12. Y De Deene R Van de Walle E Achten C De Wagter 1998 Mathematical analysis and experimental investigation of noise in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging applied in polymer gel dosimetry Signal Process 70 2 85 101 10.1016/S0165-1684(98)00115-7 (Pubitemid 128421085)
13. P Di Giovanni C Azlan TS Ahearn SI Semple FJ Gilbert TW Redpath 2010 The accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of the breast at 3T Phys Med Biol 55 1 32 121 10.1088/0031-9155/55/1/008
14. E Furman-Haran E Schechtman F Kelcz K Kirshenbaum H Degani 2005 Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional diversity of the vasculature in benign and malignant breast lesions Cancer-Am Cancer Soc 104 4 708 718 (Pubitemid 41113669)
15. SM Galbraith MA Lodge NJ Taylor GJS Rustin S Bentzen JJ Stirling AR Padhani 2002 Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis NMR Biomed 15 2 132 142 11870909 10.1002/nbm.731 (Pubitemid 34213403)
16. V Goh AR Padhani S Rasheed 2007 Functional imaging of colorectal cancer angiogenesis Lancet Oncol 8 3 245 255 17329195 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70075-X (Pubitemid 46291714)
17. H Gudbjartsson S Patz 1995 The rician distribution of noisy MRI data Magn Reson Med 34 2 910 914 8598820 10.1002/mrm.1910340618 1:STN:280: DyaK287mslKqtQ%3D%3D
18. M Heilmann F Kiessling M Enderlin LR Schad 2006 Determination of pharmacokinetic parameters in DCE MRI-consequence of nonlinearity between contrast agent concentration and signal intensity Invest Radiol 41 6 536 543 16763473 10.1097/01.rli.0000209607.99200.53 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XlsVeqs7Y%3D (Pubitemid 44284189)
19. E Henderson BK Rutt TY Lee 1998 Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease Magn Reson Imaging 16 9 1057 1073 9839990 10.1016/S0730-725X(98)00130-1 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FltlOhtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29196842)
20. JT Heverhagen H von Tengg-Kobligk KT Baudendistel G Jia H Polzer H Henry AL Levine TJ Rosol MV Knopp 2004 Benign prostate hyperplasia: evaluation of treatment response with DCE MRI Magn Reson Mater Phy 17 1 5 11 10.1007/s10334-004-0040-1 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crhtVOqtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39390398)
21. F Kiessling M Lichy R Grobholz N Farhan M Heilmann MS Michel L Trojan A Werner J Rabe S Delorme HU Kauczor HP Schlemmer 2003 Detection of prostate carcinomas with T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhance MRI value of two-compartment model Radiologe 43 6 474 480 12827262 10.1007/s00117-003-0911-x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3pvFKhtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36841594)
22. TS Koh CH Thng PS Lee S Hartono H Rumpel BC Goh S Bisdas 2008 Hepatic metastases: in vivo assessment of perfusion parameters at dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with dual-input two-compartment tracer kinetics model Radiology 249 1 307 320 18695207 10.1148/radiol.2483071958
23. RGP Lopata WH Backes PPJ van den Bosch NAW van Riel 2007 On the identifiability of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging Magn Reson Med 58 2 425 429 17654583 10.1002/mrm.21336 (Pubitemid 47267663)
24. A Macovski 1996 Noise in mri Magn Reson Med 36 3 494 497 8875425 10.1002/mrm.1910360327 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FivFCitg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 126789497)
25. I Ocak M Bernardo G Metzger T Barrett P Pinto PS Albert PL Choyke 2007 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters Am J Roentgenol 189 4 W192 W201 10.2214/AJR.06.1329
26. AR Padhani 2002 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: Current status and future directions J Magn Reson Imaging 16 4 407 422 12353256 10.1002/jmri.10176 (Pubitemid 35167876)
27. AR Padhani C Hayes S Landau MO Leach 2002 Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues NMR Biomed 15 2 143 153 11870910 10.1002/nbm.732 (Pubitemid 34213404)
28. GJM Parker C Roberts A Macdonald GA Buonaccorsi S Cheung DL Buckley A Jackson Y Watson K Davies GC Jayson 2006 Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Magn Reson Med 56 5 993 1000 17036301 10.1002/mrm.21066 (Pubitemid 44691341)
29. C Preibisch R Deichmann 2009 Influence of RF spoiling on the stability and accuracy of T-1 mapping based on spoiled FLASH with varying flip angles Magn Reson Med 61 1 125 135 19097220 10.1002/mrm.21776 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1M%2Fgs12ksw%3D%3D
30. C Radhakrishna Rao 1945 Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters Bull Calcutta Math Soc 37 81 91
31. M Rohrer H Bauer J Mintorovitch M Requardt HJ Weinmann 2005 Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths Invest Radiol 40 11 715 724 16230904 10.1097/01.rli.0000184756.66360. d3 (Pubitemid 41546838)
32. MC Schabel GR Morrell 2009 Uncertainty in T-1 mapping using the variable flip angle method with two flip angles Phys Med Biol 54 1 N1 N8 19060359 10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/N01
33. MC Schabel DL Parker 2008 Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences Phys Med Biol 53 9 2345 2373 18421121 10.1088/0031-9155/53/9/010 (Pubitemid 351570916)
34. NF Schwenzer I Kotter JC Henes C Schraml J Fritz CD Claussen M Horger 2010 The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis Am J Roentgenol 194 3 715 720 10.2214/AJR.09.2671
35. MA Stephens 1979 Tests of fit for the logistic distribution based on the empirical distribution function Biometrika 66 3 591 595 10.1093/biomet/66.3.591 (Pubitemid 10218409)
36. PS Tofts 1997 Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 7 1 91 101 9039598 10.1002/jmri.1880070113 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7ptFKmsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28365643)
37. PS Tofts G Brix DL Buckley JL Evelhoch E Henderson M Knopp HBW Larsson TY Lee NA Mayr GJM Parker RE Port J Taylor RM Weisskoff 1999 Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T-1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols J Magn Reson Imaging 10 3 223 232 10508281 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<223::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO;2-S 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvjsl2jtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29463104)
38. D Vincensini V Dedieu PA Eliat C Vincent C Bailly J de Certaines F Joffre 2007 Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of vascular permeability and extracellular volume fraction of breast tumors by dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced relaxometry Magn Reson Imaging 25 3 293 302 17371717 10.1016/j.mri.2006.10.016 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjtVagur4%3D (Pubitemid 46420753)
39. C Yang GS Karczmar M Medved A Oto M Zamora WM Stadler 2009 Reproducibility assessment of a multiple reference tissue method for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI analysis Magn Reson Med 61 4 851 859 19185002 10.1002/mrm.21912
40. TE Yankeelov WD Rooney X Li CS Springer 2003 Variation of the relaxographic "shutter-speed" for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape Magn Reson Med 50 6 1151 1169 14648563 10.1002/mrm.10624 (Pubitemid 37494016)
41. S Zwick G Brix P Tofts R Strecker A Kopp-Schneider H Laue W Semmler F Kiessling 2010 Simulation-based comparison of two approaches frequently used for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri Eur Radiol 20 2 432 442 19727758 10.1007/s00330-009-1556-6