Marital satisfaction across three cultures: Does the number of children have an impact after accounting for other marital demographics?

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 340-354

  Wendorf, Craig A ^a   Lucas, Todd ^b   Imamoǧlu, E Olcay ^c   Weisfeld, Carol C ^d   Weisfeld, Glenn E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY   (United States)

Author keywords

children; marital satisfaction; marriage; Turkey; United Kingdom; United States

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953185741     PISSN: 00220221     EISSN: 15525422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022022110362637     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Adams, B.N. (2004). Families and family study in international perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 1076-1088.
2. Amato, P.R. (1993). Children's adjustment to divorce: Theories, hypotheses, and empirical support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 23-38.
3. Argyle, M., & Henderson, M. (1985). The anatomy of relationships. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
4. Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815-824.
5. Belsky, J. (1990). Children and marriage. In F. D. Fincham & T. N. Bradbury (Eds.), The psychology of marriage (pp. 172-200). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
7. Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit on the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
8. Betzig, L.L. (1986). Despotism and differential reproduction: A Darwinian view of history. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
9. Betzig, L.L. (1989). Causes of marital dissolution: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology, 30, 654-676.
10. Booth, A., Carver, K., & Granger, D.A. (2000). Biosocial perspectives on the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1018-1034.
11. Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss; Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
12. Bradbury, T.N., Fincham, F.D., & Beach, S.R.H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.
13. Brislin, R. (2000). Understanding culture's influence on behavior. Orlando, FL: Harcourt-Brace.
14. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Buric, O., & Zacevic, A. (1967). Family authority, marital satisfaction and the social network in Yugoslavia. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 325-336.
16. Buss, D.M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
17. Byrne, B.M., & Campbell, T.L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 555-574.
18. Cherlin, A. (1977). The effect of children on marital dissolution. Demography, 14, 265-272.
19. Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold, R.B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25(1), 1-27.
20. Cowan, P.A., & Cowan, C.P. (1988). Changes in marriage during the transition to parenthood: Must we blame the baby? In G. Y. Michaels & W. A. Goldberg (Eds.), The transition to parenthood: Current theory and research (pp. 114-154). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21. Cox, M.J., Paley, B., Burchinal, M., & Payne, C.C. (1999). Marital perceptions and interactions across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 611-625.
22. Crohan, S.E. (1996). Marital quality and conflict across the transition to parenthood in African American and White couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 933-944.
23. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behavior (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Willard Grant.
24. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
25. Dion, K.K., & Dion, K.L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 53-69.
26. Duben, A. (1985). Turkish families and households in historical perspective. Journal of Family History, 10, 75-97.
27. Ember, M., & Ember, C.R. (1979). Male-female bonding: A cross-species study of mammals and birds. Behavior Science Research, 14, 37-56.
28. Fisher, H. (1992). Anatomy of love: The mysteries of mating, marriage, and why we stray. New York, NY: Random House.
29. Friedl, E. (1975). Women and men: An anthropologist's view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
30. Gable, S., Belsky, J., & Crnic, K. (1995). Coparenting during the child's 2nd year: A descriptive account. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 609-616.
31. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selective essays by Clifford Geertz. New York, NY: Basic Books.
32. Glenn, N.D., & McLanahan, S. (1982). Children and marital happiness: A further specification of the relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 63-72.
33. Goode, W.J. (1993). World changes in divorce patterns. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34. Hackel, L.S., & Ruble, D.N. (1992). Changes in the marital relationships after the first baby is born: Predicting the impact of expectancy disconfirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 944-957.
35. Hazan, C., & Zeifman, D. (1994). Sex and the psychological tether. Advances in Personal Relationships, 5, 151-177.
36. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402.
37. Heyat, F. (2000). Azeri professional women's life strategies in the Soviet context. In F. Acar & A. GüneşAyata (Eds.), Gender and identity construction. Women of Central Asia, the Caucasus and Turkey (pp. 177-201). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
38. Houseknecht, S.K. (1979). Childlessness and marital adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 259-265.
39. Huston, T., McHale, S., & Crouter, A. (1986). When the honeymoon's over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of close relationships (pp. 109-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Imamoǧlu, E.O. (2000). Changing gender roles and marital satisfaction in Turkey. In F. Acar & A. Güneş-Ayata (Eds.), Gender and identity construction. Women of Central Asia, the Caucasus and Turkey (pp. 101-116). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
41. Imamoǧlu, E.O. (2003). Individuation and relatedness: Not opposing but distinct and complementary. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 367-402.
42. Imamoǧlu, E.O. (2004). Family. Modern Islamic discourses: Turkey and the Caucasus. In S. Joseph (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and Islamic cultures, Vol. II: Family, law and politics (pp. 165-166). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
43. Imamoǧlu, E.O. (2006). Aging: Turkey. In S. Joseph (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and Islamic cultures, Vol. III: Family, body, sexuality and health (pp. 13-14). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
44. Imamoǧlu, E.O., & Karakitapoǧlu-Aygün, Z. (2004). Self-construals and values in different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130, 277-306.
45. Imamoǧlu, E.O., & Karakitapoǧlu-Aygün, Z. (2006). Actual, ideal, and expected relatedness with parents across and within cultures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 721-745.
46. Imamoǧlu, E.O., & Karakitapoǧlu-Aygün, Z. (2007). Relatedness of identities and emotional closeness with parents across and within cultures. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 145-161.
47. Imamoǧlu, E.O., Küller, R., Imamoǧlu, V., & Küller, M. (1993). The social psychological worlds of Swedes and Turks in and around retirement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 26-41.
48. Imamoǧlu, E.O., & Yasak, Y. (1997). Dimensions of marital relations as perceived by Turkish husbands and wives. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 211-232.
49. Iwao, S. (1993). The Japanese woman: Traditional image and changing reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Jacobson, P.H. (1959). American marriage and divorce. New York, NY: Rinehart.
51. Jankowiak, W.R., & Fischer, E.F. (1992). A cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology, 31, 149-155.
52. Johnson, D.R., & Booth, A. (1998). Marital quality: A product of the dyadic environment or individual factors? Social Forces, 76, 883-904.
53. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2005). LISREL, Version 8.72. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
54. Karakitapoǧlu-Aygün, Z., & Imamoǧlu, E.O. (2002). Value domains of Turkish adults and university students. The Journal of Psychology, 142, 333-351.
55. Kleiman, D.G. (1977). Monogamy in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52, 39-69.
56. Kurdek, L.A. (1998). Developmental changes in marital satisfaction: A 6-year prospective longitudinal study of newlywed couples. In T.N. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 180-204). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57. Lawrence, E., Nylen, K., & Cobb, R.J. (2007). Prenatal expectations and marital satisfaction over the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 155-164.
58. Lawrence, E., Rothman, A.D., Cobb, R.J., Rothman, M.T., & Bradbury, T.N. (2008). Marital satisfaction across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 41-50.
59. Lucas, T.W., Parkhill, M.R., Wendorf, C.A., Imamoǧlu, E.O., Weisfeld, C.C., Weisfeld, G.E., & Shen, J. (2008). Cultural and evolutionary components of marital satisfaction: A multidimensional assessment of measurement invariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 109-123.
60. Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
61. Money, J., & Ehrhardt, A.A. (1972). Man and woman, boy and girl. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
62. Morgan, S.P., & Rindfuss, R.R. (1985). Marital disruption: Structural and temporal dimensions. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1055-1077.
63. Orithinkal, J., & Vansteenwegen, A. (2007). Do demographics affect marital satisfaction? Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 73-85.
64. Perren, S., Von Wyl, A., Burgin, D., Simoni, H., & Von Klitzing, K. (2005). Intergenerational transmission of marital quality across the transition to parenthood. Family Process, 44, 441-459.
65. Pimentel, E.E. (2000). How do I love thee? Marital relations in urban China. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 32-47.
66. Popenoe, D. (1993). American family decline, 1960-1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 5, 527-555.
67. Prentice, D.A., & Miller, D.T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160-164.
68. Quale, G.R. (1988). A history of marriage systems. New York, NY: Greenwood.
69. Rosenblatt, P.C., & Unangst, D. (1974). Marriage ceremonies: An exploratory cross-cultural study. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 5, 41-56.
70. Rothbaum, F., Pott, M., Azuma, H., Miyake, K., & Weisz, J. (2000). The development of close relationships in Japan and the United States: Paths of symbiotic harmony and generative tension. Child Development, 71, 1121-1142.
71. Russell, R.J.H., & Wells, P.A. (1993). Marriage and relationship questionnaire. Sevenoaks, UK: Hodder & Stoughton.
72. Russell, R.J.H., Wells, P.A., & Imamoǧlu, E.O. (1989). Evlilik anketi [Revised Turkish marriage questionnaire]. Middle East Technical University, unpublished booklet.
73. Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1967). A comparison of power structure and marital satisfaction in urban Greek and French families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 345-352.
74. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. VonEye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399-519). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75. Schmitt, D.P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., ZupanÈiÈ, A. (2004). Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions: Are models of self and other pancultural constructs? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 367-402.
76. Stattin, H., & Klackenberg, G. (1992). Discordant family relations in intact families: Developmental tendencies over 18 years. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 940-956.
77. Stephens, W.N. (1963). The family in cross-cultural perspective. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
78. Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
79. Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D.A., Chen, M.D., & Campbell, A.M. (2005). As good as it gets? A life course perspective on marital quality. Social Forces, 8, 493-511.
80. Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-69.
81. Van Laningham, J., Johnson, D.R., & Amato, P. (2001). Marital happiness, marital duration, and the U-shaped curve: Evidence from a five-wave panel study. Social Forces, 79, 1313-1341.
82. Veroff, J., Douban, E., & Kukla, R.A. (1981). The inner American: A self-portrait from 1957 to 1976. New York: Basic Books.
83. Waite, L.J., & Lillard, L.A. (1991). Children and marital disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 930-953.
84. Wallace, P.M., & Gotlib, I.H. (1990). Marital adjustment during the transition to parenthood: Stability and predictors of change. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 21-29.
85. Weisfeld, G.E., & Weisfeld, C.C. (2002). Marriage: An evolutionary perspective. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23(Suppl. 4), 47-54.
86. Wendorf, C.A. (2002). Comparisons of structural equation modeling and hierarchical linear modeling approaches to couples' data. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 126-140.