Value domains of turkish adults and university students

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 142, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 333-351

  Aygün, Zahide Karakitapoĝlu ^a   Imamoĝlu, E Olcay ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cultural differences; Differentiation integration; Turkish adults; Turkish university students; Value domain; Values

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CULTURAL FACTOR; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL STATUS; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL CONDITIONS; SOCIAL VALUES; TURKEY;

EID: 0036615381     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: 19401183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224540209603903     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Arda, B. (1993). Tip öğrencilerinin meslek seçme motivasyonlan ve değer sistemleri konusunda bir durum değerlendirmesi [A study of medical students' values and motives in their choice of occupation]. In R. Bayraktar & I. Dağ (Eds.), Ulusal psikoloji kon-gresi bilimsel çalişimalari (Vol. 7, pp. 59-64). Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Psychological Association.
2. Bagaran, F. (1992). The university students' value preferences. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih Cografya Fakiiltesi Araftirma Dergisi, 14, 13-25.
3. Bajaran, F. (1993). Üniversite eğitim süresi içinde öğrencilerin değer tercih siralamalannda değişme [Changes in value preferences of students during university education] In R. Bayraktar & I. Dag (Eds.), Ulusal psikoloji kongresi bilimsel çalişmalari (Vol. 7, pp. 49-58). Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Psychological Association.
4. Bond, M. H. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009-1015.
5. Braithwaite, V. A., & Law, H. G. (1985). Structure of human values: Testing the adequacy of the Rokeach value survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 250-263.
6. Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143-164.
7. Clancy, S. M., & Dollinger, S. J. (1993). Photographic depictions of the self: Gender and age differences in social connectedness. Sex Roles, 29, 477-495.
8. Ergüder, U., Esmer, Y., & Kalaycioğlu, E. (1991). Türk toplumunun değerleri [Values of the Turkish society]. Türk Sanayicileri ve I, s adamlari Derneği Raporu (Yayin No. TUSIAD-T/91, G.145). Istanbul, Turkey.
9. Enkson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
10. Erkut, S. (1984). Dualism in values toward education of Turkish women. In Ç.Kağitçibaşi (Ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey (pp. 121-132). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Feather, N. T. (1979). Value correlates of conservatism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1617-1630.
12. Feather, N. T. (1991). Human values, global self-esteem, and belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 59, 83-107.
13. Fiorentine, R. (1988). Increasing similarity in the values and life plans of male and female college students? Evidence and implications. Sex Roles, 18, 143-158.
14. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Göregenli, M. (1995). Kültürümüz açisindan bireycilik-toplulukçuluk eğilimleri: Bir başlangiç çalişmasi [Individualism-collectivism orientations in the Turkish culture: A preliminary study]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 10, 1-14.
16. Göregenli, M. (1997). Individualist and collectivist tendencies in a Turkish sample. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 787-794.
17. Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, I. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism and psychology. American Psychologist, 45, 455-464.
18. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Hui, C. H., & Villareal, M. J. (1989). IC and psychological needs. The relationships in two cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 310-323.
20. Hyde, J. S. (1991). Half the human experience. Lexington, MA: Heath.
21. Hyman, H. H., Payaslioglu, A. & Frey, F. W. (1958). The values of Turkish college youth. Public Opinion Quarterly, 22, 275-291.
22. Imamoğlu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In Ç. Kağitçibaşi (Ed.). Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 138-145). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
23. Imamoğlu, E. O. (1995). Değişim sürecinde aile: Evlilik ilişkileri, bireysel gelişim ve demokratik değerler [Family in the change process: Marital relations, self-development and democratic values]. Aile kurultayi 1994 [Proceedings of the Conference on Family in Turkey, 1994] (pp. 33-51). Ankara, Turkey: Institute for Family Research.
24. Imamoğlu, E. O. (1998). Individualism and collectivism in a model and scale of balanced differentiation and integration. The Journal of Psychology, 132, 95-105.
25. Imamoğlu, E. O., & Imamoglu, V. (1992a). Housing and living environments of the Turkish elderly. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 35-43.
26. Imamoğlu, E. O., & Imamoglu, V. (1992b). Life situations and attitudes of the Turkish elderly toward institutional living within a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, 102-108.
27. Imamoğlu, E. O., & Karakitapoğlu Aygün, Z. (1999). 19701erden 19901ara değerler: Üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen zaman, ku$ak ve cinsiyet farkhhklan [Value preferences from 1970s to 1990s: Cohort, generation and gender differences at a Turkish university]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14, 1-22.
28. Imamoğlu, E. O., & Kiliç, N. (1999). A social psychological comparison of the Turkish elderly residing at high or low quality institutions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 231-242.
29. Imamoğlu, E. O., Kuller, R., Imamoğlu, V., & Küller, M. (1993).The social psychological worlds of Swedes and Turks in and around retirement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 26-41.
30. Imamoğlu, E. O., & Yasak, Y. (1997). Dimensions of marital relations as perceived by Turkish husbands and wives. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs. 123, 211-232.
31. Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1973). Psychological aspects of modernization in Turkey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4, 157-174.
32. Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1984). Sex roles, value of children and fertility in Turkey. In £. Kagit^i-ba§i (Ed). Sex roles, family and community in Turkey (pp. 151-180). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
33. Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1990). Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A model of change. In J. Berman (Ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 135-200). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
34. Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & Ç. Kağitçibaşi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Social behavior and applications (pp. 1-49). Allyn & Bacon.
35. Karadayi, F. (1998). Ilişkili ozerklik: Kavrami, olciilmesi, gelişimi ve toplumsal Onemi, gençlere ve kültüre digit deglerlendirmeler [Related autonomy: Its concept; measurement, development, and societal importance]. Adana, Turkey: Cukurova Universitesi Basimevi.
36. Kashima, Y., Kim, U., Gelfand, M. J., Yamaguchi, K. Y., Choi, S. C., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925-937.
37. Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value orientations in the theory of action. In T. Parsons & E. Skills (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Konrad Adenauer Vakfi (1999). Türk gençliği 98: Suskun kitle büyüteç altinda [Turkish youth 1998: Investigation of the silent population]. Ankara, Turkey: Istanbul, MUlkiyelil-er Vakii Sosyal Ara§itirmalar Merkezi.
39. Lau, S. (1988). The value orientations of Chinese university students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 583-596.
40. Lau, S. (1992). Collectivism's individualism. Value preference, personal control, and the desire for freedom among Chinese. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 361-366.
41. Lau, S., & Wong, A. K. (1992). Value and sex-role orientation of Chinese adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 3-17.
42. LeCompte, W. F., & LeCompte, G. K. (1970). Effects of education and intercultural contact on traditional attitudes in Turkey. The Journal of Social Psychology, 80, 11-21.
43. LeCompte, W. F., & LeCompte, G. K. (1973). Generational attribution in Turkish and American youth: A study of social norms involving the family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4, 175-186.
44. Lykes, M. B. (1985). Gender and individualistic versus collectivist bases for notions about the self. Journal of Personality, S3, 357-383.
45. Mednick, M. (1989). On the politics of psychological constructs: Stop the bandwagon, I want to get off. American Psychologist, 44, 1118-1123.
46. Mishra, R. C. (1994). Individualist and collectivist orientations across generations. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kağitçibaşi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 225-238). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
47. Phalet, K., & Claeys, W. (1993). A comparative study of Turkish and Belgian youth. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 319-343.
48. Prince-Gibson, E., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Value priorities and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 49-67.
49. Realo, A., Allik, J., & Vadi, M. (1997). The hierarchical structure of collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 93-116.
50. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
51. Şahin, N., & Şahin, N. H. (1995). Dimensions of concerns: The case of Turkish adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 49-69.
52. Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139-157.
53. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
54. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
55. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a universal theory of the content and structure of values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.
56. Simmons D. D., & Penn, J. R. (1994). Stability and sharing of value norms among American university student cohorts in 1970, 1980, and 1990. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 69-78.
57. Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In U. Kim, H. C., Triandis, Ç. Kağitçibaşi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 123-136). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
58. Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 231-264.
59. Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-in-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
60. Unger, R. K., & Crawford, M. (1996). Women and gender (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
61. Wojciszke, B. (1997). Parallels between competence versus morality-related traits and individualistic versus collectivistic values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 245-256.