Dimensions of marital relationships as perceived by Turkish husbands and wives

Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 211-232

  Imamoglu, E Olcay ^a   Yasak, Yeşim ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CULTURAL FACTOR; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SATISFACTION; STATISTICS; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); URBAN POPULATION;

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TURKEY; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 0031138216     PISSN: 87567547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Atalay, B., Kontaş, Y. M., Beyazìt, S., & Madenoǧlu, K. (1993). Türk aile yapìsì arastìrmasì [Investigation of Turkish family structure]. Issued by the National Planning Organization, Social Planning Research Unit, Publication number: DPT: 2313-SPGM: 421). Ankara: DPT Matbaasì.
2. Bailey, K. D. (1987). Methods of social research. New York: Free Press.
3. Blood, R. O., Jr., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.
4. Buric, O., & Zecevic, A. (1967). Family authority, marital satisfaction and the social network in Yugoslavia. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 325-336.
5. Di Leonardo, M. (1987). The female world of cards and holidays: Women, families and the work of kinship. Signs, 12, 440-453.
6. Fox, G. L. (1973). Some determinants of modernism among women in Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Marriage and The Family, 35, 520-529.
7. Fox, G. L. (1975). Love match and arranged marriage in a modernizing nation: Mate selection in Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 180-193.
8. Gerstel, N. (1988). Divorce and kin ties: The importance of gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 209-219.
9. Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 187-220). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Imamoǧlu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In Ç. Kaǧìtçìbasì (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 138-145). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
11. Imamoǧlu, E. O. (1993). Degişen dünyada degişen aile-içi roller [Changing family roles within a changing world]. Kadìn Araştìrmalarì Dergisi, 1, 58-68.
12. Imamoǧlu, E. O. (1994). A model of gender relations in the Turkish family. Bogaziçi Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, 8, 165-176.
13. Imamoǧlu, E. O. (1995). American students' expectations about relationships involving common/conflicting interests and equal/unequal power. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 121(4), 391-409.
14. Imamoǧlu, E. O., & Imamoǧlu, V. (1992a). Housing and living environments of the Turkish elderly. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 1-9.
15. Imamoǧlu, E. O., & Imamoǧlu, V. (1992b). Life situations and attitudes of the Turkish elderly toward institutional living within a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, 102-108.
16. Imamoǧlu, E. O., Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, P. A. (1994). The Marriage and Relationship Questionnaire (MARQ): A comparison of Turkish and British marriages. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, 2, 50.
17. Lerner, D. F. (1958). The passing of traditional society. Glencoe, NY: Free Press.
18. Lewin, K. (1948). The background of conflict in marriage. In G. W. Lewin & G. W. All-port (Eds.). Resolving social conflict: Selected papers on group dynamics by Kurt Lewin (pp. 84-102). New York: Harper and Brothers.
19. Magnarella, P. J. (1972). Aspects of kinship change in a modernizing Turkish town. Human Organization, 31, 361-371.
20. Pinto, R. P., & Hollandsworth, J. G., Jr. (1984). A measure of possessiveness in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2, 273-279.
21. Rodman, H. (1972). Marital power and the theory of resources in cultural context. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 3, 50-69.
22. Rosenthal, C. (1985). Kinkeeping in the familial division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 965-974.
23. Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, P. A. (1986). Marriage Questionnaire. Unpublished booklet.
24. Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, P. A. (1993). Marriage and Relationship Questionnaire: MARQ handbook. Kent, UK: Hodder and Stoughton.
25. Russell, R. J. H., Wells, P. A., & Imamoǧlu, E. O. (1989). Evlilik Anketi [Revised Turkish Marriage Questionnaire]. Unpublished booklet.
26. Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1967). A comparison of power structure and marital satisfaction in urban Greek and French families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 345-352.
27. Timur, S. (1972). Türkiye'de aile yapìsì [Family structure in Turkey], Ankara: Hacettepe University Publications.
28. Xiaohe, X., & Whyte, M. K. (1990). Love matches and arranged marriages: A Chinese replication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 709-722.