Alien species in the Finnish weed flora

Agricultural and Food Science

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 86-95

  Hyvönen, Terho ^a   Jalli, Heikki ^a  

^a PLANT PRODUCTION RESEARCH   (Finland)

Author keywords

Climate change; Finland; Invasive species; Weed management

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953145708     PISSN: 14596067     EISSN: 17951895     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2137/145960611795163079     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Andreasen, C. & Stryhn, H. 2008. Increasing weed flora in Danish arable fields and its importance for biodiversity. Weed Research 48: 1-9.
2. Andreasen, C. & Skovgaard, I.B.M. 2009. Crop and soil factors of importance for the distribution of plant species on arable fields in Denmark. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 133: 61-67.
3. Bradley, B.A., Blumenthal, D.M., Wilcove, D.S. & Ziska, L.H. 2010. Predicting plant invasions in an era of global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 310-318.
4. Chytrý, M., Maskell, L., Pino, J., Pyšek, P., Vila, M., Font, X. & Smart S. 2008. Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison between Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 448-458.
5. Chytrý, M., Pyšek, P., Wild, J., Pino, J., Maskell, L.C. & Vilà, M. 2009. European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. Diversity and Distributions 15: 98-107.
6. Colautti, R.I., Grigorovich, I. A. & MacIsaac, H.J., 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biological Invasions 8: 1023-1037.
7. DAISIE 2009. Handbook of alien species in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer. 399 p.
8. Davis, M.A., Grime, P. & Thompson, K., 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88: 528-534.
9. Dukes, J.S. & Mooney, H.A. 1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 135-139.
10. Essl, F., Dullinger, S. & Kleinbauer, I. 2009. Changes in the spatio-temporal patterns and habitat preferences of Ambrosia artemisiifolia during its invasion of Austria. Preslia 81: 119-133.
11. Forcella, F. 1985. Final distribution is related to rate of spread in alien weeds. Weed Research 25: 181-191.
12. Glemnitz, M., Radics, L., Hoffmann, J. & Czimber, G. 2006. Weed species richness and species composition of different arable field types-A comparative analysis along a climate gradient from south to north Europe. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, Sonderheft XX: 577-586.
13. Grytnes, J. A., Birks, H. J. B. & Peglar, S. M. 1999. Plant species richness in Fennoscandia: evaluating the relative importance of climate and history. Nordic Journal of Botany 19: 489-503.
14. Hanski, I. 1982. Distributional ecology of anthropochorous plants in villages surrounded by forest. Annales Botanici Fennici 19: 1-15.
15. Häfliger, E. & Hildemar, S. 1980. Grass weeds 1. Weeds of the subfamily Panicoideae. CIBA-GEIGY Ltd., Basle, Switzerland. 142 p.
16. Häfliger, E. & Hildemar, S. 1981. Grass weeds 2. Weeds of the subfamilies Chloridoideae, Pooideae, Oryzoideae. CIBA-GEIGY Ltd., Basle, Switzerland. 137 p.
17. Häfliger, E., Kühn, U., Hämet-Ahti, L., Cook, C.D.K., Faden, R. & Speta, F. 1982. Monocot weeds 3. Monocot weeds excluding grasses. CIBA-GEIGY Ltd., Basle, Switzerland. 132 p.
18. Hämet-Ahti, L., Suominen, J., Ulvinen, T. & Uotila, P. (eds.) 1998. Retkeilykasvio (Field Flora of Finland). Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museum, Helsinki, Finland. 656 p. (In Finnish)
19. Hanf, M. 1983. The arable weeds of Europe with their seedlings and seeds. BASF Aktiengeselleschaft, Ludwigshafen, Germany. 494 p.
20. Hellmann, J.J., Byers, J.E., Bierwagen, B.G. & Dukes, J.S. 2008. Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conservation Biology 22: 534-543.
21. Hobbs, R.J. & Huenneke, L.F., 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion. Implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6: 324-337.
22. Jauni, M. & Hyvönen, T. 2010. Invasion level of alien plants in semi-natural agricultural habitats in boreal region. Ag riculture, Ecosystems and Environment 138: 109-115.
23. Jylhä, K., Tuomenvirta, H. & Ruosteenoja, K. 2004. Climate change projections for Finland during the 21st century. Boreal Environmental Research 9: 127-152.
24. Kiss, L. & Béres, I. 2006. Anthropogenic factors behind the recent population expansion of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) in Eastern Europe: is there a correlation with political transitions? Journal of Biogeography 33: 2156-2157.
25. Lambdon, P. W., Pyšek, P., Basnou, C., Hejda, M., Arianoutsou, M., Essl, F., Jarošík, V., Pergl, J., Winter, M., Anastasiu, P., Andriopoulos, P., Bazos, I., Brundu, G., Celesti-Grapow, L., Chassot, P., Delipetrou, P., Josefsson, M., Kark, S., Klotz, S., Kokkoris, Y., Kühn, I., Marchante, H., Perglová, I., Pino, J., Vila, M., Zikos, A., Roy, D. & Hulme, P. 2008. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80: 101-149.
26. Lampinen, R. & Lahti, T. 2009. Kasviatlas 2008.-Helsingin Yliopisto, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Kasvimuseo, Helsinki. Levinneisyyskartat osoitteessa http://www.luomus.fi/kasviatlas. (In Finnish)
27. Lockwood, J.L., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T., 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 223-228.
28. Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Evans, H., Clout, M. & Bazzaz, F.A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10: 689-710.
29. Milberg, P. & Andersson, L. 2006. Evaluating the potential northward spread of two grass weeds in Sweden. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science 56: 91-95.
30. NOBANIS, 2009. North European and Baltic network on invasive alien species. (http://www.nobanis.org)
31. Patterson, D.T. 1995. Weeds in changing climate. Weed Science 43: 685-701.
32. Peltonen-Sainio, P., Jauhiainen, L., Hakala, K. & Ojanen, H. 2009. Climate change and prolongation of growing season: changes in regional potential for field crop production in Finland. Agricultural and Food Science 18: 171-190.
33. Pheloung, P.C., Williams, P.A. & Halloy, S.R. 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management 57: 239-251.
34. Pyšek, P., Cock, M.J.W., Nentwig, W. & Ravn, H.P. 2007. Master of all traits: Can we successfully fight giant hogweed? In: Pyšek P., Cock M.J.W., Nentwig W. & Ravn H.P. (eds.). Ecology and Management of Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum), CAB International, p. 297-312.
35. Pyšek, P. & Jarošík, V. 2005. Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants. In: Inderjit, S. (ed.). Invasive plants: Ecological and Agricultural Aspects. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag. p. 77-96.
36. Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V., Chytrý, M., Kropáč, Z., Tichý, L. & Wild, J. 2005. Alien plants in temperate weed communities: Prehistoric and recent invaders occupy different habitats. Ecology 86: 772-785.
37. Pyšek, P., Lambdon, P.W., Arianoutsou, M., Kühn, I., Pino, J. & Winter, M. 2009. Alien vascular plants in Europe. In: DAISIE 2008. Handbook of alien species in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 43-61.
38. Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D.M. 2006. The biogeography of naturalization in alien plants. Journal of Biogeography 33: 2040-2050.
39. Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D.M. 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: Where do we stand? In: Nentwig, W. (ed.). Biological Invasions. Ecological Studies, Vol. 193. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. p. 97-126.
40. Rejmánek, M., Richardson D.M. & Pyšek, P. 2005. Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. In: van der Maarel. E. (ed.). Vegetation Ecology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd. p. 332-355.
41. Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M.G., Panetta, F.D. & West, C.J. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity & Distributions 6: 93-107.
42. Salonen, J., Hyvönen, T. & Jalli, H. 2001. Weeds in spring cereal fields in Finland-a third survey. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 10: 347-364.
43. Sætersdal, M., Birks, H.J.B. & Peglar, S.M. 1998. Predicting changes in Fennoscandian vascular-plant richness as a result of future climatic change. Journal of Biogeography 25: 111-122.
44. Sax, D.F. 2001. Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species: implications for biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 28: 139-150.
45. Schroeder, D., Mueller-Schaerer, H. & Stinson, C.S.A. 1993. A European weed survey in 10 major crop systems to identify targets for biological control. Weed Research 33: 449-458.
46. Simberloff, D. 2009. We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects. Biological Invasions 11: 149-157.
47. Thompson, K., Hodgson, J.G. & Rich, T.C.G. 1995. Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? Ecography 18: 390-402.
48. Vilá, M., Corbin, J.D., Dukes, J.S., Pino, J. & Smith, S.D. 2007. Linking plant invasions to global environmental change. In: Canadell, J., Pataki, D. & Pitelka, L. (eds.) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world. Springer. New York.
49. Walther, G-R., Roques, A., Hulme, P.E., Sykes, M.T., Pysèk, P., Kühn, I., Zobel, M., Bacher, S., Botta-Dukát, Z., Bugmann, H., Czúcz, B., Dauber, J., Hickler, T., Jarošik, V., Kenis, M., Klotz, S., Minchin, D., Moora, M., Nentwig, W., Ott, J., Panov, V.E., Reineking, B., Robinet, C., Semenchenko, V., Solarz, W., Thuiller, W., Vilà, M., Vohland, K. & Settele, J. 2009. Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 686-693.
50. Williams, G.H. 1982. Elsevier's dictionary of weeds of Western Europe. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam. The Netherlands. 320 p.
51. Williams, G.H. & Hunyadi, K. 1987. Dictionary of weeds of Eastern Europe. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam. The Netherlands. 480 p.
52. Williamson, M., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Kühn, I., Hill, M., Klotz, S., Milbau, A., Stout, J. & Pyšek, P. 2009. The distribution of range sizes of native and alien plants in four European countries and the effects of residence time. Diversity and Distributions 15: 158-166.