Invasion level of alien plants in semi-natural agricultural habitats in boreal region

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 138, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 109-115

  Jauni, Miia ^a   Hyvönen, Terho ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b PLANT PRODUCTION RESEARCH   (Finland)

Author keywords

Archaeophyte; Generalized linear mixed models; Habitat type; Mowing; Neophyte; Plant invasions

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; BOREAL FOREST; DISTURBANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; GRASSLAND; HABITAT TYPE; INVASIVE SPECIES; LINEARITY; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; MOWING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PLANT COMMUNITY; SEVENTEENTH CENTURY; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SPECIES RICHNESS; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

EID: 77954860173     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ahti T., Hämet-Ahti L., Jalas J. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 1968, 5:169-211.
2. Chytrý M., Pyšek P., Tichý L., Knollová I., Danihelka J. Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitative assessment across habitats. Preslia 2005, 77:339-354.
3. Chytrý M., Jarošik V., Pyšek P., Hájek O., Knollová I., Tichý L., Danihelka J. Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology 2008, 89:1541-1553.
4. Chytrý M., Maskell L.C., Pino J., Pyšek P., Vilá M., Font X., Smart S.M. Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:448-458.
5. Chytrý M., Pyšek P., Wild J., Pino J., Maskell L.C., Vilà M. European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15:98-107.
6. Colautti R.I., Grigorovich I.A., MacIsaac H.J. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 2006, 8:1023-1037.
7. Cole D.E., King J.R., Oyarzun D.A., Dietzler T.H., McClay S. Experiences with invasive plant management and ecology in Alberta. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2007, 87:1013-1022.
8. Cousins S.A.O., Eriksson O. The influence of management history and habitat on plant species richness in the rural hemiboreal landscape, Sweden. Landsc. Ecol. 2002, 17:517-529.
9. Dajdok Z., Wuczyński A. Alien plants in field margins and fields of south-western Poland. Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 2008, 9-10:19-33.
10. Davis M.A., Grime P., Thompson K. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 2000, 88:528-534.
11. Dukes J.S. Species composition and diversity affect grassland susceptibility and response to invasion. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12:602-617.
12. Eriksson O., Wikström S., Eriksson Å., Lindborg R. Species-rich Scandinavian grasslands are inherently open to invasion. Biol. Invasions 2006, 8:355-363.
13. Foster B.L., Smith V.H., Dickson T.L., Hildebrand T. Invasibility and compositional stability in grassland community: relationships to diversity and extrinsic factors. Oikos 2002, 99:300-307.
14. Gassó N., Sol D., Pino J., Dana E.D., Lloret F., Sanz-Elorza M., Sobrino E., Vilá M. Exploring species attributes and site characteristics to assess plant invasions in Spain. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15:50-58.
15. Grytnes J.A., Birks H.J.B., Peglar S.M. Plant species richness in Fennoscandia: evaluating the relative importance of climate and history. Nord. J. Bot. 1999, 19:489-503.
16. Retkeilykasvio (Field Flora of Finland) 1998, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museum, Helsinki. fourth ed. L. Hämet-Ahti, J. Suominen, T. Ulvinen, P. Uotila (Eds.).
17. Hansen M.J., Clevenger A.P. The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 125:249-259.
18. Hierro J.L., Maron J.L., Callaway R.M. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J. Ecol. 2005, 93:5-15.
19. Hobbs R.J., Huenneke L.F. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion. Implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 1992, 6:324-337.
20. Hovd H., Skogen A. Plant species in arable field margins and road verges of central Norway. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 110:257-265.
21. Jauni, M., Helenius, J., 2008. Putkilokasvien monimuotoisuus maatalousalueilla 2001-2006. In: Kuussaari, M., Heliölä, J., Tiainen, J., Helenius, J. (Eds.), Significance of the Finnish Agri-environment Support Scheme for Biodiversity and Landscape: Final Report 2000-2006. Finn. Environ. 4, 23-49.
22. Kent M., Coker P. Vegetation Description and Analysis, a Practical Approach 1992, Belhaven Press, London.
23. Kivinen S., Luoto M., Kuussaari M., Helenius J. Multi-species richness of boreal agricultural landscapes: effect of climate, biotope, soil and geographical location. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:862-875.
24. Klingenstein, F., Diwani, T., 2005. Invasive alien species from a nature conservation point of view in Germany. In: IPPC Secretariat (Ed.), Identification of Risks and Management of Invasive Alien Species Using the IPPC Framework. Proceedings of the Workshop on Invasive Alien Species and the International Plant Protection Convention, Braumschweg, Germany, 22-26 September 2003. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 137-145.
25. Kuussaari, M., Heliölä, J., Tiainen, J., Helenius, J. (Eds.), 2008. Significance of the Finnish Agri-environment Support Scheme for Biodiversity and Landscape: Final Report 2000-2006. Finn. Environ. 4, 1-208.
26. Kuussaari M., Heliölä J., Luoto M. Farmland biodiversity indicators and monitoring in Finland. Developments in Strategic Landscape Monitoring for the Nordic Countries, 2004, 29-40. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen. G. Groom (Ed.).
27. Legendre P. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm?. Ecology 1993, 74:1659-1673.
28. Legendre P., Legendre L. Numerical Ecology 1998, Elsevier, Amsterdam. second ed.
29. ® for Mixed Models 2006, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. second ed.
30. Lockwood J.L., Cassey P., Blackburn T. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:223-228.
31. Lonsdale W.M. Global patterns of plant invasions ant the concept of invasibility. Ecology 1999, 80:1522-1536.
32. Lososová Z., Chytry M., Cimalová Š., Kropác Z., Otýpcová Z., Pyšek P., Tichý L. Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: gradients of diversity and species composition. J. Veg. Sci. 2004, 15:415-422.
33. Luoto M. Spatial analysis of landscape ecological characteristics of five agricultural areas in Finland by GIS. Fennia 2000, 178:15-54.
34. Maskell L.C., Firbank L.G., Thompson K., Bullock M., Smart S.M. Interactions between non-native plant species and the floristic composition of common habitats. J. Ecol. 2006, 94:1052-1060.
35. Milbau A., Nijs I. The role of species traits (invasiveness) and ecosystem characteristics (invasibility) in grassland invasions: a framework. Weed Technol. 2004, 18:1301-1304.
36. NOBANIS, 2009. North European and Baltic network on invasive alien species. Available from: http://www.nobanis.org/.
37. Pyšek P., Richardson D.M., Rejmánek M., Grady L.W., Williamson M., Kirscher J. Alien plant in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 2004, 53:131-143.
38. Pyšek P., Jarošik V. Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants. Invasive Plants: Ecological and Agricultural Aspects 2005, 77-96. Birkhäuser Verlag, Switzerland. Inderjit (Ed.).
39. Pyšek P., Jarošik V., Chytry M., Kropáč Z., Tichý L., Wild J. Alien plants in temperate weed communities: prehistoric and recent occupy different habitats. Ecology 2005, 86:772-785.
40. Pyšek P., Lambdon P.W., Arianoutsou M., Kühn I., Pino J., Winter M. Alien vascular plants of Europe. Handbook of Alien Species in Europe 2009, 43-61. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. DAISIE (Ed.).
41. Raatikainen K.M., Heikkinen R.K., Pykälä J. Impacts of local and regional factors on vegetation of boreal semi-natural grasslands. Plant Ecol. 2007, 189:155-173.
42. Rejmánek M. Invasibility of plant communities. Biological Invasions, a Global Perspective, Scope 37 1989, 369-388. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. J.A. Drake, H.A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R.H. Groves, F.J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, M. Williamson (Eds.).
43. Richardson D.M., Pyšek P., Rejmánek M., Barbour M.G., Panetta F.D., West C.J. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 2000, 6:93-107.
44. Šerá B. Road vegetation in Central Europe-an example from the Czech Republic. Biology 2008, 63:1085-1088.
45. Simonová D., Lososová Z. Which factors determine plant invasions in man-made habitats in the Czech Republic?. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008, 10:89-100.
46. 4-dominated grassland: invasibility, disturbance and community structure. Oecologia 1999, 120:605-612.
47. Söderström B., Svensson B., Vessby K., Glimskär A. Plant, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodiv. Conserv. 2001, 10:1839-1863.
48. Stohlgren T.J., Chong G.W., Schell L.D., Rimar K.A., Otsuki Y., Lee M., Kalkhan M.A., Villa C.A. Assessing vulnerability to invasion by non-native plant species at multiple spatial scales. Environ. Manage. 2002, 29:566-577.
49. Suominen J., Hämet-Ahti L. Archaeophytes in the flora of Finland. Norrlinia 1993, 4:1-90.
50. The Convention on Biological Diversity COP6, Decision VI/23. Alien Species that Threaten Ecosystems, Habitats or Species 2002.
51. Valtonen A., Jantunen J., Saarinen K. Flora and lepidoptera fauna adversely affected by invasive Lupinus polyphyllus along road verges. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 133:389-396.
52. Ver Hoef J.M., Boveng P.L. Quasi-Poisson vs. negative binomial regression: how should we model overdispersed count data?. Ecology 2007, 88:2766-2772.
53. Vilà M., Pino J., Font X. Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types. J. Veg. Sci. 2007, 18:35-42.