Weeds in spring cereal fields in Finland - A third survey

Agricultural and Food Science in Finland

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 347-364

  Salonen, Jukka ^a   Hyvönen, Terho ^a   Jalli, Heikki ^a  

^a PLANT PRODUCTION RESEARCH   (Finland)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Cereals; Crop protection; Organic farming; Weeds

Indexed keywords

ELYMUS; ELYMUS REPENS; STELLARIA; STELLARIA MEDIA; VIOLA ARVENSIS; VIOLACEAE;

EID: 0035528643     PISSN: 12390992     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.23986/afsci.5705     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Alatalo, R.V. 1981. Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology. Oikos 37: 199-204.
2. th EWRS Symposium, Budapest. p. 41-48.
3. Andreasen, C., Streibig, J.C. & Haas, H. 1991. Soil properties affecting the weed distribution of 37 weed species in Danish fields. Weed Research 31: 181-187.
4. -, Stryhn, H. &Streibig. J.C. 1996. Decline of the flora in Danish arable fields. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 619-626.
5. Bàrberi, P., Silvestri, N. & Bonari, E. 1997. Weed communities of winter wheat as influenced by input level and rotation. Weed Research 37: 301-313.
6. nd ed. BAYER AG, Leverkusen. 1682 p.
7. Becker, B. & Hurle, K. 1998. Unkrautflora auf Feldern mit unterschiedlich langer ökologischer Bewirtschaftung. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, Sonderheft XVI: 155-161.
8. Chancellor, R.J. & Froud-Williams, R.J. 1984. A second survey of cereal weeds in central southern England. Weed Research 24: 29-36.
9. Doucet, C., Weaver, S.E., Hamill, A.S. & Zhang, J. 1999. Separating the effects of crop rotation from weed management on weed density and diversity. Weed Science 47: 729-735.
10. Elonen, P. 1983. Plant production research in Finland. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 22: 258-263.
11. Erviö, L.-R. & Salonen, J. 1987. Changes in the weed population of spring cereals in Finland. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 26: 210-226.
12. Erviö, R., Hyvärinen, S., Erviö, L.-R. & Salonen, J. 1994. Soil properties affecting weed distribution in spring cereal and vegetable fields. Agricultural Science in Finland 3: 497-504.
13. Haas, H. & Streibig, J.C. 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. In: LeBaron, H.M. & Gressel, J. (eds.). Herbicide resistance in plants. J. Wiley & Sons. p. 57-79.
14. Hald, A.B. 1999. Weed vegetation (wild flora) of long established organic versus conventional cereal fields in Denmark. Annals of Applied Biology 14: 307-314.
15. Hämet-Ahti, L., Suominen, J., Ulvinen, T. & Uotila, P. 1998. Retkeilykasvio (Field Flora of Finland). Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museum. Helsinki. 656 p.
16. Heck, K.L.J., van Belle, G. & Simberloff, D. 1975. Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology 56: 1459-1461.
17. Hynninen, E.-L. & Blomqvist, H. 1997. Pesticide sales continue to slide as planned. Kemia - Kemi 24: 514-517.
18. Hyvönen, T. & Salonen, J. 2002. Weed species diversity and community composition in cropping practices at two intensity levels - a six-year experiment. Plant Ecology (in press).
19. Jaccard, P. 1912. The distribution of the flora of the alpine zone. New Phytologist 11: 37-50.
20. Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological Methodology. Second Edition. Benjamin/Cummins, California. 620 p.
21. Légère, A. & Derksen, D.A. 2000. Is diversity a useful concept for weed management. Proceedings of the XIth International Conference on Weeds. Dijon, France. p. 407-414.
22. Londesborough, S., Hynninen, E.-L. & Blomqvist, H. 2000. Pesticide sales in Finland in 1999. Kemia - Kemi 27: 492-494.
23. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 1999. Agriculture in Finland. 35 p.
24. Mukula, J. 1974. Weed competition in spring cereals in Finland. Forskning och forsøk : landbruket 25: 585-592.
25. -, Raatikainen, M., Lallukka, R. & Raatikainen, T. 1969. Composition of weed flora in spring cereals in Finland. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 8: 59-109.
26. -& Rantanen, O. 1987. Climatic risks to the yield and quality of field crops in Finland. I. Basic facts about Finnish field crops production. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 26: 1-18.
27. Raatikainen, M. & Raatikainen, T. 1975. Heinänurmien sato, kasvilajikoostumus ja sen muutokset. Summary: Yield, composition and dynamics of flora in grassland for hay in Finland. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 14: 57-191.
28. Rydberg, N.T. & Milberg, P. 2000. A survey of weeds in organic farming in Sweden. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 18: 175-185.
29. Salonen, J. 1993. Weed infestation and factors affecting weed incidence in spring cereals in Finland - a multi-variate approach. Agricultural Science in Finland 2: 525-536.
30. Sutcliffe, O.L. & Kay, Q.O.N. 2000. Changes in the arable flora of central southern England since the 1960s. Biological Conservation 93: 1-8.
31. Tóth, Á., Benécs-Bárdi, G. & Balzás, G. 1999. Results of national weed surveys in arable land during the past 50 years in Hungary. Proceedings The 1999 Brighton Conference - Weeds. Brighton, UK. p. 805-810.
32. Walls, M., Vieno, M. & Peltola, E. (eds.). 1999. The Finnish Biodiversity Research Programme FIBRE. From species to society - the many faces of biodiversity. 1997-1999 Progress report. Publications of the Academy of Finland 6/99. 95 p.