Associations between asymmetry and human attractiveness: Possible direct effects of asymmetry and signatures of publication bias

Annals of Human Biology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 317-323

  Van Dongen, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

attractiveness; developmental instability; Fluctuating asymmetry; human; repeatability; sexual behaviour; simulation

Indexed keywords

FITNESS; FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY; HONEST SIGNALING; META-ANALYSIS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ESTHETICS; FACE ASYMMETRY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PUBLISHING; SAMPLE SIZE;

BEAUTY; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PUBLICATION BIAS; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 79953118831     PISSN: 03014460     EISSN: 14645033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03014460.2010.544676     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Baker RR. 1997. Copulation, masturbation, and infidelity: State-of-theart. In: Smith A, Atzwanger K, Grammar K, Schafer K, editors. New aspects of human ethology. New York: Springer. p 163-188.
2. Brown WM, Price ME, Kang JS, Pound N, Zhou Y, Yu H. 2008. Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:12938-12943.
3. Clarke GM. 2003. Developmental stability - fitness relationships in animals: some theoretical considerations. In: Polak M, editor. Developmental instability: causes and consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Danel D, Pawlowski B. 2007. Eye-mouth-eye angle as a good indicator of face masculinization, asymmetry, and attractiveness (Homo sapiens). J Cogn Psychol 121:221-225.
5. Duval S, Tweedie R. 2000. A non-parametric "Trim and Fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 95: 89-98.
6. Fink B, Grammer K, Thornhill R. 2001. Human (Homo sapies) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. J Compar Psychol 115:92-99. (Pubitemid 33603305)
7. Fink B, Neave N, Manning JT, Grammer K. 2006. Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality. Personality Individual Diff 41:491-499. (Pubitemid 44011295)
8. Furlow B, Gangestad SW, Armijo-Prewitt T. 1998. Fluctuating asymmetry and human violence. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1-6.
9. Gangestad SW, Bennett KL, Thornhill R. 2001. A latent variable model of developmental instability in relation to men's sexual behaviour. Proc R Soc London B 1477:1677-1684. (Pubitemid 32758604)
10. Gangestad SW,Merriman LA, Emery Thompson M, Unpublished data. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1997. The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evol Human Behav 18:69-88. (Pubitemid 127165576)
11. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1998. Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:927-933. (Pubitemid 28248069)
12. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1999. Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: a model and its implications. J Evol Biol 12:402-416. (Pubitemid 29291690)
13. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Garver-Apgar CE. 2005. Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proc R Soc Lond B 272: 2023-2027. (Pubitemid 41416036)
14. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Garver-Apgar CE, Unpublished data. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Yeo R. 1994. Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethol Sociobiol 15:73-85.
15. Garver-Apgar CE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Miller RD, Olp J. 2006. MHC alleles, sexually responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychol Sci 17:830-835. (Pubitemid 44715250)
16. Grammer K, Thornhill R. 1994. Human (homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Compar Psychol 108:233-242.
17. Haufe C. 2008. Sexual selection and mate choice in evolutionary psychology. Biol Philos 23:115-128. (Pubitemid 350162611)
18. Honnekopp J, Bartholomé T, Jansen G. 2004. Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and physical fitness in young women. Human Nature 15: 147-167. (Pubitemid 38919431)
19. Houle D. 1997. Comment on 'a meta-analysis of the heritability of developmental stability' by Møller and Thornhill. J Evol Biol 10: 17-20.
20. Houle D. 2000. A simple model of the relationship between asymmetry and developmental stability. J Evol Biol 13:720-730. (Pubitemid 30466924)
21. Hughes SM, Harrison MA, Gallup GG. 2002. The sound of symmetry: voice as a marker of developmental instability. Evol Human Behav 23:173-180. (Pubitemid 34451878)
22. Hume DK, Montgomerie R. 2001. Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of "quality" in women and men. Evol Hum Behav 22: 93-112. (Pubitemid 33619687)
23. Jennions MD, Møller AP. 2001. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method. Biol Rev 77:211-222. (Pubitemid 34563825)
24. Jennions MD, Møller AP. 2002. Relationships fade with time: a metaanalysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution. Proc R Soc London B 269:43-48. (Pubitemid 34117342)
25. Jones BC, Little AC, Penton-Voak IS, Tiddeman BP, Burt DM, Perrett DI. 2001. Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: support for a 'good genes' explanation of the attractiveness- symmetry relationship. Evol Human Behav 22:417-429. (Pubitemid 33619697)
26. Klingenberg CP. 2003. A developmental perspective on developmental instability: theory, models, and mechanisms. In: Polak M, editor. Developmental instability: causes and consequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press
27. Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S. 2009. Averageness of symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness? Acta Psychol 131: 136-142.
28. Kowner R. 1996. Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 22:662-675. (Pubitemid 126418416)
29. Little AC, Jones BC, Waitt C, Tiddeman BP, Feinberg DR, Perrett DI, Apicella CL, Marlowe FW. 2008. Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: Data across culture and species. PLoS One 3: e2106.
30. Møller AP. 1997. Developmental stability and fitness: a review. Am Nat 149:916-932.
31. Møller AP, Thornhill R. 1998. Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis. Am Nat 151:174-192. (Pubitemid 28102155)
32. Møller AP, Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 2005. Direct and indirect tests for publication bias: asymmetry and sexual selection. Anim Beh 70: 497-506. (Pubitemid 43293130)
33. Palmer AR. 1999. Detecting publication bias in meta-analyses: a case study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Am Nat 154: 220-233. (Pubitemid 29427391)
34. Penton-Voak IS, Jones BC, Little AC, Baker S, Tiddeman B, Burt DM, Perrett DI. 2001. Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions, and male facial attractiveness. Proc R Soc B 268: 1617-1623. (Pubitemid 32730418)
35. Rhodes G, Simmons LW, Peters M. 2005. Attractiveness and sexual behavior: does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evol Human Behav 26:186-201. (Pubitemid 40317010)
36. Rikowski A, Grammer K. 1999. Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proc R Soc B 266:869-874. (Pubitemid 29237677)
37. Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1999. Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and cues of good genes. Proc R Soc B 266:1913-1917. (Pubitemid 29457076)
38. Shackleford TK, Larsen RJ. 1997. Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. J Pers Soc Psychol 72:456-466. (Pubitemid 127454489)
39. Simmons LW, Rhoades G, Peters M, Koehler N. 2004. Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability? Behav Ecol 15:864-871. (Pubitemid 39147452)
40. Simpson JA, Gangestad SW, Christensen PN, Leck K. 1999. Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. J Pers Soc Psychol 76:159-172.
41. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry and human sexual behavior. Psychol Sci 5:297-302.
42. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 1999. The scent of symmetry: a human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evol Human Behav 20:175-201. (Pubitemid 129516490)
43. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 2006. Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evol Human Behav 27:131-144. (Pubitemid 43246352)
44. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW, Miller R, Scheyd G, McCollough J, Franklin M. 2003. MHC, symmetry and body scent attractiveness in men and women (Homo sapiens). Behav Ecol 14:668-678. (Pubitemid 37274410)
45. Thornhill R, Møller AP, Gangestad SW. 1999. The biological significance of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection: a reply to Palmer. Am Nat 154:234-241. (Pubitemid 29427392)
46. Tovée MJ, Tasker K, Benson PJ. 2000. Is symmetry a visual cue to attractiveness in the human female body? Evol Hum Behav 21: 191-200.
47. Trivers R, Palestis BG, Zaatari D. 2009. Anatomy of a fraud: Symmetry and dance. Antioch, CA: TPZ Publishers.
48. Van Dongen S. 1998. How repeatable is the estimation of fluctuating asymmetry? Proc R Soc London B 265:1423-1427. (Pubitemid 28395895)
49. Van Dongen S. 2006. Fluctuating asymmetry and developmental instability in evolutionary biology: past, present and future. J Evol Biol 19:1727-1743.
50. Van Dongen S, Cornille R, Lens L. 2009a. Sex and asymmetry in humans: what is the role of developmental instability. J Evol Biol 22: 612-622.
51. Van Dongen S, Wijnaendts LCD, Ten Broek CMA, Galis F. 2009b. Fluctuating asymmetry does not consistently reflect severe developmental disorders in human fetuses. Evolution 63: 1832-1844.
52. Waynforth D. 1999. Differences in time use for mating and nepotistic effort as a function of male attractiveness in rural Belize. Evol Human Behav 20:19-28. (Pubitemid 129311149)
53. Whitlock M. 1996. The heritability of fluctuating asymmetry and the genetic control of developmental stability. Proc R Soc London B 263: 849-854.
54. Whitlock M. 1998. The repeatability of fluctuating asymmetry: a revision and extension. Proc R Soc London B 265:1428-1430.