Evaluating the use of personal response systems in library instruction

Communications in Information Literacy

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 192-201

  Chan, Emily K ^a   Knight, Lorrie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953020573     PISSN: 19335954     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2011.4.2.96     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chickering, A. W. & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, March, 3-7.
2. Collins, B. L., Tedford, R. & Womack, H. D. (2008). "Debating" the merits of clickers in an academic library. North Carolina Libraries, 66(1/2), 20-24. Retrieved from http://www.ncl.ecu.edu/index.php/NCL/article/view/84/114
3. Connor, E. (2009). Perceptions and uses of clicker technology. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 6(1), 19-32. doi:10.1080/15424060802705145
4. Corcos, E. & Monty, V. (2008). Interactivity in library presentations using a personal response system. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(2), 53-60.
5. Deleo, P. A, Eichenholtz, S. & Sosin, A. A. (2009). Bridging the information literacy gap with clickers. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(5), 438-444.
6. Dill, E. (2008). Do clickers improve library instruction? Lock in your answers now. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(6), 527-529.
7. Hoffman, C. & Goodwin, S. (2006). A clicker for your thoughts: Technology for active learning. New Library World, 107 (9/10), 422-433. doi:10.1108/03074800610702606
8. Holliday, W. & Li, Q. (2004). Understanding the Millennials: Updating our knowledge about students. Reference Services Review, 32(4), 356-366.
9. Howe, N. & Strauss, W. (2003). Millennials go to college: Strategies for a New Generation on Campus: Recruiting and admissions, campus life, and the classroom. Washington, DC: American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers.
10. Kay, R. H. (2009). Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems (ICCS). Computers & Education, 52(May), 730-740. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.015
11. Kennedy, G. E. & Cutts, Q. I. (2005). The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 260-268. Retrieved from http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/publications/PAPERS/8183/GK-QC-JCAL-published.pdf
12. Madigan, D., & Sirum, K. L. (2006). Enabling interactive engagement pedagogy through digital technology. ITALICS (Innovations in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences), 5(4), 109-121. Retrieved from http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/italics/vol5iss4/madigan-sirum.pdf
13. Martyn, M. (2007). Clickers in the classroom: An active learning approach. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 30(2), 71-74.
14. Matesic, M. A. & Adams, J. M. (2008). Provocation to learn-A study in the use of personal response systems in information literacy instruction. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 3(1), 1-14. Retrieved from http://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/viewArticle/327/801
15. Nelson, M. L. & Hauck, R. V. (2008). Clicking to learn: A case study of embedding radio-frequency based clickers in an introductory management information systems course. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(1), 55-64.
16. Osterman, A. C. (2007). Student response systems: Keeping the students engaged. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 14(4), 49-57. doi:10.1080/10691310802046801
17. Petersohn, B. (2008). Classroom performance systems, library instruction, and instructional design: A pilot study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 8(3), 313-324. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0007
18. Premkumar, K. & Coupal, C. (2008). Rules of engagement-12 tips for successful use of "clickers" in the classroom. Medical Teacher, 30(2), 146-149. doi:10.1080/01421590801965111
19. Trees, A. R. & Jackson, M. H. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 21-40. doi:10.1080/17439880601141179
20. Wertzberger, J. L. (2008). Who wants to be a millionaire? Using clickers to enhance learning in the library. In E. Connor (Ed.), An introduction to instructional services in academic libraries (pp. 43-51). New York: Routledge.
21. Yourstone, S. A., Kraye, H. S., & Albaum, G. (2008). Classroom questioning with immediate electronic response: Do clickers improve learning? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 75-88. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00166.x