Some determinants of second-order conditioning

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 12-26

  Witnauer, James E ^a   Miller, Ralph R ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditioned inhibition; Context conditioning; Intertrial interval; Second order conditioning

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; FEMALE; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 79952735106     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: 15434508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13420-010-0002-6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Blaisdell, A. P., Bristol, A. S., Gunther, L. M., & Miller, R. R. (1998). Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: Support for the comparator hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 335-351. (Pubitemid 128741627)
2. Blaisdell, A. P., Gunther, L. M., & Miller, R. R. (1999). Recovery from blocking through deflation of the blocking stimulus. Animal Learning & Behavior, 27, 63-76. (Pubitemid 29130011)
3. Chang, R. C., Blaisdell, A. P., & Miller, R. R. (2003). Backward conditioning: Mediation by the context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 171-183. (Pubitemid 37189475)
4. Friedman, B. X., Blaisdell, A. P., Escobar, M., & Miller, R. R. (1998). Comparator mechanisms and conditioned inhibition: Conditioned stimulus-preexposure disrupts Pavlovian inhibition but not explicitly unpaired inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 453-466. (Pubitemid 128737317)
5. Hearst, E., & Franklin, S. R. (1977). Positive and negative relations between a signal and food: Approach withdrawal behavior to the signal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 37-52.
6. Holland, P. C., & Rescorla, R. A. (1975). Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88.
7. Jara, E. T., Vila, J., & Maldonado, A. (2006). Second-order conditioning of human causal learning. Learning and Motivation, 37.
8. Jenkins, H. M., Barnes, R. A., & Barrera, F. J. (1981). Why autoshaping depends on trial spacing. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 255-284). New York: Academic Press.
9. Kaufman, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981). A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18.
10. Lysle, D. T., & Fowler, H. (1985). Inhibition as a "slave" process: Deactivation of conditioned inhibition through extinction of conditioned excitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 71-94.
11. Maisiak, R., & Frey, P. W. (1977). Second-order conditioning: The importance of stimulus overlap on second-order trials. Animal Learning & Behavior, 11, 290-294.
12. Marlin, N. A. (1983). Second-order conditioning using a contextual stimulus as S1. Animal Learning & Behavior, 11, 290-294. (Pubitemid 14243533)
13. Myers, J. L., & Well, A.D. (2003). Research design and statistical analysis, 2nd edn. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
14. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford Press.
15. Pineno, O. (2007). A response rule for positive and negative stimulus interaction in associative learning and performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1115-1124.
16. Rashotte, M. E., Griffin, R. W., & Sisk, C. L. (1977). Second-order conditioning of the pigeon's keypeck. Animal Learning & Behavior, 5, 25-38.
17. Rescorla, R. A. (1966). Predictability and number of pairings in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Pschonomic Science, 4, 383-384.
18. Rescorla, R. A. (1982). Simultaneous second-order conditioning produces S-S learning in conditioned suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 23-32.
19. Rizley, R. C., & Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Associations in second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 81, 1-11.
20. Sissons, H. T., Urcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2009). Overshadowing and CS duration: Counteraction and a reexamination of the role of within-compound associations in cue competition. Learning & Behavior, 37, 254-268.
21. Stout, S. C., & Miller, R. R. (2007). Sometimes competing retrieval (SOCR): A formalization of the extended comparator hypothesis. Psychological Review, 114, 759-783.
22. Stout, S. C., Chang, R. C., & Miller, R. R. (2003). Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 23-38. (Pubitemid 38360905)
23. Stout, S. C., Escobar, M., & Miller, R. R. (2004). Trial number and compound stimuli temporal relationship as joint determinants of second-order conditioning and conditioned inhibition. Learning & Behavior, 32, 230-239. (Pubitemid 38963198)
24. Urcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2006a). Counteraction between overshadowing and degraded contingency treatments: Support for the extended comparator hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 21-32. (Pubitemid 43145705)
25. Urcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2006b). A comparator view of Pavlovian and differential inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 271-283. (Pubitemid 44157637)
26. Urcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2008). Counteraction between two kinds of conditioned inhibition training. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 103-107.
27. Urushihara, K., & Miller, R. R. (2006). Overshadowing and the outcome-alone exposure effect counteract each other. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 253-270. (Pubitemid 44157636)
28. Urushihara, K., & Miller, R. R. (2007). CS-duration and partialreinforcement effects counteract overshadowing in select situations. Learning & Behavior, 35, 268-271.
29. Urushihara, K., Stout, S. C., & Miller, R. R. (2004). The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound. Psychological Science, 15, 268-271. (Pubitemid 38535747)
30. Wheeler, D. S., & Miller, R. R. (2008). Determinants of cue interactions. Behavioral Processes, 78, 191-203.
31. Witnauer, J. E., Urcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2008). Reduced blocking as a result of increasing the number of blocking cues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 651-655.
32. Yin, H., Barnet, R. C., & Miller, R. R. (1994). Second-order conditioning and Pavlovian conditioned inhibition: Operational similarities and differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 419-428.