A response rule for positive and negative stimulus interaction in associative learning and performance

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1115-1124

  Pemeño, Oskar ^a  

^a HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149037898     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193100     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ALLAN, L. G. (1980). A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 147-149.
2. BATSON, J. D., & BATSELL, W. R. (2000). Augmentation, not blocking, in an A+/AX+ flavor-conditioning procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 466-471.
3. BRODGEN, W. J. (1939). Sensory preconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 323-332.
4. CHENG, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367-405.
5. CLARKE, J., WESTBROOK, R. F., & IRWIN, J. (1979). Potentiation instead of overshadowing in the pigeon. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 25, 18-29.
6. DENNISTON, J. C., SAVASTANO, H. I., & MILLER, R. R. (2001). The extended comparator hypothesis: Learning by contiguity, responding by relative strength. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. DICKINSON, A., & BURKE, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60-80.
8. DICKINSON, A., NICHOLAS, D. J., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1983). A reexamination of one-trial blocking in conditioned suppression. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35B, 67-79.
9. DURLACH, P. J., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1980). Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: An analysis in terms of within-compound associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 175-187.
10. DWYER, D. M. (1999). Retrospective revaluation or mediated conditioning? The effect of different reinforcers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 289-306.
11. DWYER, D. M. (2001). Mediated conditioning and retrospective revaluation with LiCl then flavour pairings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 145-165.
12. GEWIRTZ, J. C., & DAVIS, M. (2000). Using Pavlovian higher-order conditioning paradigms to investigate the neural substrates of emotional learning and memory. Learning & Memory, 7, 257-266.
13. HOLLAND, P. C. (1981). Acquisition of representation-mediated conditioned food aversions. Learning & Motivation, 12, 1-18.
14. HOLLAND, P. C., & FORBES, D. T. (1982). Representation-mediated extinction of conditioned flavor aversions. Learning & Motivation, 13, 454-471.
15. KAMIN, L. J. (1968). "Attention-like" processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp. 9-31). Miami: University of Miami Press.
16. KRAEMER, P. J., LARIVIERE, N. A., & SPEAR, N. E. (1988). Expression of a taste aversion conditioned with an odor-taste compound: Overshadowing is relatively weak in weanlings and decreases over a retention interval in adults. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 164-168.
17. LASHLEY, K. S., & WADE, M. (1946). The Pavlovian theory of generalization. Psychological Review, 53, 72-87.
18. LUBOW, R. E., & MOORE, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced preexposure to the conditioned stimulus. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 52, 415-419.
19. LYSLE, D. T., & FOWLER, H. (1985). Inhibition as a "slave" process: Deactivation of conditioned inhibition through extinction of conditioned excitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 71-94.
20. MACKINTOSH, N.J.(1971).An analysis of overshadowing and blocking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 118-125.
21. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
22. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 186-192.
23. MAZUR, J. E., & WAGNER, A. R. (1982). An episodic model of associative learning. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Hernnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Acquisition (Vol. 3, pp. 3-39). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
24. MILLER, R. R., & MATZEL, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51-92). San Diego: Academic Press.
25. PAVLOV, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Clarendon Press.
26. PEARCE, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
27. PEARCE, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
28. PEARCE, J. M., & HALL, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
29. PINEÑO, O., URUSHIHARA, K., & MILLER, R. R. (2005). Spontaneous recovery from forward and backward blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 172-183.
30. RESCORLA, R. A. (1980). Pavlovian second-order conditioning: Studies in associative learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. RESCORLA, R. A., & DURLACH, P. J. (1981). Within-event learning in Pavlovian conditioning. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 81-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
33. REVUSKY, S. (1971). The role of interference in association over a delay. In W. K. Honig & P. H. R. James (Eds.), Animal memory. New York: Academic Press.
34. RICCIO, D. C., ACKIL, J., & BURCH- VERNON, A. (1992). Forgetting of stimulus attributes: Methodological implications for assessing associative phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 433-445.
35. RICCIO, D. C., RABINOWITZ, V. C., & AXELROD, S. (1994). Memory: When less is more. American Psychologist, 49, 917-926.
36. RICCIO, D. C., RICHARDSON, R., & EBNER, D. L. (1984). Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 152-165.
37. RIZLEY, R. C., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1972). Associations in second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 81, 1-11.
38. RUSINIAK, K., HANKINS, W., GARCIA, J., & BRETT, L. (1979). Flavor-illness aversions: Potentiation of odor by taste in rats. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 25, 1-17.
39. STOUT, S. [C.], ARCEDIANO, F., ESCOBAR, M., & MILLER, R. R. (2003). Overshadowing as a function of trial number: Dynamics of first- and second-order comparator effects. Learning & Behavior, 31, 85-97.
40. STOUT, S. [C.], ESCOBAR, M., & MILLER, R. R. (2004). Trial number and compound stimuli temporal relationship as joint determinants of second-order conditioning and conditioned inhibition. Learning & Behavior, 32, 230-239.
41. STOUT, S. C., & MILLER, R. R. (2007). Sometimes competing retrieval (SOCR): A formalization of the comparator hypothesis. Psychological Review, 114, 759-783.
42. VAN HAMME, L. J., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning & Motivation, 25, 127-151.
43. WAGNER, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. YIN, H., BARNET, R. C., & MILLER, R. R. (1994). Second-order conditioning and Pavlovian conditioned inhibition: Operational similarities and differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 419-428.