Counteraction between two kinds of conditioned inhibition training

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 103-107

  Urcelay, Gonzalo P ^a   Miller, Ralph R ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; ELECTRIC SHOCK; FEAR; FEMALE; HABITUATION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; RAT; RECALL; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; ELECTROSHOCK; FEAR; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MOTIVATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REVERSAL LEARNING; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 42249090410     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.1.103     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. DENNISTON, J. C., SAVASTANO, H. I., & MILLER, R. R. (2001), The extended comparator hypothesis: Learning by contiguity, responding by relative strength. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 65-117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. HEARST, E., & FRANKLIN, S. R. (1977). Positive and negative relations between a signal and food: Approach-withdrawal behavior to the signal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 37-52.
3. LYSLE, D. T, & FOWLER, H. (1985). Inhibition as a "slave" process: Deactivation of conditioned inhibition through extinction of conditioned excitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 71-94.
4. RESCORLA, R. A. (1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 77-94.
5. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
6. STOUT, S. C., CHANG, R., & MILLER, R. R. (2003). Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 23-38.
7. STOUT, S. C., & MILLER, R. R. (2007). Sometimes competing retrieval (SOCR): A formalization of the comparator hypothesis. Psychological Review, 114,759-783.
8. URCELAY, G. P., & MILLER, R. R. (2006a). A comparator view of Pavlovian and differential inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 271-283.
9. URCELAY, G. P., & MILLER, R. R. (2006b). Counteraction between overshadowing and degraded contingency treatments: Support for the extended comparator hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 21-32.
10. URUSHIHARA, K., & MILLER, R. R. (2006). Overshadowing and the outcome-alone exposure effect counteract each other. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 253-270.
11. WAGNER, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.