Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: Experimental changes in habitat quality induced negative density-dependent dispersal

Ecography

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 170-176

  Baguette, Michel ^a,b   Clobert, Jean ^b   Schtickzelle, Nicolas ^c  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^b Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Paul Sabatier University   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOG; BUTTERFLY; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; DISPERSAL; HABITAT QUALITY; METAPOPULATION; PATCH DYNAMICS; PERSISTENCE;

BOLORIA EUNOMIA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 79952405633     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06212.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Baguette, M. et al. 1998. Sex-biased density-dependent migration in a metapopulation of the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Acta Oecol. 19: 17-24.
2. Bonte, D. et al. 2003. Patch quality and connectivity influence spatial dynamics in a dune wolfspider. Oecologia 135: 227-233.
3. Bowler, D. E. and Benton, T. G. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. 80: 205-225.
4. Bowler, D. E. and Benton, T. G. 2009a. Variation in dispersal mortality and dispersal propensity among individuals: the effects of age, sex and resource availability. J. Anim. Ecol. 78: 1234-1241.
5. Bowler, D. E. and Benton, T. G. 2009b. Impact of dispersal on population growth: the role of inter-patch distance. Oikos 118: 403-412.
6. Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed.. Springer.
7. Cadet, C. et al. 2003. The evolution of dispersal under demographic stochasticity. Am. Nat. 162: 427-441.
8. Clobert, J. et al. 2008. Evolution of dispersal. - In: Danchin, E. et al (eds), Behavioural ecology. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 323-362.
9. Clobert, J. et al. 2009. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol. Lett. 12: 197-209.
10. Cote, J. and Clobert, J. 2007. Social information and emigration: lessons from immigrants. Ecol. Lett. 10: 411-417.
11. Cressman, R. and Krivan, V. 2006. Migration dynamics for the ideal free distribution. Am. Nat. 168: 384-397.
12. Delgado, M. D. and Penteriani, V. 2008. Behavioral states help translate dispersal movements into spatial distribution patterns of floaters. Am. Nat. 172: 475-485.
13. Doligez, B. et al. 2002. Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population. Science 297: 1168-1170.
14. Fleishman, E. et al. 2002. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv. Biol. 16: 706-716.
15. Fretwell, S. D. and Lucas, H. L. 1970. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36.
16. Gibbs, M. et al. 2010. Organisms on the move: ecology and evolution of dispersal. Biol. Lett. 6: 146-148.
17. Gros, A. et al. 2006. Evolution of local adaptations in dispersal strategies. Oikos 114: 544-552.
18. Gundersen, G. et al. 2001. Source-sink dynamics affect demography of sources. Ecol. Lett. 4: 14-21.
19. Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396: 41-49.
20. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford Univ. Press.
21. Hastings, A. and Botsford, L. W. 2006. Persistence of spatial populations depends on returning home. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 6067-6072.
22. Haugen, T. O. et al. 2006. The ideal free pike: 50 years of fitness-maximizing dispersal in Windermere. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 2917-2924.
23. Heino, M. and Hanski, I. 2001. Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Am. Nat. 157: 495-511.
24. Holt, R. D. and Barfield, M. 2001. On the relationship between the ideal free distribution and the evolution of dispersal. - In: Clobert, J. et al (eds), Dispersal. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 83-95.
25. Hovestadt, T. and Poethke, H. J. 2006. The control of emigration and its consequences for the survival of populations. Ecol. Model. 190: 443-453.
26. Hovestadt, T. and Nieminen, M. 2009. Costs and benefits of dispersal in butterflies. - In: Settele, J. et al (eds), Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 97-106.
27. Lambin, X. 1994. Natal philopatry, competition for resources, and inbreeding avoidance in Townsend's voles (Microtus townsendii). Ecology 75: 224-235.
28. Lecomte, J. et al. 2004. Connectivity and homogenisation of population sizes: an experimental approach in Lacerta vivipara. J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 179-189.
29. Le Galliard, J.-F. et al. 2003. Mother-offspring interactions affect natal dispersal in a lizard. Proc. R. Soc. B 270: 1163-1169.
30. Loe, L. E. et al. 2009. Negative density-dependent emigration of males in an increasing red deer population. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 2581-2587.
31. Mathias, A. et al. 2001. Divergent evolution of dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Evolution 55: 246-259.
32. Matter, S. F. and Roland, J. 2002. An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 308-316.
33. Matter, S. F. et al. 2009. Interactions between habitat quality and connectivity affect immigration but not abundance or population growth of the butterfly, Parnassius smintheus. Oikos 118: 1461-1470.
34. Meylan, S. et al. 2007. Adaptive significance of maternal induction of density-dependent phenotypes. Oikos 116: 650-661.
35. Morris, D. W. and Diffendorfer, J. E. 2004. Reciprocating dispersal by habitat-selecting white-footed mice. Oikos 107: 549-558.
36. Nève, G. et al. 1996. Dispersal, colonization power and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 14-22.
37. Ortego, J. et al. 2008. Individual genetic diversity correlates with the size and spatial isolation of natal colonies in a bird metapopulation. Proc. R. Soc. B 275: 2039-2047.
38. Perrin, N. and Goudet, J. 2001. Inbreeding, kinship and the evolution of natal dispersal. - In: Clobert, J. et al (eds), Dispersal. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 123-142.
39. Poethke, H. J. and Hovestadt, T. 2002. Evolution of density-and patch-size-dependent dispersal rates. Proc. R. Soc. B 269: 637-645.
40. Poethke, H. J. et al. 2003. Local extinction and the evolution of dispersal rates: causes and correlations. Am. Nat. 161: 631-640.
41. Poethke, H. J. et al. 2007. The relative contribution of individual and kin selection to the evolution of density-dependent dispersal rates. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9: 41-50.
42. Poethke, H. J. et al. 2010. Predator-induced dispersal and the evolution of conditional dispersal in correlated environments. Am. Nat. 175: 577-586.
43. Rabasa, S. G. et al. 2007. Metapopulation structure and habitat quality in modelling dispersal in the butterfly Iolana iolas. Oikos 116: 793-806.
44. Ronce, O. 2007. How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 231-253.
45. Schtickzelle, N. and Baguette, M. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 533-545.
46. Schtickzelle, N. et al. 2006. Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. Ecology 87: 1057-1065.
47. Schtickzelle, N. et al. 2007a. Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 4.
48. Schtickzelle, N. et al. 2007b. Grazing management impacts the viability of the threatened bog fritillary butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Biol. Conserv. 136: 651-660.
49. Stamps, J. A. 1987. Conspecifics as cues to territory quality: a preference of juvenile lizard (Anolis aeneus) for previously used territories. Am. Nat. 129: 629-642.
50. Stamps, J. A. 2001. Habitat selection by dispersers: integrating proximate and ultimate approach. - In: Clobert, J. et al (eds), Dispersal. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 230-242.
51. Stevens, V. M. et al. 2010. A meta-analysis of dispersal in butterflies. Biol. Rev. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00119.x.
52. Thomas, J. A. et al. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 1791-1796.
53. Travis, J. M. J. and Dytham, C. 1998. The evolution of dispersal in a metapopulation: a spatially explicit, individual-based model. Proc. R. Soc. B 265: 17-23.
54. Travis, J. M. J. and Dytham, C. 1999. Habitat persistence, habitat availability and the evolution of dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. B 266: 723-728.
55. Travis, J. M. J. et al. 1999. The evolution of density-dependent dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. B 266: 1837-1842.
56. Turchin, P. 1998. Quantifying analysis of movements. Measuring and modeling populations redistribution in animal and plants. Sinauer.
57. Turlure, C. et al. 2009. Resource-based habitat definition, niche overlap and conservation of two sympatric glacial relict butterflies. Oikos 118: 950-960.
58. Vandewoestijne, S. and Baguette, M. 2004. Genetic population structure of the vulnerable bog fritillary butterfly. Hereditas 141: 199-206.
59. Vandewoestijne, S. et al. 2008. Positive correlation between genetic diversity and fitness in a large, well-connected metapopulation. BMC Biol. 6: 46.