Resource-based habitat definition, niche overlap and conservation of two sympatric glacial relict butterflies

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 950-960

  Turlure, Camille ^a   Van Dyck, Hans ^a   Schtickzelle, Nicolas ^a   Baguette, Michel ^b  

^a EARTH AND LIFE INSTITUTE   (Belgium)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTOPE; BUTTERFLY; COEXISTENCE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; HABITAT USE; HOST PLANT; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; NICHE OVERLAP; RELICT COMMUNITY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SYMPATRY; TOLERANCE;

PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 66749084354     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17269.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abrams, P. 1980. Some comments on measuring niche overlap Ecology 61 : 44 49.
2. Baguette, M. 2004. The classical metapopulation theory and the real, natural world: a critical appraisal Basic Appl. Ecol. 5 : 213 224. (Pubitemid 38927648)
3. Baguette, M. Nève, G. 1994. Adult movements between populations in the specialist butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) Ecol Entomol 19 : 1 5. (Pubitemid 2042195)
4. Baguette, M. Mennechez, G. 2004. Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: a consensual viewpoint Oikos 106 : 399 403. (Pubitemid 39059113)
5. Barascud, B. Descimon, H. 1992. Deux papillons "reliques glaciaires" en France: Lycaena helle (Lycaenidae) et Proclossiana eunomia (Nymphalidae). Biogéographie, génétique et conservation Insectes 87 : 5 9.
6. Benzecri, J. P. 1992. Correspondance analysis handbook. Marcel Dekker.
7. Bryant, S. R. et al. 2002. The influence of thermal ecology on the distribution of three nymphalid butterflies J. Appl. Ecol. 39 : 43 55. (Pubitemid 34215620)
8. Burnham, K. P. Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer.
9. Cabeza, M. Moilanen, A. 2001. Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 242 248. (Pubitemid 32285449)
10. Dennis, R. L. H. 2004a. Butterfly habitats, broad-scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisited Ecol. Entomol. 29 : 744 752. (Pubitemid 39623299)
11. Dennis, R. L. H. 2004b. Just how important are structural elements as habitat components? Indications from a declining lycaenid butterfly with priority conservation status J. Insect Conserv. 8 : 37 45. (Pubitemid 38768046)
12. Dennis, R. L. H. Eales, H. T. 1999. Probability of site occupancy in the large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia determined from geographical and ecological data Biol. Conserv. 87 : 295 301. (Pubitemid 28564637)
13. Dennis, R. L. H. et al. 2003. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint Oikos 102 : 417 426. (Pubitemid 36922187)
14. Dennis, R. L. H. et al. 2006. Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies Biodiv. Conserv. 15 : 1943 1966. (Pubitemid 44026203)
15. Dingle, H. 1996. Migration. The biology of life on the move. Oxford Univ. Press.
16. Dover, J. W. et al. 1997. The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes J. Insect Conserv. 1 : 89 97. (Pubitemid 127715669)
17. Edwards, J. W. et al. 1998. Niche overlap in sympatric populations of fox and gray squirrels J. Wildlife Manage. 62 : 354 363. (Pubitemid 28146789)
18. Ellenberg, H. 1974. Zeigerwerte der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scripta Geobot. IX.
19. Fahrig, L. 2001. How much habitat is enough Biol. Conserv. 100 : 65 74. (Pubitemid 32602333)
20. Fleishman, E. et al. 2001. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics Conserv. Biol. 16 : 706 716.
21. Friberg, M. et al. 2008. Habitat choice precedes host plant choice - niche separation in a species pair of a generalist and a specialist butterfly Oikos 117 : 1337 1344.
22. Graham, M. H. 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression Ecology 84 : 2809 2815. (Pubitemid 38261430)
23. Hall, L. S. et al. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology Wildlife Soc. Bull. 25 : 173 182. (Pubitemid 27236316)
24. Hanski, I. et al. 1994. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia Ecology 75 : 747 762.
25. Holland, J. D. et al. 2004. Determining the spatial scale of species′ response to habitat Bioscience 54 : 227 233. (Pubitemid 38319306)
26. Jongman, R. et al. 2004. European ecological networks and greenways Landscape Urban Planning 68 : 305 319. (Pubitemid 38334753)
27. Jongman, R. Pungetti, G. 2004. Ecological networks and greenways. Concepts, design, implementation. Cambridge Univ. Press.
28. Joy, J. Pullin, A. S. 1997. The effects of flooding on the survival and behaviour of overwintering large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia larvae Biol. Conserv. 82 : 61 66. (Pubitemid 27322278)
29. Linton, L. R. et al. 1981. Resource utilization indices: an assessment J. Anim. Ecol. 50 : 283 292.
30. Loertscher, M. et al. 1995. Microdistribution of butterflies in a mosaic-like habitat: the role of nectar sources Ecography 18 : 15 26.
31. McIntire, E. J. B. et al. 2007. Designing a network for butterfly habitat restoration: where individuals, populations and landscapes interact J. Appl. Ecol. 44 : 725 736. (Pubitemid 47024871)
32. McLean, I. F. G. et al. 1999. The role of legislation in conserving Europe's threatened species Conserv. Biol. 13 : 966 969. (Pubitemid 29475525)
33. Mikami, K. M. Kawata, M. 2004. Does interspecific territoriality reflect the intensity of ecological interactions? A theoritical model for interspecific territoriality Evol. Ecol. Res. 6 : 765 775. (Pubitemid 38893791)
34. Mikami, K. M. et al. 2004. A new hypothesis for species coexistence: male-male repulsion promotes coexistence in competing species Popul. Ecol. 46 : 213 217.
35. Mitchell, S. C. 2005. How useful is the concept of habitat? - a critique Oikos 110 : 634 638. (Pubitemid 41296781)
36. Neve, G. et al. 1996. Dispersal, colonization power and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) J. Appl. Ecol. 33 : 14 22.
37. Odum, E. P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology, 3rd ed. W.B. Saunders Co.
38. Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37 : 637 669. (Pubitemid 44907632)
39. Parmesan, C. et al. 1999. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming Nature 399 : 579.
40. Pe'er, G. Settele, J. 2008. Butterflies in and for conservation: trends and prospects Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54 : 7 17.
41. Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes Am. Nat. 158 : 87 99. (Pubitemid 32550582)
42. Schoener, T. W. 1970. Nonsynchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats Ecology 51 : 408 418.
43. Schtickzelle, N. et al. 2002. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: demographic processes in a patchy population Oikos 97 : 349 360. (Pubitemid 34793696)
44. Smallidge, P. J. et al. 1996. Community characteristics and vegetation management of Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) habitats on rights-of-way in east-central New York, USA J. Appl. Ecol. 33 : 1405 1419.
45. Sutherland, W. J. 1998. The importance of behavioural studies in conservation biology Anim. Behav. 56 : 801 809. (Pubitemid 28494525)
46. Thomas, J. A. et al. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 : 1791 1796. (Pubitemid 32844026)
47. Tilman, D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton Univ. Press.
48. Vanreusel, W. Van Dyck, H. 2007. When functional habitat does not match vegetation types: a resource-based approach to map butterfly habitat Biol. Conserv. 135 : 202 211. (Pubitemid 44917927)
49. White, G. C. Burnham, K. P. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals Bird Study 46 Suppl. : S120 S139.
50. White, P. Kerr, J. T. 2006. Contrasting spatial and temporal global change impacts on butterfly species richness during the 20th century Ecography 29 : 908 918. (Pubitemid 46145592)