Information system use-related activity: An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use

Information Systems Research

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 173-192

  Barki, Henri ^a   Titah, Ryad ^a   Boffo, Céline ^b  

^a HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Telecommunication business unit   (Canada)

Author keywords

Formative constructs; IS implementation; IS use; User adaptation; User learning

Indexed keywords

HARDWARE;

FORMATIVE CONSTRUCTS; INDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS; INTERACTION BEHAVIOR; IS IMPLEMENTATION; MULTIPLE INDICATORS; TASK TECHNOLOGY FIT; USER ADAPTATION; USER LEARNING;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 44549083692     PISSN: 10477047     EISSN: 15265536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/isre.1070.0122     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Agarwal, R. 2000. Individual acceptance of information technologies. R. W. Zmud, ed. Framing the Domains of IT Management. Pinnaflex, Cincinnati, OH, 105-127.
2. Agarwal, R., E. Karahanna. 2000. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 24(4) 665-694.
3. Beaudry, A., A. Pinsonneault. 2005. Understanding user responses to IT: A user adaptation coping acts model. MIS Quart. 29(3) 493-524.
4. Bentler, P. M., C. P. Chou. 1987. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol. Methods Res. 16(1) 78-117.
5. Bollen, K., R. Lennox. 1991. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psych. Bull. 110(2) 305-314.
6. Brancheau, J. C., J. C. Wethcrbe. 1990. The adoption of spreadsheet software: Testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing. Inform. Systems Res. 1(2) 115-144.
7. Burton-Jones, A., D. W. Straub. 2006. Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3) 228-246.
8. Byrne, B. M. 1998. Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
9. Chin, W. W., B. L. Marcolin, P. R. Newsted. 2003. Supplemental material. Inform. System Res. 14(2) 18. http://www2.informs.org/Pubs/ Supplements/ISR/1526-5536-2003-02-SupplA.pdf.
10. Compeau, D. R., C. A. Higgins. 1995. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MLS Quart. 19(2) 189-211.
11. Conger, J. A., R. N. Kanungo, S. T. Menon. 2000. Charismatic leadership and follower effects. J. Organ. Behav. 21 747-767.
12. DeLone, W. H., E. McLean. 1992. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. 3(1) 60-95.
13. DeLone, W. H., E. McLean. 2003. The Delone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(4) 9-30.
14. Devaraj, S., R. Kohli. 2003. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. 49(3) 273-289.
15. Diamantopoulos, A., J. A. Siguaw. 2006. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British J. Management 17 263-282.
16. Diamantopoulos, A., H. Winklhofer. 2001. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. 38(2) 269-277.
17. Doll, W. J., G. Torkzadeh. 1998. Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Inform. Management 33 171-185.
18. Edwards, J. R. 2001. Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organ. Res. Methods 4(2) 144-192.
19. Elangovan, A. R., J. L. Xie. 1999. Effects of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating role of subordinate characteristics. J. Organ. Behav. 20 359-373.
20. Gasser, L. 1986. The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Trans. Office Inform. Systems 4(3) 205-225.
21. Gatian, A. W. 1994. Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness? Inform. Management 26(3) 119-131.
22. Gefen, D., E. Karahanna, D. W. Straub. 2003. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. 27(1) 51-90.
23. Goodhue, D. L. 1995. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Sci. 41(12) 1827-1844.
24. Goodhue, D. L., R. L. Thompson. 1995. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. 19(2) 213-236.
25. Hartwick, J., H. Barki. 1994. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. 40(4) 440-465.
26. Im, K. S., V. Grover. 2004. The use of structural equation modeling in IS research: Review and recommendations. M. E. Whitman, A. B. Woszczynski, eds. The Handbook of Information Systems Research, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 44-65.
27. Tarvis, C. B., S. B. Mackenzie, P. M. Podsakoff. 2003. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. 30(2) 199-218.
28. Jasperson, J., P. E. Carter, R. W. Zmud. 2005. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology-enabled work systems. MIS Quart. 29(3) 525-557.
29. Jiang, J. J., G. Klein, C. L. Carr. 2002. Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS Quart. 26(2) 145-161.
30. Johnson, B. M., R. E. Rice. 1987. Managing Organizational Innovation: The Evolution From Word Processing to Office Information Systems. Columbia University Press, New York.
31. Jöreskog, K. G., A. S. Sörbom. 2005. Interactive LISREL. Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL.
32. Kaptelinin, V., B., A. Nardi. 1997. Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. CHI 97 Electronic Publications. www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/ proceedings/tutotial/bn.htm.
33. Kerlinger, F. N., H. B. Lee. 2000. Foundations of Behavioral Research, 4th ed. Wadsworth, Thomson Learning, Stamford, CT
34. Kuutti, K., ed. 1995. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. B. A. Nardi, ed. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 17-44.
35. Lamb, R., R. Kling. 2003. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quart. 27(2) 197-235.
36. Lassila, K. S., J. C. Brancheau. 1999. Adoption and utilization of commercial software packages: Exploring utilization equilibria, transitions, triggers, and tracks. J. Management Inform. Systems 16(2) 63-90.
37. Law, K. S., C. S. Wong, W. H. Mobley. 1998. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad. Management Rev 23(4) 741-755.
38. Lewis, L. K., D. R. Seibold. 1993. Innovation modification during intraorganizational adoption. Acad. Management Rev. 18(2) 322-354.
39. Lucas, H. C., Jr., V. K. Spitler. 1999. Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sci. 30(2) 291-311.
40. March, J. G. 1996. Continuity and change in theories of organizational action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2) 278-287.
41. Marcolin, B. L., D. R. Compeau, M. C. Munro, S. L. Huff. 2000. Assessing user competence: Conceptualization and measurement. Inform. Systems Res. 11(1) 37-60.
42. Moore, G. C., I. Benbasat. 1996. Integrating diffusion of innovations and theory of reasoned action models to predict utilization of information technology by end users. K. Kautz, J. Pries-Heje, eds. Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology. Chapman and Hall Publishers, London, UK, 132-146.
43. Nambisan, S., R. Agarwal, M. Tanniru. 1999. Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quart. 23(3) 365-395.
44. Nardi, B. A. 1995a. Activity theory and human-computer interaction. B. A. Nardi, ed. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 7-16.
45. Nardi, B. A., ed. 1995b. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
46. Orlikowski, W. J. 1992. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3) 398-427.
47. Orlikowski, W. J. 1996. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1) 63-92.
48. Orlikowski, W. J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4) 404-429.
49. Papa, W. H., M. J. Papa. 1992. Communication network patterns and the re-invention of new technology. J. Bus. Comm. 29(1) 41-61.
50. Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5) 879-903.
51. Poole, M. S., G. DeSanctis. 1990. Understanding the use of group decision systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. J. Fulk, C. Steinfeld, eds. Organizations and Communication Technology. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 173-193.
52. Rice, R. E., E. M. Rogers. 1980. Reinvention in the innovation process. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1(4) 499-514.
53. Saga, V. L., R. W. Zmud. 1994. The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. L. Levine, ed. Diffusion, Transfer, and Implementation of Information Technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 67-86.
54. Seddon, P. B. 1997. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. 8(3) 240-253.
55. Staples, S. D, I. Wong, P. B. Seddon. 2002. Having expectations of information systems benefits that match received benefits: Does it really matter? Inform. Management 40 115-131.
56. Straub, D. W., M. Limayem, E. Karahanna-Evaristo. 1995. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. 41(8) 1328-1342.
57. Szajna, B. 1993. Determining information system usage: Some issues and examples. Inform. Management 25 147-154.
58. Tyre, M. J., W. J. Orlikowski. 1994. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. 5(1) 98-118.
59. Vandenbosch, B., C. H. Higgins. 1996. Information acquisition and mental models: An investigation into the relationship between behavior and learning. Inform. Systems Res. 7(2) 198-214.
60. Winklhofer, H. M., A. Diamantopoulos. 2002. Managerial evaluation of sales forecasting effectiveness: A MIMIC modeling approach. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 19 151-166.
61. Wixom, B. H., P. A. Todd. 2005. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform. Systems Res. 16(1) 85-102.